Hello Rick,
HD>> The low price of the Pi Zero flows away, because of the costs of all the HD>> conversion cables to connect it to the outside world, HD>> i.e. micro HDMI to HDMI, micro USB2 to/from normal USB2A, HD>> USB2-RJ45 dongle etc. HD>> And then you still have less memory and less speed compaired to a Pi 3B.
RC> That's true of the rPi anyway as the cost of the keyboard, mouse, RC> monitor and even a decent power supply ends up being significantly pricey RC> compared to the rPi itself.
Yes, that's true, but that is not what I wanted to tell. I was comparing the costs of the Pi Zero and conversion cables to the regular Pi 1B, so to connect the same I/O cables (i.e. HDMI, USB2 and RJ45 EtherNet) as I would use on a normal Pi. So I can change a Pi 1B for a Zero in one go. Then I need at least these three conversion cables.
RC> The zero doesn't need a microHDMI to HDMI converter, just have a RC> suitable cable.
I already have two normal HDMI to HDMI, and two HDMI to DVI-D cables. So for a Pi Zero I only need a Micro HDMI-male to normal HDMI-Female, you see? With that short converters I can use the normal cables. Or should I also buy a micro-HDMi to normal HDMI-male for the Pi Zero? and a Micro-HDMI to DVI-D one, that's also double ;-( So one simple short micro HDMI tot HDMI female will do right. Then I can choose to use the HDMI to HDMI cable, or the HDMI to DVI-D version incombination with that converter cable.
Of course I also have a normal HDMI to VGA converter for use at VGA monitors at computerclubs etc. Then I do not need to carry a monitor with me.
RC> Everything I have is micro USB using a standard cable unless it's a RC> keyboard or mouse. You can use the zero headless just as well as anything.
I know, but I never use computers headless. Second, I do not have a smarth phone, so no micro usb needed ;-). The only micro USB I need are for the Pi's, and my Garmin 2595LMT autoroutenavigator.
RC> I guess costing a PC kinda blows the budget if you want to count that.
Yes, but in reality you have to spend that to get a working combination.
Here people need inland ECDIS on their ships, and I made a solution with a Pi
3B and sell a complete configured microSDcard to them. Then they want to know what to buy else to get a complete system. So I made a complete description of the materials needed to get a full stand alone working ECDIS Pi system. If you count everything, a laptop costs more.
RC> What is the RJ-45 for? You mean an Ethernet USB converter?
Yes, is a simply Emiment EM1010 USB2 to RJ45 10/100bT EtherNet converter.
RC> You can always develop you app on a regular rPi then use the zero in the RC> end device.
Yes, I know. I have 5 Pi's; 2 x 1B, 1B+, 2B and 3B, but no Zero. The Pi's 1B and 1B+ are running RISC OS, and the 2B and 3B are running Raspbian and Ubuntu Linux. On the raspbian version with help I have compiled and installed OpenCPN 4.6.1 with OpenSeaMap and S57 charts for Inland ECDIS as asked by European law. For the data transfer a FTDI USB2A to RS232c cable is needed between the Class A inland AIS-transponder and the Pi or laptop computer. We also find out a cheap 12 or 24 Vdc= to 5 Vdc= converter for powering the Pi
3B. It is silly to first convert the ship's dc to normal power 230 Vac~ 50 Hz, and then convert that back to +5 Vdc=/2.5 Adc= for the Pi 3B.
Now I am thinking to set up a Pi as a FidoNet mailer as a plan C. The amount of kilo Watts will dramatically drop, compared to this current FidoNet node on a 80486 pc with DOS 5 and an analoge V34 POTS modem. First I have to create (buy or build) an USB HDD, because when used intensively, a micro SDcard will soon die. Second I need to know which Linux software I can use? For RISC OS, I could use !ROSBink and have to find out what other software package as a tosser, scanner and mail-editor. I have a good FidoNet Point package !WimpLink that can be combined with !ROSBink, but I can not use that as a FidoNet Node. The other disadvantage is, that I then have to move mailpackets between software programs and also have to do some manual setup of FLO-files etc. for transferring every day. So I think the more recent Linux software will be a better choice for automatically importing and exporting FidoNet messages with less work? There is much to find out and learn, but my physical energy is very limited. So it is a slow proces, and other things in real life have higher priorities.
Henri.