1. Home
  2. Electronics Down Under
  3. Re: If this forum was human..

Re: If this forum was human..

F Murtz wrote: [...]

So you say,you two are the ones casting aspersions so you are the ones > to prove it, I do not need to waste time searching for the rare or non > existing hearsay examples

In a normal case, you would be correct to ask that someone proves the claim they make. But this case isn't a normal case. It's a case where someone says "The sky is blue!" and you say "No, it's not!", because you have your eyes closed.

If you want proof, please feel free to search aus.* on my exchanges with Roddles, that should give you some ideas.

Or you can make it really simple and just search for his postings with "You could never bullshit" or/and "out of a wet paper bag". That should give you a few thousand hits! :-(

The main problem cases are if someone corrects/disputes some of Roddles' statements/claims/. When then happens, most of the time Roddles goes ballistic and into foot-stamping and insulting mode. If you haven't seen that, you haven't been here (aus.*) or had your eyes closed. Period.

OTOH, to be fair, Roddles has his spurious good moments, with good discussion/contribution. One such episode was just recently in another group (which I won't mention to protect its audience, and no, I wasn't involved, just watching). So there you go.

Reply to
Frank Slootweg
Loading thread data ...

Yes I have seen all that,but it does not make him wrong just because someone disputes his statements.

Reply to
F Murtz

And have you noticed that in the main the good discussions are with sensible people?

Reply to
F Murtz

:)) Actually Rod and the F.Murf is closely related. I think F.Murf was pooped out by Rod. ;-)

Reply to
Damian

It does make you wrong. 'cos you are poop came out of him. So, you do need to find your own answers in the cyberspace.

Reply to
Damian

And you are not one of them. You're just Rod's poop still attached to his bum via a string. :-)

Reply to
Damian

Are you on some sort of drug, as your posts are a bit incompressible?

Reply to
F Murtz

Yep, he's always been a druggy.

Reply to
Rod Speed

Non-response duly noted.

Non-response duly noted.

Sigh! In the cases where he resorts to foot-stamping and insulting, he

*is* wrong, *knows* it and does *not* have *any* counter-argument.

In case you don't get it, with 'foot-stamping', I mean the foot-stamping of a three-year old. I.e. *all* he does, is say "You're wrong/stupid/!" without saying *why* the other party is wrong, and he does that because he *doesn't* have a counter-argument.

So I repeat: If you haven't seen that - unsubstantiated foot-stamping and insulting -, you haven't been here (aus.*) or had your eyes closed.

From your response, we can safely conclude the latter.

Reply to
Frank Slootweg

There are very, very few good discussions in the first place. But no, Roddles has no excuse whatsoever that the quality of the discussion mostly or even solely depends on the 'sensibility' of his correspondents. Quite the contrary, he has many, many of these fights with quite sensible people.

Bottom line: Roddles and Roddles alone is responsible for *his* actions.

My advice: Let this rest. You have no case, no case at all. If you want to help Roddles, then support him - if you think he's right - with actual factual arguments in an actual factual discussion.

Reply to
Frank Slootweg

You are just plain wrong, as always.

That happens when terminal fuckwits such as yourself desperately attempt to bullshit your way out of your predicament, as always.

Reply to
Rod Speed

Very difficult with no one able to come up with factual instances.

Reply to
F Murtz

QED.

QED.

Pathetic, dishonest, 'convenient', silent snip duly noted.

QED.

Reply to
Frank Slootweg

You were given several - actually thousands - of examples. You chose to keep sticking your head in the sand. Your choice, not our problem.

But to add insult (literally) to injury, Roddles was kind enough to give a demonstration in this very thread.

QED.

HTH, HAND, EOD, NC.

Reply to
Frank Slootweg

What a stunning line in rational argument you have there, troll.

Reply to
Rod Speed

This wouldn?t be you doing precisely what you howl about, eh hypocrite ?

Reply to
Rod Speed

I think you're on backyard booze, 'cos you're talking about compressing my posts. Read this,

formatting link

Start buying your booze, the walk to the supermarket and walk back home is good for you, and prevents you from overdoing it. You will also be helping the governement and those hardworking, poor booze companies.

Reply to
Damian

formatting link

You'll be next, man! Quit those illegal backyard activities immediately!

Reply to
Damian

Very well said.

Reply to
Damian

The Boozemeister hasth approached the arena to defend thyself.

Hey, I didn't do it!

Reply to
Damian

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.