Posted by jimp on June 1, 2009, 1:30 pm
>
>
>> First learn the difference between an electron-volt and a volt. Then
>> explain why your question happens to assume a voltage that is
>> numerically equal to the charge on an electron. An answer to your
>> question will make more sense to you if you can do that. Asi it is,
>> you're just using words that you don't understand to imply assertions
>> that aren't valid.
>
>
> Ok. What is the smallest physically-possible voltage that can be
> detected or processed given
> the state of today's technology?
>
> The maximum voltage I prefer is 0.56 because that is the max one can
> get *without*:
>
> 1. Exceeding the dielectric strength of any electronic component
>
> 2. Generating temperatures above 70 Fahrenheit in any electronic
> component
0.56 volts at 1000 amp equals 560 watts, which will get most anything
warmer than 70 F.
Babbling, trolling idiot.
--
Jim Pennino
Remove .spam.sux to reply.
Posted by Charles Perry on June 1, 2009, 4:24 pm
> On Jun 1, 10:30 am, j...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> 0.56 volts at 1000 amp equals 560 watts, which will get most anything
>> warmer than 70 F.
> What is the highest-wattage that won't raise the temperature of
> anything beyond 70 Fahrenheit?
Easy. If the background temperature is 70 F, then 0 Watts.
Charles Perry P.E.
Posted by jimp on June 1, 2009, 4:45 pm
> On Jun 1, 10:30 am, j...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>
>
>> 0.56 volts at 1000 amp equals 560 watts, which will get most anything
>> warmer than 70 F.
>
>
> What is the highest-wattage that won't raise the temperature of
> anything beyond 70 Fahrenheit?
Zero watts.
--
Jim Pennino
Remove .spam.sux to reply.
Posted by krw on June 1, 2009, 7:48 pm
On Mon, 01 Jun 2009 20:45:02 GMT, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> On Jun 1, 10:30 am, j...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>
>>
>>> 0.56 volts at 1000 amp equals 560 watts, which will get most anything
>>> warmer than 70 F.
>>
>>
>> What is the highest-wattage that won't raise the temperature of
>> anything beyond 70 Fahrenheit?
>Zero watts.
Well, not quite. Zero watts won't _raise_ the temperature at all. ;-)
Posted by jimp on June 1, 2009, 8:30 pm
> On Mon, 01 Jun 2009 20:45:02 GMT, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>
>>> On Jun 1, 10:30 am, j...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> 0.56 volts at 1000 amp equals 560 watts, which will get most anything
>>>> warmer than 70 F.
>>>
>>>
>>> What is the highest-wattage that won't raise the temperature of
>>> anything beyond 70 Fahrenheit?
>>
>>Zero watts.
>
> Well, not quite. Zero watts won't _raise_ the temperature at all. ;-)
Correct, and it is the only power level guaranteed not to exceed 70 F
based on the conditions of the question, and there aren't any.
--
Jim Pennino
Remove .spam.sux to reply.
>
>> First learn the difference between an electron-volt and a volt. Then
>> explain why your question happens to assume a voltage that is
>> numerically equal to the charge on an electron. An answer to your
>> question will make more sense to you if you can do that. Asi it is,
>> you're just using words that you don't understand to imply assertions
>> that aren't valid.
>
>
> Ok. What is the smallest physically-possible voltage that can be
> detected or processed given
> the state of today's technology?
>
> The maximum voltage I prefer is 0.56 because that is the max one can
> get *without*:
>
> 1. Exceeding the dielectric strength of any electronic component
>
> 2. Generating temperatures above 70 Fahrenheit in any electronic
> component