1. Home
  2. Hobby Electronics Basics
  3. A little help with some basic calculus

A little help with some basic calculus

Okay, this is a homework problem, but I'm middle-aged and already have my B.A., and just returning to school to pick up a little more knowledge. Besides, you can clearly see (below) that I'm giving this my best shot. So, someone please help me out here. For a basic electronics class, we are given that the temperature coefficient for the resistance of a material is given by:

a (for alpha) = (1/R)(dR/dT), and we are asked to show that:

R2 = {[ 1 + a(T1 - Ts) ] / [1 + a(T2 - Ts)]} R2

where Ts is the "reference temperature".

But here is how the math works out for me:

a = (1/R)(dR/dT)

dR/R = a dT Take indefinite integral of both sides....

ln R = a T + Ts, where Ts is said reference temperature

Assume R1 corresponds to T1, and R2 to T2, then....

ln R1 = a T1 + Ts, and ln R2 = a T2 + Ts

ln R1 - ln R2 = a (T1 - T2), so Ts is already gone.

ln (R1/R2) = a (T1 - T2), exponentiate both sides...

R1/R2 = exp (a [T1 - T2])

exp x is approximately 1 + x, so we have,

R1 = R2 { (1 + a [T1 - T2]) }, which is not the professor's desired result. Did the professor screw up, or have I forgotten some basic calculus or algebra in twenty years since college? Thanks in advance for all replies....

Steve O.

"Spying On The College Of Your Choice" -- How to pick the college that is the Best Match for a high school student's needs.

formatting link

Reply to
Steven O.
Loading thread data ...

This is wrong. The constant of integration isn't Ts.

Your maths looks fine to me, apart from that constant of integration - which cancels-out anyway

Maybe your teacher did it this way :

[ ln R ] Limits Rs -> R = [ aT ] Limits Ts -> T

ln (R1/Rs) = a[T1-Ts] ln (R2/Rs) = a[T2-Ts]

R1/Rs = exp( a[T1-Ts] ) R2/Rs = exp( a[T1-Ts] )

If we apply the approximation now ...

R1/Rs ~ 1 + a[T1-Ts] eqn 1 R2/Rs ~ 1 + a[T1-Ts] eqn 2

Divide eqn 1 / eqn 2

R1/R2 = { 1 + a[T1-Ts] } / { 1 + a[T2-Ts] }

Reply to
Andrew Holme

On Sun, 06 Feb 2005 04:57:47 GMT, Steven O. wrote: If I follow the intent, I get:

dR/R = a dT ln R + C1 = a*T + C2 ln R = a*T + C2 - C1 ln R = a*T + C

solve C for initial conditions, which is Rref and Tref

C = ln Rref - a*Tref

Plugging back in, we get:

ln R = a*T + ln Rref - a*Tref ln R = a*T - a*Tref + ln Rref ln R = a*(T - Tref) + ln Rref ln R - ln Rref = a*(T-Tref) ln (R/Rref) = a*(T-Tref) R/Rref = e^(a*(T-Tref)) R/Rref = e^(a*T)/e^(a*Tref)

or,

R/Rref = A*e^(a*T), where A = e^(-a*Tref)

I think that puts me in rough agreement with you, to this point. Substituting

1+x for e^x:

R/Rref = (1+a*(T-Tref)) R = RRef * (1+a*(T-Tref))

I suppose if there were two different R's, say R1 and R2, then their ratio would be:

R1/R2 = [RRef * (1+a*(T1-Tref))] / [RRef * (1+a*(T2-Tref))] R1/R2 = [(1+a*(T1-Tref))] / [(1+a*(T2-Tref))]

That would look about like your teacher's ratio, wouldn't it?

Jon

Reply to
Jonathan Kirwan

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.