Please Register and login to reply and use other advanced options
warmer than 70 F.
Babbling, trolling idiot.
--
Jim Pennino
Remove .spam.sux to reply.
Easy. If the background temperature is 70 F, then 0 Watts.
Charles Perry P.E.
Zero watts.
--
Jim Pennino
Remove .spam.sux to reply.
On Mon, 01 Jun 2009 20:45:02 GMT, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
Well, not quite. Zero watts won't _raise_ the temperature at all. ;-)
Well, not quite. Zero watts won't _raise_ the temperature at all. ;-)
Correct, and it is the only power level guaranteed not to exceed 70 F
based on the conditions of the question, and there aren't any.
--
Jim Pennino
Remove .spam.sux to reply.
- Re: Frequency-to-voltage and visa versa at 1.602 × 10^-19 volt.
- June 1, 2009, 10:27 pm
- Re: Frequency-to-voltage and visa versa at 1.602 × 10^-19 volt.
- June 1, 2009, 10:29 pm
- Amplitude-to-Frequency and Visa Versa
- May 8, 2009, 8:17 pm
- Frequency-to-Amplitude and visa-versa conversion -- possible?
- May 29, 2009, 8:36 pm
- Re: Frequency-to-voltage and visa versaat 1.602 =?iso-8859-1?Q?=D7?= 10^-19 volt.
- June 1, 2009, 10:49 am
- Exact frequency-to-amplitude -- and visa versa -- conversion. Is it possible? Does it exist?
- May 30, 2009, 6:06 pm
- How frequency effects voltage
- December 27, 2005, 9:24 am
- Frequency to voltage conversion
- September 15, 2008, 7:55 am
- Measuring low frequency average voltage
- December 9, 2004, 6:31 pm
- PLEASE HELP! Frequency to Voltage Converter LM2917N 14-pin
- April 6, 2006, 5:45 am
- frequency and voltage drop across inductors
- May 6, 2007, 9:26 pm
- Using Frequency to voltage converter. LM2907
- August 22, 2007, 5:23 pm
- Shutting out mains voltage frequency 50/60Hz
- March 7, 2006, 8:50 am
- Need a sample & hold, low frequency to voltage circuit, no output drift.
- August 27, 2008, 3:51 pm
- Puzzling circuit in EDN design ideas (NE555 voltage to frequency converter)
- March 2, 2008, 4:31 pm
>
>> First learn the difference between an electron-volt and a volt. Then
>> explain why your question happens to assume a voltage that is
>> numerically equal to the charge on an electron. An answer to your
>> question will make more sense to you if you can do that. Asi it is,
>> you're just using words that you don't understand to imply assertions
>> that aren't valid.
>
>
> Ok. What is the smallest physically-possible voltage that can be
> detected or processed given
> the state of today's technology?
>
> The maximum voltage I prefer is 0.56 because that is the max one can
> get *without*:
>
> 1. Exceeding the dielectric strength of any electronic component
>
> 2. Generating temperatures above 70 Fahrenheit in any electronic
> component