Transmission Line Pulse Transformers- Theory and Applications
PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE, VOL. 56, NO. 1, JANUARY 1968
Yes. AN762 on Linear Amplifiers was mentioned elsewhere in this thread.
That seems awfully strict for non-native speakers of English. Such a rule would pretty much cripple SED. And the ? mark could well be a typo.
Joe
Didn't find your answer? Ask the community — no account required.
P
Phil Hobbs
It’s a tree, like a baobab with pompoms
J
Jeroen Belleman
Ah, thank you, got it. I've used the balun with the additional single wire like in his Fig.14. That hugely improves the balance at the low frequency end, without affecting the HF.
A bit surprising he doesn't have a reference to Guanella. Oh well.
G. Guanella, “Nouveau transformateur d’adaptation pour haute fréquence”, Revue Brown Boveri, September 1944, pp327-329
You may be interested in transformers that extend Guanella's idea, providing impedance ratios other than the squares of integers:
D.A. McClure, “Broadband transmission line transformer family matches a wide range of impedances”, RF Design, February 1994, pp62-66 & May
1995, pp40-49
I admit I never used those in anger though. The parasitic effects of capacitance to cable screens carrying RF voltages and of the residual inductance of the junctions always made me decide to look for other ways.
As I typed it, it was greek lambda over 4. That's usually the mark of transformers with octave bandwidths. My interest was in transformers with multi-decade bandwidths. I used those in bunch-by-bunch trajectory measurement systems in particle accelerators.
Jeroen Belleman
G
Glen Walpert
Thanks, that clarifies things. A bit tough to see in the assembly photo, but the center tap on the single turn primary is the shorting bar between the two metal tubes on the same end as the coax inner conductor connections. I suppose the two 1/2 turn primary windings contribute independently to the 4 turn output to provide the stated 1:16 ratio.
J
john larkin
Oh, I thought it was an expensive asian drink with floating jelly bubbles of some sort.
Thanks.
D
Don
My earlier spiel contains a typo. Its last link should be
formatting link
One of KF8OD's captions says "the coax is used to accomplish a close coupling" - presumably to enhance efficiency and performance. It's apparently OK for the coax shield to bypass the center tap and act as an ancillary primary.
Danke,
Join the Discussion
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Didn't find your answer?
Ask the community — no account required
Report Content
You are reporting this content to the moderators. They will look at it
ASAP.