Re: Whoops

On Wed, 09 Jul 2003 06:04:41 GMT, Bucephalis Gave us:

> >> There is a big difference between protocol and etiquette, obvious >> idiot. >Only in spelling.

More proof of your total cluelessness.

Reply to
DarkMatter
Loading thread data ...

you know, these sites aren't really the place for your discussion.....maybe you could try "alt.semantics.whiners.name-calling"? If it doesn't exist, you could always make it up....leave these sites for people actually discussing the intended topics, please.

-Chris

Reply to
Christopher Klassen

Some of us "idiots" top post in hopes that our contribution will actually get read. If somebody's bottom posted at the bottom of a post that they've quoted in its entirety, I usually just skip it, having read that particular post a dozen times already in the thread.

Then there's mid-posting, where each pertinent point is addressed individually. But this is probably too advanced of a concept. I guess I like my audience to be my intellectual equal. This is somewhat akin to finding one specific grain of sand in the Sahara desert, and you can't even use a magnet. (maybe a lantern...)

So, if you don't like top-posting, don't read the posts. I skip over bottom-posts, unless the poster has judiciously excised extraneous material.

Cheers! Rich

Now, you see, you're free to read the background of the post at your leisure -

Reply to
Rich Grise

On Sun, 13 Jul 2003 14:46:20 GMT, "Christopher Klassen" Gave us:

More top posted bullshit from an idiot that has absolutely no clue about usenet. Regardless of the discussions, your blatant ignorance of posting protocols makes you the exact retard I said that you are... It is true. You are that retard. Look the word up, ditz boy.

As far as telling me where to post... Fuck you.

As far as me telling you HOW to post.. . an entirely different animal, you retarded putz!

Reply to
DarkMatter

In article , snipped-for-privacy@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org mentioned...

And you're just as bad, if not worse. Like we need your 'constructive' criticism. FURRFU...

--
@@F@r@o@m@@O@r@a@n@g@e@@C@o@u@n@t@y@,@@C@a@l@,@@w@h@e@r@e@@
###Got a Question about ELECTRONICS?   Check HERE First:###
http://users.pandora.be/educypedia/electronics/databank.htm
My email address is whitelisted.  *All* email sent to it 
goes directly to the trash unless you add NOSPAM in the 
Subject: line with other stuff.  alondra101  hotmail.com
Don't be ripped off by the big book dealers.  Go to the URL
that will give you a choice and save you money(up to half).
http://www.everybookstore.com  You'll be glad you did!
Just when you thought you had all this figured out, the gov't
changed it: http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Units/binary.html@@t@h@e@@a@f@f@l@u@e@n@t@@m@e@e@t@@t@h@e@@E@f@f@l@u@e@n@t@@
Reply to
Watson A.Name - 'Watt Sun'

Yeah, those things have the "Danger of Death" warnings for a good reason .

:)

Solar power is much safer . See

formatting link
for ideas :)

-A

Reply to
Andre

On Mon, 14 Jul 2003 14:06:24 GMT, "Christopher Klassen" Gave us:

Good for you. Take a hike, you f*****ad.

Reply to
DarkMatter

Just ignore DM....he get's more anal and upset about the way someone posts and has to rant and rave using obsenities to tell everyone that they are breaking the rules of Usenet...DM himself (herself, itself?) breaks more "netiquette" rules than those whom he rattles on about.

To prove my point I'm sure DM will respond to this post with a fresh load...

Reply to
Prick

On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 05:54:14 -0700, Watson A.Name - 'Watt Sun' Gave us:

At least you aren't a top posting usenet retard. You are an idiot, however. Announcing kill filter edits is more childish than my "netcop troll" as-it-were posts ever could be, dipshit.

Reply to
DarkMatter

I won't know as I have already plonked him, as should everyone else, the problem will then cease to exist. Let him scream and cry into a vacuum. (Top posted just to get his panties in a bunch) :)

-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----

formatting link
- The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!

-----== Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =-----

Reply to
Larry

Yup, that's the simplest way; I'd all but forgotten him. Course, this thread prompted me to check all the replies and my memory was adequately refreshed. Filter restored, life is good.

--
Rich Webb   Norfolk, VA
Reply to
Rich Webb

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.