Please Register and login to reply and use other advanced options
- Re: Frequency-to-voltage and visa versa at 1.602 =?UTF-8?Q?=C3=97?= 10^-19 volt.
- June 1, 2009, 1:30 pm
- Re: Frequency-to-voltage and visa versa at 1.602 × 10^-19 volt.
- June 1, 2009, 10:27 pm
- Re: Frequency-to-voltage and visa versa at 1.602 × 10^-19 volt.
- June 1, 2009, 10:29 pm
- Amplitude-to-Frequency and Visa Versa
- May 8, 2009, 8:17 pm
- Frequency-to-Amplitude and visa-versa conversion -- possible?
- May 29, 2009, 8:36 pm
- Exact frequency-to-amplitude -- and visa versa -- conversion. Is it possible? Does it exist?
- May 30, 2009, 6:06 pm
- Re: DIY electromagnet under =?iso-8859-1?b?ozEwMDo=?= Disappointing results
- October 10, 2009, 12:03 pm
- How frequency effects voltage
- December 27, 2005, 9:24 am
- Frequency to voltage conversion
- September 15, 2008, 7:55 am
- Measuring low frequency average voltage
- December 9, 2004, 6:31 pm
- PLEASE HELP! Frequency to Voltage Converter LM2917N 14-pin
- April 6, 2006, 5:45 am
- frequency and voltage drop across inductors
- May 6, 2007, 9:26 pm
- Using Frequency to voltage converter. LM2907
- August 22, 2007, 5:23 pm
- Shutting out mains voltage frequency 50/60Hz
- March 7, 2006, 8:50 am
> GreenXenon wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > If 1.602 × 10^-19 volt is too small, then what is the smallest
> > physically-possible voltage that can be detected or processed given
> > the state of today's technology?
>
> First learn the difference between an electron-volt and a volt. Then
> explain why your question happens to assume a voltage that is
> numerically equal to the charge on an electron. An answer to your
> question will make more sense to you if you can do that. Asi it is,
> you're just using words that you don't understand to imply assertions
> that aren't valid.
>
> Jerry
> --
> Engineering is the art of making what you want from things you can get.
> ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ