Bookmark this page: Feed Icon Feed Icon Feed Icon Feed Icon Feed Icon Feed Icon
  •  
  • Subject
  • Author
  • Date
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Posted by jimp on June 1, 2009, 1:30 pm
>
>
>> First learn the difference between an electron-volt and a volt. Then
>> explain why your question happens to assume a voltage that is
>> numerically equal to the charge on an electron. An answer to your
>> question will make more sense to you if you can do that. Asi it is,
>> you're just using words that you don't understand to imply assertions
>> that aren't valid.
>
>
> Ok. What is the smallest physically-possible voltage that can be
> detected or processed given
> the state of today's technology?
>
> The maximum voltage I prefer is 0.56 because that is the max one can
> get *without*:
>
> 1. Exceeding the dielectric strength of any electronic component
>
> 2. Generating temperatures above 70 Fahrenheit in any electronic
> component

0.56 volts at 1000 amp equals 560 watts, which will get most anything
warmer than 70 F.

Babbling, trolling idiot.

--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

Posted by Charles Perry on June 1, 2009, 4:24 pm

> On Jun 1, 10:30 am, j...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> 0.56 volts at 1000 amp equals 560 watts, which will get most anything
>> warmer than 70 F.
> What is the highest-wattage that won't raise the temperature of
> anything beyond 70 Fahrenheit?

Easy. If the background temperature is 70 F, then 0 Watts.

Charles Perry P.E.



Posted by jimp on June 1, 2009, 4:45 pm
> On Jun 1, 10:30 am, j...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>
>
>> 0.56 volts at 1000 amp equals 560 watts, which will get most anything
>> warmer than 70 F.
>
>
> What is the highest-wattage that won't raise the temperature of
> anything beyond 70 Fahrenheit?

Zero watts.


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

Posted by krw on June 1, 2009, 7:48 pm
On Mon, 01 Jun 2009 20:45:02 GMT, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:

>> On Jun 1, 10:30 am, j...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>
>>
>>> 0.56 volts at 1000 amp equals 560 watts, which will get most anything
>>> warmer than 70 F.
>>
>>
>> What is the highest-wattage that won't raise the temperature of
>> anything beyond 70 Fahrenheit?
>Zero watts.

Well, not quite. Zero watts won't _raise_ the temperature at all. ;-)

Posted by jimp on June 1, 2009, 8:30 pm
> On Mon, 01 Jun 2009 20:45:02 GMT, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>
>>> On Jun 1, 10:30 am, j...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> 0.56 volts at 1000 amp equals 560 watts, which will get most anything
>>>> warmer than 70 F.
>>>
>>>
>>> What is the highest-wattage that won't raise the temperature of
>>> anything beyond 70 Fahrenheit?
>>Zero watts.
>
> Well, not quite. Zero watts won't _raise_ the temperature at all. ;-)

Correct, and it is the only power level guaranteed not to exceed 70 F
based on the conditions of the question, and there aren't any.


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

  • Subject
  • Date