How detect if MP3 player is recording in your room? [OT]

Suppose someone visited your office or home and tried to make a voice recording using a hidden recorder.

If they used a older-style dictation machine based on tape then you could detect the electromagnetic transmissions from the dictation machine when it was recording.

But how would you detect if someone was secretly recording with an MP3 player that recorded to flash memory?

Is there some transmission which could be detected? Perhaps some low power ultra high frequency from chip refresh cycles?

Reply to
Joey
Loading thread data ...

Tad paranoid here.

Yep

Close. There are devices that are around that do exactly what you want. Security firms and such use them to verify a room is bug free, etc.

Reply to
Dana

Joey wrote

In practice that was always a lot easier to say than to do.

In theory any electronic device will produce some EM so at least in theory that can be detected.

In practice there is so much of that stuff in any normal room anyway that its just not feasible.

Fraid not.

Reply to
Rod Speed

Ok, why do you care? Don't have sensitive conversations with anyone you can't trust, if you're going to be saying anything that shouldn't be recorded.

Doubtful, and not worth the bother when you could just scan them or search them physically.

Scan them or search them. What makes you think you should detect it? Don't they have a right to a recording of any conversation they're participating in?

Do you mean "wild hypothetical way that some future technology or extremely expensive equipment and controlled environment could detect", or do you mean, practically speaking?

... and you're discriminate this from everything else, all other HF noise, how? Get a baseline maybe, but noise is random unless a controlled environment.

You just need to have everyone strip down nude and then do body cavity searches, X-Rays, exploratory surgery, then never let them leave so it doesn't really matter if anything was recorded so long as the environment has sufficient RF shielding.

Reply to
kony

Joey wrote in news:Xns9857E3C284F9E74C1H4@127.0.0.1:

There probably is a little electro magnetic energy leaving the device, but what frequency would you try to find it on? Other electronic things such as computers, printers, etc in the office most likely emit far more RF noise than the MP3 device. It would be hard to find it. Eventually, the power would run down and the thing would stop recording. Someone would have to come by again and pick up the recorder. So your best bet is to be on the lookout for any suspicious recorder placement and pick up activity.

Or just buy as stereo for your office and play it real loud all the time.

Maybe belch and fart a lot too.

SC

Reply to
Slow Code

Joey wrote in news:Xns9857E3C284F9E74C1H4@127.0.0.1:

That should be the least of your worries. What can you do to stop "them"? One word: 'Faraday cage hats'.

--
ybbxvatyvxrnobeantnvayvivatyvxrnurergvpyvfgravatgbneguheyrrerpbeqfznxv
atnyylbhesevraqfsrryfbthvyglnobhggurveplavpvfznaqgurerfgbsgurvetrareng
vbaabgriragurtbireazragnertbaanfgbclbhabjohgnerlbhernqlgborurnegoebxra
Reply to
Mitch Crane

Not really. You could maybe detect that it was turned on with an RF scanner. But if it is low power enough (most MP3 players are, since they are optimised for that) and well shielded, you would likely get nothing in today's RF polluted environment. In addition the attacker may just add some more shielding to be sure. I think you can basically forget about this, unless you can take the devices away from people.

Arno

Reply to
Arno Wagner

Or a noisy computer placed close to where the suspected mp3 recorder would be. I have an ancient 286 whose 80MB hard drive sounds like it's about to take off and its fan is second only to vacuum cleaner on the noise level.

--
When you hear the toilet flush, and hear the words "uh oh", it's already
too late.    - by anonymous Mother in Austin, TX
Spam block in place, no emil reply is expected at all.
Reply to
Impmon

3 AM with the right equipment it would be findable , now are you serious or just another one of "them"?
Reply to
atec77

not sure if you could find it with a metal detector, but probably

NT

Reply to
meow2222

You'd still have to worry about mind reading satellites.

Reply to
Paul Rubin

What is done is to generate a pattern of sound, only part of which is audible, and then detect the low level IF and RF that any sound equipment emits. Then follow the signal detected to its source.

Luck; Ken

Reply to
Ken Maltby

I say things in my conversation which i do not want to be broadcast in the public media.

You say, "search them physically"? I have to tell you that I don;'t work in the sort of environment where that kind of behaviour is considered acceptable!

They have the right to record themselves. I have the right not to have my words broadcast. Unfortunately obtaining redress can be expensive. So prevention is beter than cure.

The latter. I am talking practicalitites ere.

If necessary I could have my PC turned off and my phone put further away. But is there any leakage from solid MP3 recorders?

Reply to
Joey

The situation I describe is where the MP3 plater/recorder is carried by the person.

Reply to
Joey

Nope, I am not one of "them". This is very much for real.

What is "3 AM".

Reply to
Joey

Generate a pattern of sound part of which is inaudible?

IF and RF?

Reply to
Joey

Joey wrote

Then you have a problem for which there is no solution given the other detail below.

Then you have a problem.

Sure, but it just isnt practical.

The short story is that it isnt practical to do what you want to do.

Wouldnt be enough given the minimal leakage from a decently designed solid state MP3 recorder. In spades with one that has been designed to be undetectable.

Corse there is, but the level will be so low that you wont be able to find it with all the other stuff around that is radiating, even if you turn off everything in your house when a visitor shows up.

Reply to
Rod Speed

I'm sure there is a tiny bit, but it cannot be much from such a small device operating off very low voltage and the frequency is an unknown variable. it goes back to the idea about a controlled environment and very expensive equipment, that you'll probably have more background noise than what's coming from the recorder, to find it would entail what amounts to an active search.

Reply to
kony

Joey wrote in news:Xns9858A161645B271F3M4@127.0.0.1:

Would an all nude work environment be acceptable? It would make hiding such devices difficult so you wouldn't have to do anything untoward like searching people.

--
ybbxvatyvxrnobeantnvayvivatyvxrnurergvpyvfgravatgbneguheyrrerpbeqfznxv
atnyylbhesevraqfsrryfbthvyglnobhggurveplavpvfznaqgurerfgbsgurvetrareng
vbaabgriragurtbireazragnertbaanfgbclbhabjohgnerlbhernqlgborurnegoebxra
Reply to
Mitch Crane

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.