weather instrument barograph ink resource and pen modification?

Picked up a 1972 Taylor barograph. This is a weather instrument with an electronic rotating drum. On the drum is taped a chart and, in combination with a "pen" (of sorts), barometric pressure is recorded. After a week, the charts are removed and replaced with a fresh one.

I picked this up surplus with the hopes of reselling, but I am having trouble with two things: 1) sourcing a *cheap* slow drying ink, and 2) possible pen woes.

I'm posting here because the rotating drum is, after all, electronic. In other words, it does not use a wind up key, but electronic mechanism and initial tests show that at least it appears to be rotating correctly and on time.

However, just for testing, I cannot seem to find a low cost slow drying ink. There is "barograph ink", but it is quite expensive for a tiny amount. I know there must be alternative slow drying inks out there with different names at less cost that might be suitable. Any suggestions would be welcome here.

Another thing I want to work on is the pen. The original is a tiny, triangular shaped stainless steel reservoir. A drop of ink is placed in the reservoir and this lasts until empty. There are alternative "pens" that are felt tipped, require no ink, and last up to two years... but again expensive. I'm wondering if I might be able to modify or use a standard felt pen from the store somehow in this application. Further suggestions appreciated.

Thank you, JJ

Reply to
J-J
Loading thread data ...

The first question is what inky materials do you have on hand? If you can d issolve one in oil, paraffin, diesel or any mixture of those, great. Last t ime I did this I was using printer's ink plus paraffin. Inks applied in sma ll enough amounts don't need to dry at all, the liquid part just soaks into the paper.

I doubt an ordinary felt tip would work. You could sleeve the tip in plasti c to try it, but I'm not optimistic. Most likely it'll run into the paper, and the paper will tear.

Oh, I remember an ink experiment ... vegetable oil & powder toner. Soot is also usable but not nearly as convenient, as there is the issue of particle size.

Anyway, why not use a biro?

NT

Reply to
tabbypurr

Rubber stamp pad refill ink should work. It would not do to have the stamp pad dry out prematurely. Basically, you need an ink that will not dry out in less time needed for the drum to rotate one full revolution. Graphing barometers are available at varying rotation speeds. The most common is

1 rev = 1 week, but is also available in 1 day and 1 month per revolution.

More: etc...

Forget about changing the type of pen. The arm and pen are part of a carefully balanced mechanism. If you add or reduce weight on the arm, you will need to rebalance the mechanism. A drop of ink in the pen is about as light a pen as could be easily contrived. I would continue to use it.

Sorry. I haven't tried replacing the stock ink well and have no plans on trying to do so.

--
Jeff Liebermann     jeffl@cruzio.com 
150 Felker St #D    http://www.LearnByDestroying.com 
Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com 
Skype: JeffLiebermann     AE6KS    831-336-2558
Reply to
Jeff Liebermann

More of the same:

-- Jeff Liebermann snipped-for-privacy@cruzio.com

150 Felker St #D
formatting link
Santa Cruz CA 95060
formatting link
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558
Reply to
Jeff Liebermann

One more: Note the comment on felt tip pens causing pen drag and slowing response time.

To make a slow dry ink, I would guess that the ink should be high viscosity so that it doesn't drip or run. It should also be high surface tension to slow evaporation. The high surface tension is easy enough by adding a few drops of a wetting agent such as Kodak Photo Flo 200: I don't know how to increase viscosity. Maybe add some more pigment or solids.

--
Jeff Liebermann     jeffl@cruzio.com 
150 Felker St #D    http://www.LearnByDestroying.com 
Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com 
Skype: JeffLiebermann     AE6KS    831-336-2558
Reply to
Jeff Liebermann

As I recall (and as that page states), Photo Flo is a surfactant, which _reduces_ the surface tension of the water. This makes it easier for the water to "wet" the surfaces to which it's applied. The water spreads out more quickly and (as the page says) "promote[s] faster, more uniform drying."

Probably not what you want, if you want ink to stay liquid.

Reply to
Dave Platt

Oops. Surfactants and wetting agents are used to reduce evaporation is correct. However, mangled everything else. To reduce evaporation, surface tension should be lowered, not raised. Surfactants and wetting agents lower surface tension. Adding Photo Flo to the ink will still reduce evaporation, but not in the manner that I originally described.

Study of Surface Tension, Natural Evaporation, and Subcooled Boiling Evaporation of Aqueous Surfactant Solutions

Of course, nothing is simple:

Surface Tension and Evaporation

--
Jeff Liebermann     jeffl@cruzio.com 
150 Felker St #D    http://www.LearnByDestroying.com 
Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com 
Skype: JeffLiebermann     AE6KS    831-336-2558
Reply to
Jeff Liebermann

Sorry to say that this ink isn't working. I filled the little triangular reservoir to the brim and even after a full night, although the drum and chart have rotated, nothing on the paper.

I appreciate these, but the problem is that they are expensive for just tiny amounts. The hope was to try this unit out for a week to make sure it works, then put it up for resale. I suppose if I have no choice, I'll have to go this way though.

Reply to
J-J

I think you might have to wet the tip to get the flow started. Assuming you can swing the pen away from the drum, just touch the tip with a cotton bud or similar wetted with a drop of ink and swing it back immediately. Assuming it is all clean...

Mike.

Reply to
Mike Coon

Interesting, I'll try that today and report back. Thanks.

Reply to
J-J

h
g

Well, the good news is that the ink wasn't dry. I moistened the end of a cotton swab, then touched it to the end of the reservoir and ink immediately started flowing. Moved the reservoir tip back against the drum. Now just waiting on time.

Reply to
J-J

Does the instrument work with genuine barograph recording ink?

What are you using for paper? The real barograph paper is rather absorbent. My closest approximation to a substitute was 20 lb inkjet paper. The common universal variety, that does both inkjet and laser printing is clay coated and will not absorb the ink. Inkjet paper mostly worked, but my results were not very good.

I did some Googling and skimmed some old weather station manuals and books to see if there were any clues as to how to make my own ink. I did find some people online who have done it, but all of them are selling the ink and probably will not divulge their formulation. I haven't had time to search the patents pages. I suspect you might find something there. I can help, but I won't have time for a week or three.

You haven't provided a number which you consider expensive. $8 for a

10ml bottle of ink from Metcheck (plus shipping) is not a huge investment. I think you'll find that the 10 ml bottle will last several years. The recorder takes about 1 drop of ink from an eye dropper to fill. That's about 20 drops per ml or 200 drops per bottle. If your recorder runs for a week, and one drop lasts for a conservative 2 weeks (based on my experience), that's: 2 * 200 / 52 = 7.8 years of operation or about $1/year in ink.
--
Jeff Liebermann     jeffl@cruzio.com 
150 Felker St #D    http://www.LearnByDestroying.com 
Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com 
Skype: JeffLiebermann     AE6KS    831-336-2558
Reply to
Jeff Liebermann

I have no idea. I picked it up at a local estate sale, so wasn't sure it even worked. However, both the timing and barometric pressure are correct, so the biggest hurdles out of the way. There was a red ink track on the barographic chart that was taped on it, but that's all I knew about the ink and not whether or not it worked. I did find out that whoever had it was using the wrong chart with the wrong ranges, however.

A gentleman told me that he uses 11x14 glossy photo paper for his continuously, prints his own charts, and gets excellent results. I don't have any charts other than the one that was already on the unit that had the red trace. If nothing else, I could continue using that for now.

Well, I won't try selling the unit until I have verified that I can get a couple week's worth of correct traces first, so it will just sit as I try different things. The way I have verified it working so far is taking a series of camera shots, one every 30 minutes, then verifying the pressure and time each day after image review. In that way, so far, so good.

Reply to
J-J

g

in

Stamp pad ink has clay in it to help keep the face of the stamps fairly fla t as they wear down.

I would look for ink made for reinking printer ribbons. It has no abrasives that thicken it, and it dries slowly. It was used on dot matrix & daisywhe el printers along with typewriters. I used to reink black ribbons but that was 25 years ago. that ink is oil based, unlike the ink for modern printers with alcohol or other thinning agents.

Reply to
Michael Terrell

I have one that records barometric pressure, temperature, and humidity, and the drum is clockwork.

Reply to
Lucifer

Ok, an update. Unfortunately, here's what happened after trying an oil based ink from Staples. It almost seems like there was a "hemorrhage" of sorts, then almost nothing (in fact, I didn't even realize there was any trace at all until uploading the photo... I did turn the drum a day ahead to get past the huge ink spot):

formatting link

So, I guess it boils down to the incorrect ink, incorrect paper, or both. For the chart, I printed my own on standard 8.5x14 printer/ typing paper. I did back the paper with two pieces of packing tape just in case a spot like the one shown appeared so at least it wouldn't stain the drum.

I'm just not going to be able to get away with testing this thing for under $10, am I?

Reply to
J-J

If you're willing to experiment. I gave you a clay-free rubber stamp ink formula that costs nothing to make. I've not tried it in your app.

NT

Reply to
tabbypurr

Yes, I guess you did. Unfortunately, I don't think I have any of that stuff on hand. All I might be able to obtain is mineral oil later today. Maybe I could try mixing a drop of that with the ink?

Well, the good news is that a VERY thin trace was made over a one day period using nothing other than the Staples oil based ink and my packing taped backed printer paper. Enough of a trace with falling barometric pressure that I could see that the barograph at least works. I would still like to get week's trace out of it though. I suspect the paper I've devised isn't very absorbent, so any cheap modifications I could try in a pinch would be welcome. Perhaps doubling (or tripling) up the sheets next time around?

Reply to
J-J

What's a biro?

Reply to
J-J

All the items mentioned apply.

I was using and recommending ink absorbent paper. According to the above URL, that's wrong. It did work for me, but wasn't very good looking. However, it didn't create a huge ink blob. At this point, I don't know exactly what is wrong. It could be wrong ink, wrong type of paper, bad nib spacing in the pen, bent nibs, etc. Dunno. I don't have a barograph handy for testing.

--
Jeff Liebermann     jeffl@cruzio.com 
150 Felker St #D    http://www.LearnByDestroying.com 
Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com 
Skype: JeffLiebermann     AE6KS    831-336-2558
Reply to
Jeff Liebermann

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.