OT: Dontronics Web Site

Hi,

I have not been able to get onto the dontronics web site for the last four or five days, cannot find an email address in some of Don's replies as it seems linked to the web site Contacted my ISP so if you are watching Don ?? the reply I received from them is below. cheers Cam.

Thank you for your online support request.

I am able to view the website you reported OK down this end. I believe the problem you are experiencing is part of a larger problem Internode has encountered over recent months.

The problem affects customers who are on a particular IP address range with Internode. This is not a problem with Internode itself but with the particular websites.

Internode has an advisory on our website about the issue:

formatting link

I will add this support request to the others that we are currently looking into and hopefully we will be able to get this website to change its configuration to ensure its correct functionality.

Reply to
Cam
Loading thread data ...

Hi Cam, I'll forward you an email from an address you can reply to, so you don't have to go through the email web contact page.

The Dontronics site is on a US server, along with

formatting link
e-dotcom.com etc, and 3 other domains we have.

Our sales dept. email goes through internode Australia, and must be able to interact with dontronics.com web site, so I find this hard to understand.

I don't know if anyone else is experiencing problems or not.

Don...

--
Don McKenzie
E-Mail Contact Page:       http://www.e-dotcom.com/ecp.php?un=Dontronics
 Click to see the full signature
Reply to
Don McKenzie

Cam, here is the immediate answer I got back from my web host.

=======================================

Don McKenzie wrote: Some customers experiencing issues with some websites

Don,

The problem seems to be on there end not ours, what you are going to have to do is get your customer to get his ISP to assign him a new IP address.

Regards,

Adam Regards,

Adam

Ticket ID: KMF-70479 Tracking URL: Click Here Department: AffordableHost - Support Created On: 12 May 2005 05:38 PM Last Update: 12 May 2005 05:38 PM Status: Closed

--
Don McKenzie
E-Mail Contact Page:       http://www.e-dotcom.com/ecp.php?un=Dontronics
 Click to see the full signature
Reply to
Don McKenzie

do

Why should the ***customer's*** IP address have anything to do with it? Does the host not serve all IP addresses equally?

Mark Borgerson

Reply to
Mark Borgerson

Some ISPs are major sources of spam, spew, or virus-spreading zombies and refuse to clean up their act. Because of this they find that the IP addresses they use get blocked by other nodes on the Net. Non-spamming customers of that ISP get blocked as well.

Reply to
invalid

This is good news! If the ISP's that permit spamming are getting blocked we may see a slowdown (I am not naive enough to think it is the end) of Spam. It is a pity more direct, and faster, action can not be taken. Apparently the majority of it emanates from Florida though I seem to get a fair bit from Russia.

/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\ \/\/\/\/\ Chris Hills Staffs England /\/\/\/\/\ /\/\/ snipped-for-privacy@phaedsys.org

formatting link
\/\/ \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/

Reply to
Chris Hills

This is a problem, too. The ISP's blocking address ranges seem to block also supposedly unused address ranges (e.g. 85.x.y.z). This killed my new (and totally respectable IP) from some routers. I had to VPN to my other site with an 80.x.y.z-series address to get ny the blocking.

The blockers should have a clue before doing anything radical.

--
Tauno Voipio
tauno voipio (at) iki fi
 Click to see the full signature
Reply to
Tauno Voipio

I agree. A very extreme example is Verizon. They seem to block all traffic from Europe. It happened quite a few times that a customer from the USA sent me an e-mail with a support question regarding our products and I couldn't answer him because he was with Verizon. Every reply bounced.

Meindert

Reply to
Meindert Sprang

That's what is happening when I try to email Don by replying to his direct email. No joy on this one. I still cannot connect. If you read this Don could you get your ISP to read the information in the link I originally posted, and if possible talk to Internode.

thanks Cameron

Reply to
Cam

Why don't you do a traceroute and figure out where it dies, then do an nslookup on that IP address? Figure out where it's broken!

-->Neil

Reply to
Neil Bradley

Cam, I have sent you a message with a clean email reply address that doesn't go through the system, so you can communicate directly with me.

Can you try what Neil suggests above?

Unfortunately, blocking IP addresses isn't the way to get rid of spam.

I am also waiting on a response from my message to my web host below:

Don...

Web Host Ticket message: ====================================

Hi Adam, as this thread was started and is still running in a newsgroup, can you please clarify for me if you are blocking 58.0.0.0/8 and/or 59.0.0.0/8.

If you are not, then why would the customer need a new IP address?

If you are, can you please explain why you are blocking it.

Thanks in advance, Cheers Don...

--
Don McKenzie
E-Mail Contact Page:       http://www.e-dotcom.com/ecp.php?un=Dontronics
 Click to see the full signature
Reply to
Don McKenzie

nslookup

Here are the results. I'm not 100% sure on how to interpret them, but doing an nslookup on the last IP addr in the output just seems to state the obvious. I guess when your blocked, that's it ?

e:\embedded\bin>tracert dontronics.com

Tracing route to dontronics.com [209.9.226.66] over a maximum of 30 hops:

1 * * * Request timed out. 2 17 ms 20 ms 20 ms loop0.lns1.mel2.internode.on.net [150.101.212.16] 3 19 ms 20 ms 19 ms gi0-1-3.cor2.mel2.agile.on.net [150.101.212.115] 4 20 ms 20 ms 27 ms gi2-4.cor1.mel3.internode.on.net [150.101.212.162] 5 30 ms 34 ms 32 ms pos1-2.bdr1.syd6.agile.on.net [203.16.212.237] 6 205 ms 206 ms 206 ms pos1-0.bdr1.lax1.agile.on.net [203.16.213.149] 7 198 ms 197 ms 198 ms GigabitEthernet3-2.GW1.LAX15.ALTER.NET [208.222.8.93] 8 205 ms 206 ms 206 ms 0.so-2-0-0.CL1.LAX15.ALTER.NET [152.63.115.210] 9 197 ms 198 ms 199 ms 0.so-4-1-0.XL1.LAX7.ALTER.NET [152.63.117.118] 10 199 ms 199 ms 199 ms 0.so-6-1-0.BR1.LAX7.ALTER.NET [152.63.113.1] 11 209 ms 206 ms 207 ms 204.255.168.30 12 208 ms 208 ms 207 ms tbr2-p012101.la2ca.ip.att.net [12.123.29.6] 13 249 ms 247 ms 249 ms tbr2-cl2.sl9mo.ip.att.net [12.122.10.13] 14 252 ms 249 ms 251 ms tbr1-cl2.sl9mo.ip.att.net [12.122.9.141] 15 266 ms 264 ms 267 ms tbr1-cl4.wswdc.ip.att.net [12.122.10.29] 16 260 ms 259 ms 257 ms gar1-p300.ascva.ip.att.net [12.123.8.49] 17 267 ms 270 ms 265 ms att-peer.er1.iad1.ptptech.net [209.9.224.154] 18 * * * Request timed out. ........... 30 * * * Request timed out.

Trace complete.

e:\embedded\bin>nslookup 209.9.224.154 Server: resolv.internode.on.net Address: 192.231.203.132

Name: att-peer.er1.iad1.ptptech.net Address: 209.9.224.154

Reply to
Cam

...

Here is what I get:

tracert dontronics.com

... 6 att-level3-oc48.SanJose1.Level3.net [209.0.227.30] 7 tbr1-p012201.sffca.ip.att.net [12.123.13.189] 8 tbr1-cl2.sl9mo.ip.att.net [12.122.10.41] 9 tbr1-cl4.wswdc.ip.att.net [12.122.10.29] 10 gar1-p300.ascva.ip.att.net [12.123.8.49] 11 att-peer.er1.iad1.ptptech.net [209.9.224.154] 12 titan.genwebhost.com [209.9.226.66]

Trace complete.

So, comparing the two, I see:

YOU > 16 gar1-p300.ascva.ip.att.net [12.123.8.49] ME | 10 gar1-p300.ascva.ip.att.net [12.123.8.49]

YOU > 17 att-peer.er1.iad1.ptptech.net [209.9.224.154] ME | 11 att-peer.er1.iad1.ptptech.net [209.9.224.154]

YOU > 18 Request timed out. ME | 12 titan.genwebhost.com [209.9.226.66]

So why can I get from 209.9.224.154 to 209.9.226.66 and you can't?

Would you be so kind as to ping 209.9.224.154 and 209.9.226.66 and report the results?

Lets look at possible blocking:

Your NNTP-Posting-Host is 59.167.68.200, which is ppp68-200.lns1.mel2.internode.on.net. I am assuming that this is #1 on your tracert.

#2 on your tracert is 150.101.212.16, which is loop0.lns1.mel2.internode.on.net

Let's look at them all at

formatting link

150.101.212.16 not listed in bl.spamcop.net 150.101.212.16 not listed in dnsbl.njabl.org 150.101.212.16 not listed in dnsbl.njabl.org 150.101.212.16 not listed in cbl.abuseat.org 150.101.212.16 not listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net 150.101.212.16 not listed in relays.ordb.org.

59.167.68.200 not listed in bl.spamcop.net

59.167.68.200 not listed in dnsbl.njabl.org 59.167.68.200 not listed in dnsbl.njabl.org 59.167.68.200 not listed in cbl.abuseat.org 59.167.68.200 not listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net 59.167.68.200 not listed in relays.ordb.org.

209.9.224.154 not listed in bl.spamcop.net

209.9.224.154 not listed in dnsbl.njabl.org 209.9.224.154 not listed in dnsbl.njabl.org 209.9.224.154 not listed in cbl.abuseat.org 209.9.224.154 not listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net 209.9.224.154 not listed in relays.ordb.org.

209.9.226.66 not listed in bl.spamcop.net

209.9.226.66 not listed in dnsbl.njabl.org 209.9.226.66 not listed in dnsbl.njabl.org 209.9.226.66 not listed in cbl.abuseat.org 209.9.226.66 not listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net 209.9.226.66 not listed in relays.ordb.org.

OK, so nobody on either end is on a common block list.

I am stumped.

Reply to
Guy Macon

Route tracing seems not be reliable here. My traceroute (from Linux, Windows and OSX) get killed at att-peer.er1.iad1.ptptech.net, but pings and web accesses to dontronics.com do work.

--
Tauno Voipio
tauno voipio (at) iki fi
 Click to see the full signature
Reply to
Tauno Voipio

Cam wrote: > Hi Don, >

Hi Cam, my results are below, so it looks to me like it is my host that is blocking your attempts to my site.

we both have 18 nodes, well you get to 18 before it times out. And our nodes 15, 16, and 17 are exactly the same. Node 15 is WASHINGTON D.C.

I am still waiting on my host to answer the ticket I submitted. First time up they were very quick, not so now.

Cheers Don...

===========================================================

1 - - 192.168.1.101 Melbourne end-617740f074b 2 1 - 10.47.64.1 Unknown 3 2 1 198.142.192.49 12.375S, 130.725E sun2-pos5.gw.optusnet.com.au 4 3 1 211.31.129.57 12.375S, 130.725E sun5-ge4-1.gw.optusnet.com.au 5 3 1 211.31.129.38 12.375S, 130.725E meb1-ge2.gw.optusnet.com.au 6 4 1 203.213.159.194 12.375S, 130.725E meb2-ge4-2.gw.optusnet.com.au 7 5 2 61.88.143.33 Unknown pos5-1.33ebc76fc.optus.net.au 8 6 - 203.208.148.101 Unknown 9 6 3 203.208.168.134 SINGAPORE ge-3-0-0.plapx-ar1.ix.singtel.com 10 7 4 206.24.241.93 Unknown bpr1-ge-4-3-0.paloaltopaix.savvis.net 11 7 4 206.24.211.73 Unknown dcr1-so-3-3-0.sanfranciscosfo.savvis.net 12 8 5 192.205.32.109 San Francisco cw-gw.sffca.ip.att.net 13 9 - 12.122.80.65 Unknown 14 10 5 12.122.10.41 St. Louis tbr1-cl2.sl9mo.ip.att.net 15 11 5 12.122.10.29 WASHINGTON D.C. tbr1-cl4.wswdc.ip.att.net 16 12 5 12.123.8.49 Unknown gar1-p300.ascva.ip.att.net 17 13 6 209.9.224.154 Unknown att-peer.er1.iad1.ptptech.net 18 14 7 209.9.226.66 Unknown titan.genwebhost.com

====================================================

Cam:

Tracing route to dontronics.com [209.9.226.66] over a maximum of 30 hops:

1 * * * Request timed out. 2 17 ms 20 ms 20 ms loop0.lns1.mel2.internode.on.net [150.101.212.16] 3 19 ms 20 ms 19 ms gi0-1-3.cor2.mel2.agile.on.net [150.101.212.115] 4 20 ms 20 ms 27 ms gi2-4.cor1.mel3.internode.on.net [150.101.212.162] 5 30 ms 34 ms 32 ms pos1-2.bdr1.syd6.agile.on.net [203.16.212.237] 6 205 ms 206 ms 206 ms pos1-0.bdr1.lax1.agile.on.net [203.16.213.149] 7 198 ms 197 ms 198 ms GigabitEthernet3-2.GW1.LAX15.ALTER.NET [208.222.8.93] 8 205 ms 206 ms 206 ms 0.so-2-0-0.CL1.LAX15.ALTER.NET [152.63.115.210] 9 197 ms 198 ms 199 ms 0.so-4-1-0.XL1.LAX7.ALTER.NET [152.63.117.118] 10 199 ms 199 ms 199 ms 0.so-6-1-0.BR1.LAX7.ALTER.NET [152.63.113.1] 11 209 ms 206 ms 207 ms 204.255.168.30 12 208 ms 208 ms 207 ms tbr2-p012101.la2ca.ip.att.net [12.123.29.6] 13 249 ms 247 ms 249 ms tbr2-cl2.sl9mo.ip.att.net [12.122.10.13] 14 252 ms 249 ms 251 ms tbr1-cl2.sl9mo.ip.att.net [12.122.9.141] 15 266 ms 264 ms 267 ms tbr1-cl4.wswdc.ip.att.net [12.122.10.29] 16 260 ms 259 ms 257 ms gar1-p300.ascva.ip.att.net [12.123.8.49] 17 267 ms 270 ms 265 ms att-peer.er1.iad1.ptptech.net [209.9.224.154] 18 * * * Request timed out. ........... 30 * * * Request timed out.

Trace complete.

--
Don McKenzie
E-Mail Contact Page:       http://www.e-dotcom.com/ecp.php?un=Dontronics
 Click to see the full signature
Reply to
Don McKenzie

Guy Macon wrote

thanks for your efforts, ping results are

e:\embedded\bin>ping 209.9.224.154

Pinging 209.9.224.154 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 209.9.224.154: bytes=32 time=262ms TTL=246 Reply from 209.9.224.154: bytes=32 time=260ms TTL=246 Reply from 209.9.224.154: bytes=32 time=260ms TTL=246 Reply from 209.9.224.154: bytes=32 time=260ms TTL=246

Ping statistics for 209.9.224.154: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 260ms, Maximum = 262ms, Average = 260ms

e:\embedded\bin>ping 209.9.226.66

Pinging 209.9.226.66 with 32 bytes of data:

Request timed out. Request timed out. Request timed out. Request timed out.

Ping statistics for 209.9.226.66: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 0, Lost = 4 (100% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms

cheers Cameron

Reply to
Cam

I can ping both, so we know they both respond to pings. Looks like 209.9.226.66 is blocking you and not me.

That's all we can do from here; now it is up to Don's ISP.

BTW, I have had my employer purchase many dontronics products and my experience has been that they sit there quietly doing what they were designed to do without ever giving you any trouble. (My only connection to dontronics is as a happy customer).

Reply to
Guy Macon

OK, I have their full attention now Cam, so we may get a resolution. Latest ticket text from my web host below: Check your IP address as Jeff has indicated below, and I will pass it on.

See how we go from there.

Don...

=============================================================== Some customers experiencing issues with some websites

Don,

I have seen this issue on one other hosting server within the system.

This may be related to a resolution problem between the ISP connection and the server. Please provide the IP address that is experiencing the issue and I will attempt to research the connectivity between the connection and the server.

Please have those affected by this issue visit the following page to retrieve their IP address.

formatting link

Thanks

Jeff

If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to ask.

Thanks, Jeff

--
Don McKenzie
E-Mail Contact Page:       http://www.e-dotcom.com/ecp.php?un=Dontronics
 Click to see the full signature
Reply to
Don McKenzie

Got a big message from Cam's ISP, which I also happen to have 2 individual accounts with.

This is the short version, but it defines the problem:

=================================================== We've recently received an allocation of IPv4 address space from APNIC which has been drawn from 59.0.0.0/8, which was previously marked by IANA as "reserved".

IANA redesignated it (along with 58.0.0.0/8) nearly a year ago. Nevertheless, we're finding that a number of network operators have continued to block those addresses in their bogon filters. ===================================================

I now have an email address for Cam's ISP, I have to link this up with my web host, so we don't have to go through the web form ticket system. This may be a feat in itself. :-)

Of course, spam destroyed the ability for web hosts to communicate readily with each other. :-(

Don...

--
Don McKenzie
E-Mail Contact Page:       http://www.e-dotcom.com/ecp.php?un=Dontronics
 Click to see the full signature
Reply to
Don McKenzie

Aha!!!

Finally a solution:

============================================== From my web host: I have cleared the IP address and block setting from the bogon filters within the hosting server, please let me know if this does not correct the issue. ==============================================

and it only took 6 days to convince them that they were wrong. all working now.

Don...

D> Cam wrote:

--
Don McKenzie
E-Mail Contact Page:       http://www.e-dotcom.com/ecp.php?un=Dontronics
 Click to see the full signature
Reply to
Don McKenzie

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.