NiMH charger(s)

Is there any major difference between NiMH chargers besides amount of batteries and chargetime they can handle ..? Any particular good/bad brands of batteries ..?

I'm wonder if low-end types miss temperature measurement and have a rough charge cycle (timer based?).. etc..

Reply to
pbdelete
Loading thread data ...

Yes. Essentially, the cheaper, the less features. On the cheapest, expect to be able to only charge banks of cells - say 2 or 4, and for them to be on a simple timer set for the batteries included 'free'. They will not often cause other cells to explode.

Slightly more expensive, and you get delta-vee based shutoff, more expensive still and you'll get delta-vee and thermal. And for extra money, you can get the last two with actual charge state displays, rather than just LEDs. For even more money, you can get ones that can measure and report capacity too.

Reply to
Ian Stirling

batteries

Monitoring the temperature of a NimH cell is a good idea during charge and high current discharge to avoid damage to the cells.

--
Reply to nico@nctdevpuntnl (punt=.)
Bedrijven en winkels vindt U op www.adresboekje.nl
Reply to
Nico Coesel

batteries

Oh, I'm not saying it's not. Just what current chargers do. Per-pack, or ideally per cell temp measurement is the gold standard.

Reply to
Ian Stirling

Any tip on what to look for physicaly to find the good ones? Guess delta-V and Temperature monitoring is what to look for. Other than that there's no major discrepancy ?

Reply to
pbdelete

Build quality, connectors that work reliably, ... Generally, any mention of charge termination other than timer means it's delta0-v. And temperature monitoring tends to be mentioned seperately.

Reply to
Ian Stirling

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.