Please Register and login to reply and use other advanced options
said that electric motors can be reversed, which means that they have
as much 'stopping potential' as they have starting potential.
============================================
Yep, if you can spin the wheels at start up then you can apply
the same torque stopping them. However, braking does a better
job in an emergency because most brakes can lock the wheels
even when the motive power is insufficient to spin the wheels at
startup.
No, I'm not wrong. Regenerative braking is a real effect, and with a
smart controller you will avoid losing traction.
I'm not saying it is a trivial matter to set up such a system but
there's nothing that prohibits it.
============================================
It's as simple as it can be, actually. The back-emf that the motor
generates limits the current and if you drive the motor faster
through the shaft the current reverses, which is exactly what you
want to recharge a battery.
You do not need to reverse the direction of the motor.
For a vehicle the energy losses are overcoming air resistance
and bearing/gearbox friction. Any braking is an additional loss
as heat which cannot be recovered.
There are cables and there are cables. And we are not exerting tons of
force in this application.
-tg
===============================================
You seem to be trying to educate a complete idiot. Good luck!
- Re: Fuel Savings from Roadbed Electrification Pays for the PowerPlant In 14 Months
- May 30, 2009, 2:40 pm
- Re: Fuel Savings from Roadbed Electrification Pays for the PowerPlant In 14 Months
- May 30, 2009, 5:13 pm
- Re: Fuel Savings from Roadbed Electrification Pays for the PowerPlant In 14 Months
- May 30, 2009, 5:17 pm
- Re: Fuel Savings from Roadbed Electrification Pays for the PowerPlant In 14 Months
- June 5, 2009, 2:35 pm
- Re: Fuel Savings from Roadbed Electrification Pays for the PowerPlant In 14 Months
- June 6, 2009, 1:28 pm
- Re: Fuel Savings from Roadbed Electrification Pays for the Power Plant In 14 Months
- May 30, 2009, 2:39 pm
- Re: Fuel Savings from Roadbed Electrification Pays for the Power Plant In ?14 Months
- May 30, 2009, 2:42 pm
- Re: Fuel Savings from Roadbed Electrification Pays for the Power Plant In 14 Months
- May 30, 2009, 6:42 pm
- Nissan Looking At Roadbed Electrification
- October 19, 2009, 11:21 am
- Re: Nissan Looking At Roadbed Electrification
- October 20, 2009, 10:52 pm
- Re: Roadbed Electrification, for people with a clue.
- July 3, 2009, 12:30 am
- Re: Roadbed Electrification, for people with a clue.
- July 7, 2009, 4:32 pm
- Can you get fuel sensors to detect the right kind of fuel for a car?
- June 14, 2006, 4:46 pm
- GBPC5010 & GBPC4010 will be obsolete in 2 months... (50a 1000V bridge rectifiers)
- October 4, 2009, 2:29 pm
- 75% Efficiency From Induction Electrification of Roadbeds
- December 31, 2008, 2:47 pm
> >> On 6/5/09 1:26 PM, in article
> >> o6idnVqzaun2_rTXnZ2dnUVZ_gJi4...@giganews.com,
> >>>> Again you've lost me---you are obviously misinterpreting what I said.
> >>>> Braking is done by the electric motor; for most of the braking period
> >>>> you are recovering the kinetic energy, which is why it is called
> >>>> regenerative braking. The ultimate implementation would have no disc
> >>>> brakes at all. If you need further explanation please let me know.
> >>> Motor/generators are transducers, not brakes. That means you can only
> >>> slow down, not come to a complete stop. If the electronic controller
> >>> failed, you couldn't even slow down. How big a market do you expect
> >>> for
> >>> cars without brakes?
> >> True. Thanks for the affirmation, Bill.
> > But motors can be reversed, and so you can certainly come to a
> > complete stop using only the motors. However, as I said, there can be
> > a simple type of brake, since you need something for parking.
> No they cannot! Not in real world applications! Try it! Try using only
> engine braking. Engine braking has far more stopping potential than an
> electric motor. But it still is far from enough!