read back 89c51 and 89c52

hi.. does any one know.. how to read a programmed and locked 89c51 and

89c52 without loosing the code..? please inform me on --> snipped-for-privacy@hotmail.com
Reply to
ronydc
Loading thread data ...

Why do you think it was locked in the first place?

This is Usenet. Write here - read here.

Vadim

Reply to
Vadim Borshchev

hi. dear vadim see. at the first place, u dont have to bother "why it is locked". if u know the answer of my question.. then tel me..or continue doing ur work.. and by the way i know.. this is wht.. a"usenet" or what.. so u dont bother too much.. other then showing the method for unlocking the

89c51,89c52. this is "ronydc".
Reply to
ronydc

Yes he does. it is locked so YOU cannot see it.

No, we can also comment on the appropriateness of your request.

And remember usenet is not text messaging so do not use those stupid childish abreviations.

The idiot.

Ian

Reply to
Ian Bell

I don't. But you didn't say why it bothers you.

I perfectly know the answer, but I see no reason to share it.

Yes, it is Usenet and not a mobile phone, spelling is important.

Usenet is free. It is not a customer service, where a paying customer may demand the answers.

HTH,

Vadim

Reply to
Vadim Borshchev

Y.. e.. s..

--
Dan Henry
Reply to
Dan Henry

Posted from Google, the new AOL.

--
Rich Webb   Norfolk, VA
Reply to
Rich Webb

Congrats & deep respect, dear sir!

Reply to
karel

Which gives the rest of us (who use Google occasionally because of near universal access) a bad name.

Sounds like an ID(ten)-T error from the OP

Cheers

PeteS

Reply to
PeteS

For an introduction on the subject:

.
--

Tauno Voipio
tauno voipio (at) iki fi
Reply to
Tauno Voipio

This is the same genius who advertised his capability to explain all the deep dark secrets of the "amaizing" 8051 in another thread.

--
"If you want to post a followup via groups.google.com, don't use
  the broken "Reply" link at the bottom of the article.  Click on
  "show options" at the top of the article, then click on the
  "Reply" at the bottom of the article headers." - Keith Thompson
More details at:
Reply to
Chuck F.

so.. dear dear.. . "vadim"(..who gave u this name..? ha ha ha..) here i wished to meet the genious people, who dont care for the reasons and lenguages and spellings.. but show there capability in solving some one's problem.. in reply of my firstly asked qiestion..if u would have concentreted on the problem.. and if would have shown the solution.. many many people could have taken advantage ..(if u are knowing anything about reading locked 89c51) but u wested ur energy and all others time ..in asking stupid questions.. so.. be serious and tel if u know. anything. to the forum .or give up..

--- ronydc.

Reply to
ronydc

hi.. dan.

can u plz inform me about the method of reading 89c51 and 89c52 please..? u can send an e-mail at snipped-for-privacy@hotmail.com also. please do the needful sir...i am a firmware engineer and stuck badly due to this problem. ronydc.

Reply to
ronydc

ronydc wrote: but u wested ur energy and all

The only one asking stupid questions is you.

Ian

Reply to
Ian Bell

Poor despicable creature. Unable to steal other peoples work, due to ignorance and lack of ethics. In sympathy we can award the Royal Order of the PLONK.

--
"If you want to post a followup via groups.google.com, don't use
  the broken "Reply" link at the bottom of the article.  Click on
  "show options" at the top of the article, then click on the
  "Reply" at the bottom of the article headers." - Keith Thompson
More details at:
Reply to
Chuck F.

As the next step you would probably hack my machine. Ok, my IP address is

127.0.0.1

*plonk*

Reply to
Vadim Borshchev

127.0.0.1

so shameful....but god have given me a lot of other powers like ..-- helping others.. i think.. u are legging in those things..so that u thought by this way..

Reply to
ronydc

"ronydc" schreef in bericht news: snipped-for-privacy@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...

is 127.0.0.1

PLONK!

--
Thanks, Frank.
(remove 'q' and '.invalid' when replying by email)
Reply to
Frank Bemelman

ha .. ha.. ha.. poor basterd.. not knowing what is his IP address.... haa ha haaaa...

Reply to
ronydc

You are much too kind. That could have very easily been (and was my first reaction):

WTF? *PLONK!*

--
Dan Henry
Reply to
Dan Henry

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.