Favourite op amp for driving ADCs?

for you?

isn't the ad8615 almost the same but with twice the drive and half the sett ling time?

-Lasse

Thanks. I'd be sort of worried about its accuracy though--A_VOL is only

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

Why would you be worried about exceeding the "absolute max" if you are designing within the spec? The absolute max is not something that blows the chip away if exceeded... well, maybe it is, lol. But really, what is your concern, that the PSU will exceed the rated Vdd max or that being close to it can have consequences? I think the typical rating of a chip is +-10% on Vdd meaning it is ok for the PSU to be anywhere in that range. Is the Vdd for the specified parameters over a range smaller than +-10%? I just can't imagine the chip having a problem with a 5.6 V transient.

When you're trying to start an instruments company, it's not very smart to be courting field failures by pushing abs max ratings like that. If I have to, I'll put in an extra diode.

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

-Lasse

"Pushing"? Don't you think the manufacturer has provided adequate tolerance in the part so that you can use the full range specified in the data sheet? Or are you worried that your tolerances will put the Vdd outside of the spec?

I tend to design conservatively, but I am happy trusting the manufacturers to spec their parts accurately.

Absolute maximum ratings don't have an implied tolerance. They're, well, _absolutes_. And if they did, wouldn't you want to design for all the parts, including those whose maximum ratings were in the -10% end of the specs?

If you look at the failure statistics, you'd see a failure rate that starts rising _below_ the abs. max, and rising very rapidly in the vicinity of the abs. max. The exact shape and intercept of the curve have become more abrupt - less forgiving - as semi vendors push their processes to go ever faster using many more devices of ever thinner layers that once broken do not heal.

If all your 5V regulators are within 4% over time and temperature, and you're perfectly sure there won't be any overshoots due to line transients or stuff like that, you could argue that way.

Doesn't appeal to me.

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

I think you are over stating the case. Data sheets need to be read with an eye to what they are trying to tell you. I can guarantee that this device will not fail at Vdd = 5.6 volts. There would have to be more margin built into the design for you to operate it at 5.5 volts which

All of the device characteristics are specified...

"ELECTRICAL CHARACTERISTICS: VS = +2.2V to +5.5V "

First page of the data sheet "2.2V TO 5.5V OPERATION"

Someone was being very conservative when they specified this part for

If they are producing units that will fail at Vdd = 5.6 volts I can assure you that many will fail in normal operation.

Yes, but you can be overly conservative too. I've never seen a regulator I would consider using that wasn't within 4%. Otherwise it wouldn't make it into my designs. As to line transients, they will always be a hazard. You need to design for that or the circuit can fail even if you use the part at exactly 5 volts. If you are going to operate at 5.3 volts then you need to take that into account with the accuracy of the PDS.

As I said in another post you are treating 5.5 volts as if it were the actual failure limit which it is not. The manufacturer is adding margin to the failure limit so that you don't need to. The actual failure point is likely above 6 volts or more. It would be instructive to test one and find out.

The manufacturer adds margin to allow for variations in their *own* processes. That means they think you'll eventually get one that is right on the specified limit. Professionals would not rely on that not happening to them.

This is getting tiresome. They won't be pushing the actual spec at all. So running the part at 5.3 volts *which is in spec* should be safe.

"In spec" - does that help with things like low failure rates and long lifetimes? I seems to remember a military reliability estimate that made great use of how close to abs max a part was used in calculating reliability.

I rather like the homespun "my car engine can go to 6000rpm and be "in spec" but that doesn't mean it a good idea to drive everywhere in 2nd gear"

Do you really think the 5.5 volt abs max is the real abs max? No, it is not even close. That is the point. Running my engine next to redline all the time would have eventually destroyed the thing long before the

The mistake everyone is making is thinking that the 5.5 volt figure is the value to use in such a comparison. The destructive breakdown is nowhere near the 5.5 volt spec in the data sheet even for that 1 in

Running a 5.5 volt abs max part at 5.3 volts had better be acceptable and not impact the life of the part. Otherwise there are a lot of designs without adequate control of the Vdd which are going to fail and

You'd have to test all of them, because things like gate breakdown have a production spread. And while you talk about conservative design, you seem to think that the hairy edge of failure is a desirable neighbourhood, whereas I don't.

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

Is this a real spec sheet (if so, which one?), or something that you imagined? Sample of 1 - I grabbed a spec sheet from my pile (OPA379). On the first page it says "Wide supply voltage range: +1.8 to +5.5V"; and on the absolute max ratings it gives 7V.

I probably am being conservative. But then, I like things that I design to be reliable (my customers like that too). Some devices may well tolerate voltages and currents at or slightly above abs max ratings. But fewer (I believe) as financial and competitive pressures force manufacturers into specsmanship games. I don't believe that current absolute limit numbers are conservative - at least when it comes to low-voltage semiconductor products. Worse, I'm not sure how we can resolve this question based on real data rather than conjecture.

Now you are being silly. We simply disagree on what constitutes the "hairy edge of failure". It is only rational that you can't have it both ways. If 5.3 volts is too close to abs max for a long device lifetime then 5 volts is not a lot better. That's my point. I don't believe that because someone put 5.5 volts on a data sheet that it means

This was from the spec sheet of the part we are discussing, the OPA365 which the OP says running at 5.3 volts is too close to it's abs max of

You are distorting what I am saying. I have *never* said a design should exceed the abs max. We are talking about using a part at 5.3 volts when the abs max is 5.5 volts. I'm saying that this is within the spec and should *not* shorten the lifetime of the part.

Shouldn't, but does. "In spec" doesn't guarantee an infinite life. Everyone with experience learns to design conservatively - you're the one being silly.