Free embedded realtime software & docs

You are such a stupid tool. Go away with your stupid viruses!

Pal I'm 40 years old. I've been professionally employed in Research positions in the computer industry since 1990. I have very little interest in taking over the web from my homepage, but It did make me laugh quite a bit.

More to the point, I'm not faking anything or doing anything that a million other people haven't already done on the web/internet.

Regards.

Your website is unusable. All that turns up in Firefox is a few coloured rectangles. With Opera, some information is visible, but it looks so bad I have no interest in looking further. Here's a few clues for you (and anyone else making websites). Drop the "browser detection" drivel - code to proper standards, and check with proper tools. Don't use javascript unless it really adds something to the site - and even then, make it navigable without it. Drop background pictures - they make text harder to read. Don't use light-on-dark text, it is hard to read. Don't use badly scaled images instead of text. If it is a professional website, don't use blatant freebee sites with adverts or stupid pictures. And don't spam a range of newsgroups with adverts for your commercial sites. If you are offering some information of interest to these groups, post a link to that information, and let the user then navigate to your commercial pages from there.

I'm sure you have plenty of interesting information to share with people, but your current site does not do that.

mvh.,

David

I can read it OK (IE6)

Clearly you are not using God's Own Web Browser! :-)

Couldn't agree more

Well said... Too may forget the basics.

Yes it detracts and people thing it is not professional

I agree. If you have something of interest to a discussion then post a link. There are people from most tool/compiler companies lurking on here as well as many distributors. Imagine what it would be like if they all started to drop in commercials.

Hello folks,

Chris Hills schrieb:

I can't see any text either on Firefox 2.x or IE6. But there is kind of a content on dmctek.googlepages.com/index.html, but th enavigation is broken and no Name and contact info to be found.

This can't be professional!

Take care.

In article , Martin Raabe writes

Well yes it can... There are many people in the embedded world who are very good but have no real idea when it comes to web stuff. (I bought in a template because it was a bit beyond me)

The OP may not realise what is required, or rather what should be avoided to work in most browsers. I tend to have the settings on my web authoring tool set to permit 90% of browsers and test on three browsers. IE, Netscape (an old one) and Safari.

However it is not professional to not check if your web site works with several browsers in your target market.

As one who is often critisied for the design of my site...... :o)

Using IE6 I find I can brows all pages, but the menu on the left only works from the main page, but this does not really cause a problem. Using FF 2 the menu on the left does not work.

There is not much to see anyway.

Obviously its an IE only website. This is what David explained an what needs to be avoided for any information that you want to show to decent addressees.

-Michael

And thin skined too.

IE6 is probably the worst 'checking' browser possible.

Why?

In article , Michael Schnell writes

That's good coming from someone with an aol address :-)

:) :) :) It's intended to confuse the spammers' search engines not the readers :) :) :)

-Michael

Getting way way off topic, but...I actually use Browser Cam. This does not help however when people choose to turn off Javascript.

In article , Michael Schnell writes

Actually it looks like a VERY good idea! I might to that to mine. Most of the spam comes out of the US so why shouldn't it go back to AOL :-)

Microsoft is not well known for standard conformance :-).

Paul

In article , Paul Keinanen writes

Ok Why IE6 specifically? As opposed to IE generically of IE7

however these days its compilers are quite good... though with C#, C++/CLI they seem to be trying to take over.

Because the OP (snipped) specified it.

the 'from' and the 'reply-to' content.