Our home was wired for cable TV when we built it18 years ago using RG59
>cable installed before the sheetrock went up. I installed a current
>state of the art cable TV distributution amplifier to make sure we had
>sufficient signal to drive the 6 cable outlets, and it worked fine.
>
>When we upgraded to digital TV this year, I had to buy a new 900 Mhz
>distribution amplifier, but now the higher numbered channels are
>noticably snowy on the two longest cable runs, when viewed on "cable
>ready" sets without a digital set top box.
>
>I could replace those runs with wider bandwith cables, but the only
>reasonable way to do that will be to punch through to the outside of our
>home's walls and run the cables around that way, dammit.
>
>Are there reasonably priced cable TV booster amplifiers with adjustable
>bandwith slopes on the market? I think that could provide a way to live
>with the existing RG59 for a while longer, without overloading the lower
>channels. I don't have access to an RF lab anymore, so I can't easily
>DIY this project.
>
>Thanks guys,
>
>Jeff
Try ChannelPlus. I seem to vaguely remember mention of "tilt" in their literature.
Is your existing cable routed through an attic? If so use the existing RG59 to "pull" good dual(or quad)-braid RG6. The loss difference is substantial.
...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona Voice:(480)460-2350 | |
| Jim-T@analog_innovations.com Fax:(480)460-2142 | Brass Rat |
| http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |
For proper E-mail replies SWAP "-" and "_"
Why is it that Democrats can't debate politely?
And are only rude and interruptive.
Lack of mental capacity?