![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Re: Turn your mercedes-benz into a hybrid vehicle ...
| Michael A. Terr... | 06-04-2009 |
If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
The photo indicates that it is patented but I'm having trouble finding
anything in the USPTO.
Could you post the patent number?
Thanks in advance.
Bret Cahill
On Mon, 1 Jun 2009 22:34:06 -0700 (PDT), Bret Cahill
---
Still???
JF
Here, you try to find it:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&ssPageName=STRK:MESELX:...
Go to the OP if that link doesn't work
The box had "Patented" on it.
It's hard to believe but some posters are so dumb they try to claim
they have patents when that's the easiest thing to check to prove they
are frauds.
You wouldn't know any dunces on sci.electronics.basics who are so
stupid they claim they have patents in their name when the USPTO has
no record of that name, do you?
Someone that dumb would do well to post under a handle.
Bret Cahill
On Tue, 2 Jun 2009 08:38:02 -0700 (PDT), Bret Cahill
---
Nope, but I know of _one_ who's so abysmally stupid that he doesn't even
know how to search by the inventor's name and blames his stupidity on
everyone else.
Try: IN/"Fields, III; John B."
---
---
Sounds OK to me; I suggest you try "pendejo"
JF
Well, I can understand why you only have one patent. The one you have
is so worthless there is no way anyone could call you an inventor.
It's easy to unnerstand how the toy company went out of business.
Anyway, if it'll make you feel better, you can resume typing "LOL!"
Bret Cahill
anything in the USPTO.
Could you post the patent number?
Thanks in advance.
Bret Cahill
On Mon, 1 Jun 2009 22:34:06 -0700 (PDT), Bret Cahill
>The photo indicates that it is patented but I'm having trouble finding
>anything in the USPTO.
>anything in the USPTO.
---
Still???
JF
> >The photo indicates that it is patented but I'm having trouble finding
> >anything in the USPTO.
> >anything in the USPTO.
> Still???
Here, you try to find it:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&ssPageName=STRK:MESELX:...
Go to the OP if that link doesn't work
The box had "Patented" on it.
It's hard to believe but some posters are so dumb they try to claim
they have patents when that's the easiest thing to check to prove they
are frauds.
You wouldn't know any dunces on sci.electronics.basics who are so
stupid they claim they have patents in their name when the USPTO has
no record of that name, do you?
Someone that dumb would do well to post under a handle.
Bret Cahill
On Tue, 2 Jun 2009 08:38:02 -0700 (PDT), Bret Cahill
>> >The photo indicates that it is patented but I'm having trouble finding
>> >anything in the USPTO.
>> >anything in the USPTO.
>> Still???
>Here, you try to find it:
>http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&ssPageName=STRK:MESELX:...
>Go to the OP if that link doesn't work
>The box had "Patented" on it.
>It's hard to believe but some posters are so dumb they try to claim
>they have patents when that's the easiest thing to check to prove they
>are frauds.
>You wouldn't know any dunces on sci.electronics.basics who are so
>stupid they claim they have patents in their name when the USPTO has
>no record of that name, do you?
>http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&ssPageName=STRK:MESELX:...
>Go to the OP if that link doesn't work
>The box had "Patented" on it.
>It's hard to believe but some posters are so dumb they try to claim
>they have patents when that's the easiest thing to check to prove they
>are frauds.
>You wouldn't know any dunces on sci.electronics.basics who are so
>stupid they claim they have patents in their name when the USPTO has
>no record of that name, do you?
---
Nope, but I know of _one_ who's so abysmally stupid that he doesn't even
know how to search by the inventor's name and blames his stupidity on
everyone else.
Try: IN/"Fields, III; John B."
---
>Someone that dumb would do well to post under a handle.
---
Sounds OK to me; I suggest you try "pendejo"
JF
> >> >The photo indicates that it is patented but I'm having trouble finding
> >> >anything in the USPTO.
> >> Still???
> >> >anything in the USPTO.
> >> Still???
> >Here, you try to find it:
> >http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&ssPageName=STRK:MESELX:...
> >Go to the OP if that link doesn't work
> >The box had "Patented" on it.
> >It's hard to believe but some posters are so dumb they try to claim
> >they have patents when that's the easiest thing to check to prove they
> >are frauds.
> >You wouldn't know any dunces on sci.electronics.basics who are so
> >stupid they claim they have patents in their name when the USPTO has
> >no record of that name, do you?
> >http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&ssPageName=STRK:MESELX:...
> >Go to the OP if that link doesn't work
> >The box had "Patented" on it.
> >It's hard to believe but some posters are so dumb they try to claim
> >they have patents when that's the easiest thing to check to prove they
> >are frauds.
> >You wouldn't know any dunces on sci.electronics.basics who are so
> >stupid they claim they have patents in their name when the USPTO has
> >no record of that name, do you?
> ---
> Nope, but I know of _one_ who's so abysmally stupid that he doesn't even
> know how to search by the inventor's name and blames his stupidity on
> everyone else.
> Try: IN/"Fields, III; John B."
> Nope, but I know of _one_ who's so abysmally stupid that he doesn't even
> know how to search by the inventor's name and blames his stupidity on
> everyone else.
> Try: IN/"Fields, III; John B."
Well, I can understand why you only have one patent. The one you have
is so worthless there is no way anyone could call you an inventor.
It's easy to unnerstand how the toy company went out of business.
Anyway, if it'll make you feel better, you can resume typing "LOL!"
Bret Cahill
- about quick turn high quality pcb manufacture(Low Price)
- July 13, 2006, 1:59 am
- Low Price quick turn RoHS pcb prototype manfuacturer!!!(NJPCB)
- August 13, 2006, 11:38 pm
- Low Price Quick turn RoHS pcb prototype manufacturer(NJPCB)
- August 16, 2006, 2:08 am
- Automotive - using turn signals as combo turn signals and running lights
- December 15, 2004, 10:42 pm
- LED's on a vehicle
- January 19, 2006, 4:02 pm
- Vehicle detector
- September 12, 2006, 4:52 pm
- Vehicle control design
- November 2, 2007, 7:57 am
- Help: Can someone assist with load resistor calculation for vehicle LED lamp please?
- June 4, 2008, 1:44 pm
- Design of Electronic Vehicle Anti-theft Gadget
- November 11, 2009, 5:46 pm
- Turn On PC remotely?
- November 21, 2005, 8:49 am
- atx power supply turn on
- July 5, 2006, 8:40 pm
- atx power supply turn on
- July 5, 2006, 8:46 pm
- Re: Turn 12 dollars into thousands
- September 23, 2007, 2:27 pm
- Turn off delay circuit
- March 25, 2009, 10:19 pm
- TURN YOUR INVENTIONS INTO TAX SHELTERS
- September 4, 2009, 1:57 pm








> Save fuel, more horse power, Mercedes-benz's are highly safe car, don't
> settle for unsafe vehicle.