1. Home
  2. Field-Programmable Gate Arrays
  3. Xilinx ISE vs. SuSE Linux 9.x

Xilinx ISE vs. SuSE Linux 9.x

I'm currently running SuSE Linux SLES8 AMD64, and ISE 6.2 works fine. I'm planning to upgrade to SuSE Linux 9.1 and was wondering if there are reports of the Xilinx tools working there.

-- Steve Williams "The woods are lovely, dark and deep. steve at icarus.com But I have promises to keep,

formatting link
and lines to code before I sleep,
formatting link
And lines to code before I sleep."

Reply to
Stephen Williams
Loading thread data ...

Stephen Williams wrote: >

I did some googling and found some hints that LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.1 is required on SuSE 9.1 and also some newer RedHat releases. Can anyone confirm that will do the trick?

On AMD64?

--
Steve Williams                "The woods are lovely, dark and deep.
steve at icarus.com           But I have promises to keep,
http://www.icarus.com         and lines to code before I sleep,
http://www.picturel.com       And lines to code before I sleep."
Reply to
Stephen Williams

Well, see my previous post about baseX. This is on Fedora Core 2, not Suse, but the kernels/libraries are probably very similar. I am (for historical reasons) running in 32-bit mode, but it's still pretty fast :-)

Note also the DISPLAY variable oddness in my post...

Simon

Reply to
Simon

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.