1. Home
  2. Embedded Linux
  3. Re: All PCs with Intel x86 chips vulnerable to hacking

Re: All PCs with Intel x86 chips vulnerable to hacking

>>>>
formatting link

>>>>> >>>>>
formatting link
>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Nearly all PCs with Intel x86 chips are vulnerable to a new hack. >>>>> >>>>> Intel changing their processors to combat it. >>>>> >>>>> Meanwhile the billion or so PCs out there are vulnerable if running >>>>> windopws infected OSen full of root kits, malware and trojanicking >>>>> fever. >>>>> >>>>> Well... you got Linux and if Linux install is secure then so is >>>>> your PC against this hack. >>>>> >>>>> And since Linux source code is out there for anyone >>>>> to download and modify it to break it, and because no one can >>>>> because its just too good with everyone watching and repairing >>>>> ALL KNOWN BUGs, you are safe converting >>>>> all company PCs and government PCs to run Linux. >>>>> >>>>> Tada! :) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>
formatting link
>>>>>
formatting link
>>>>>
formatting link
>>>> >>>> More reasons the "transgender" ARM will take over! And look at the >>>> Linux support: >>>> >>>>
formatting link
>>>> >>>> Windoze for ARM? Nya .... >>> >>> You're apparently unaware of this but the world has already moved away >>> from x86 to x86-64 and actually _like_ the performance they get out of >>> it. ARM, with its shit performance, can't compete in any way. >> >> You are 1000% wrong troll. >> >> The performance of PC is still stuck around 10MHz bus speed when >> applications such as big data hit the RAM page swapping barrier. > > < snip

Trolls like you should stick to words from books of gynacology.

Read the original post again troll and weep:

You're apparently unaware of this but the world has already moved away > from x86 to x86-64 and actually like the performance they get out of > it. ARM, with its shit performance, can't compete in any way.

You are 1000% wrong troll.

The performance of PC is still stuck around 10MHz bus speed when applications such as big data hit the RAM page swapping barrier.

The ARM is stuck there as well.

Behind a network connection, there is no way to tell which type of PC is doing the processing - all have similar limits.

If ARM processor exits the window manager in Linux and its got 2GB RAM and has SSD, its performance is no different to a PC.

It boots up at the same speed as a PC for starters where these 10MHz bottlenecks can't be overcome.

But ARM delivers all this for a fraction of the power. About 10% of the power required by Intel CPUs.

Datacenters have lots of ARM servers now. You are unlikely to notice the difference.

The very latest ARMs have upped generic IO limit to around 100MHz. But the memory chips to run at those speeds are small and expensive.

The latest Cortex-M4 chips can play Doom for example.

formatting link

Its as fast as the original PC versions of Doom at a fraction of the power and resources, all thanks to its faster bus speeds.

The Cortex-M7 have sound added and runs uCLinux already.

Altogther very interesting the next ARM supercomputer clocking in at around 1W-5W will be.

Reply to
7
Loading thread data ...

It's too bad you can't spell "gynecology." Had you been using Windows, it would have provided you with something Linux has a lot of trouble with: a spellchecker.

I'm not, but it's nice of you to think so, "President" Pig Man.

You mean an x86 processor. Except that we're talking about the x86-64 processors people are putting into their machines now. As it is, not one ARM processor is able to compete with x86-64 processors when it comes to raw performance. ARM processors are ONLY better when it comes to electricity usage because they were designed to save power, not perform. All _reputable_ sites are on my side when it comes to making this claim whereas NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER supports your claim. Here's just one which explains this for you since you're a dumbass

Of course not, that would be inconvenient for someone who lies as profusely as you do!

Except that Intel already has a solution to the competition from ARM in the form of the Intel Atom. Atom delivers superior performance with power consumption which is very close to what ARM delivers. In the end, your beloved ARM looks like a joke.

Of course not, that would make your lie all the more noticeable if I did!

I'm sure that the impressionable Linux losers will believe you but people who actually know a thing or two about processors see right through your idiotic claims and lies. Fuck you and ask your mom for a higher allowance so that you can get out of her basement from time to time.

--
A.M 
99 of 100 computer users agree: Linux sucks 

If ever you meet a Linux advocate who doesn't lie, pinch yourself.
Reply to
A.M

Huzzah! You can!!! :)

Here read the original posta again troll, and weep if you must:

You are 1000% wrong troll.

The performance of PC is still stuck around 10MHz bus speed when applications such as big data hit the RAM page swapping barrier.

The ARM is stuck there as well.

Behind a network connection, there is no way to tell which type of PC is doing the processing - all have similar limits.

If ARM processor exits the window manager in Linux and its got 2GB RAM and has SSD, its performance is no different to a PC.

It boots up at the same speed as a PC for starters where these 10MHz bottlenecks can't be overcome.

But ARM delivers all this for a fraction of the power. About 10% of the power required by Intel CPUs.

Datacenters have lots of ARM servers now. You are unlikely to notice the difference.

The very latest ARMs have upped generic IO limit to around 100MHz. But the memory chips to run at those speeds are small and expensive.

The latest Cortex-M4 chips can play Doom for example.

formatting link

Its as fast as the original PC versions of Doom at a fraction of the power and resources, all thanks to its faster bus speeds.

The Cortex-M7 have sound added and runs uCLinux already.

Altogther very interesting the next ARM supercomputer clocking in at around 1W-5W will be.

Reply to
7
< propaganda >

Unread.

-- A.M

FUN FACT: Cubans would rather risk imprisonment for using Windows than run Linux.

Reply to
A.M

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.