sdcc compiler 2.5

i am using sdcc version mcs51/gbz80/z80/avr/ds390/pic14 2.3.0 (Sep 2

2001) (UNIX) and i am facing a problem in finding hex packet. i am using commands:sdcc --debug --stack-after-data --model-larg

--compile-only fnl_fcs.c(......supporting file).

sdcc --debug --stack-after-data --model-large nstl_app_3. fnl_fcs.rel(nstl_app_3.c main file). packihx nstl_app_3.ihx every thing is fine until here (i am getting 24k ihx packet) but when i give packihx nstl_app_3.ihx > nstl_app_3.hex here is the problem and i am getting 20k hex packet which and when loade on chip i am not getting the output. earlier i had got 24k hex packet an had got the o\p .so plz suggest me what might be the problem of this 20 hex packet.

Reply to
basanth
Loading thread data ...

i am using sdcc version mcs51/gbz80/z80/avr/ds390/pic14 2.3.0 (Sep 2

2001) (UNIX) and i am facing a problem in finding hex packet. i am using commands:sdcc --debug --stack-after-data --model-larg

--compile-only fnl_fcs.c(......supporting file).

sdcc --debug --stack-after-data --model-large nstl_app_3. fnl_fcs.rel(nstl_app_3.c main file). packihx nstl_app_3.ihx every thing is fine until here (i am getting 24k ihx packet) but when i give packihx nstl_app_3.ihx > nstl_app_3.hex here is the problem and i am getting 20k hex packet which and when loade on chip i am not getting the output. earlier i had got 24k hex packet an had got the o\p .so plz suggest me what might be the problem of this 20 hex packet. mail to : snipped-for-privacy@autotecemb.com

Reply to
basanth

Not only do you post this message twice in 16 minutes, you also changed the subject, so they are not linked. You also have the gall to imply that people should make email replies to you. Learn how Usenet works before posting again. The following may help:

Some useful links on quoting:

--
 [mail]: Chuck F (cbfalconer at maineline dot net) 
 [page]: 
            Try the download section.
Reply to
CBFalconer

Please don't think me rude. I know a lot of people won't agree with what I have to say but...get a compiler. Ultimately you'll get nowhere with SDCC. Worse still, no one will care. Am I wrong?

--
32°02'14.23"S 115°53'21.30"E
http://www.review-a-gadget.com/
http://www.reviewagadget.com/
http://members.iinet.net.au/~vanluynm/
Reply to
Murray R. Van Luyn.

Dunno. I've got an Infineon C515C (8051-family) gizmo with SDCC as the compiler handling a user interface with a character display and numeric keypad, I/O streams on three UARTS (two on an NXP port expander), a CANbus (bidirectional between the user interface board, several remotes, and a battery monitor/conditioner), doing monitoring of local conditions via the chip's ADC, a PWM for the backlight and indicator LEDs, and a couple of control relays. Works fine.

--
Rich Webb     Norfolk, VA
Reply to
Rich Webb

Sounds pretty impressive Rich. Yep, lots of people swear by SDCC. I meant to stress that a lot of people won't agree with me. I really didn't mean to offend any of those people. Just take a bit of a poke at their tools :-)

Truly though, a really good compiler with good simulator is an absolute pleasure to work with.

Regards, Murray R. Van Luyn.

--
32°02'14.23"S 115°53'21.30"E
http://www.review-a-gadget.com/
http://www.reviewagadget.com/
http://members.iinet.net.au/~vanluynm/
Reply to
Murray R. Van Luyn.

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.