Spoken by someone who takes pride in being AlwaysWrong.
You do, DimBulb. Same intelligence.
Parallel port replacement??
Mar 01, 2009
66 Replies
So! It's proven... RoyLFuchs _is_ AlwaysWrong... IP match.
...Jim Thompson
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC\'s and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona 85048 Skype: Contacts Only | |
| Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat |
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |
I love to cook with wine Sometimes I even put it in the food
It was never denied, dumbfuck.
you really ought to though, because it runs off of a bloody '186, and is the basis for the utter destruction of your fallacious argument. Ta ta.
Clueless idiot; DimBulb class.
They have the problem you appear to describe: CPU hardware interrupts clashing with the interrupt numbers foolishly chosen by IBM for BIOS services.
there may be some other problem, with the 80186 but you have not mentioned it.
no it's not, just don't use those hardware features, it's not like the features are ones that 8088 targeted DOS applications will use anyway.
as far as I can tell the only hardware interrups that were added on the 186 were 'BOUND' and 'INVALID OPCODE' and they are entirely optional (in that software that was written to intel's 8088/8086 specifications will not trigger them).
what's more, these same interrups are present on the later processors.
Join the Discussion
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Didn't find your answer?
Ask the community — no account required