If you were Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Hi:
Please don=92t get upset at me.
I apologize profusely for posting something similar in a different
thread. However, you will notice some difference as you read.
Does a device that switches frequency [in number of Hz] with peak-to-
peak amplitude [in watts-per-meter] equivalent to the Hz number of 1-
Hz-photon(s)-per-second-per-meter =96 and visa versa -- exist? If not,
is it possible to construct one?
In this device, the input of a signal that has a frequency of X Hz and
a peak-to-peak amplitude of watts-per-meter equivalent to Y number of
1-Hz-photon[s]-per-second-per-meter will result in the output of a
signal that has a frequency of Y Hz and a peak-to-peak amplitude of
watts-per-meter equivalent to X number of 1-Hz-photon[s]-per-second-
per-meter.
NOTE: The electronic signal=92s amplitude itself is never measured in
photon[s]-per-second-per-meter. It is measured in watts-per-meter.
It=92s just that the watts-per-meter is made equivalent to that of the
given number of 1-Hz-photon[s]-per-second-per-meter. An electronic
signal is made of electrons, not photons.
Given a constant wavelength/frequency of a signal of EM radiation [1
Hz in this case], a greater number of photon[s]-per-second-per-meter
is equivalent to more watts-per-meter.
However, it=92s important to remember that the quantum unit of an
electronic signal is the electron, not the photon.
Thanks
Then stop posting stupid shit.
[snip rest, unread]
Maybe you should use Webers per feet instead, this unit includes the
ratio of the proton mass to the electron mass.
Hi:
Please don’t get upset at me.
I apologize profusely for posting something similar in a different
thread. However, you will notice some difference as you read.
Does a device that switches frequency [in number of Hz] with peak-to-
peak amplitude [in watts-per-meter] equivalent to the Hz number of 1-
Hz-photon(s)-per-second-per-meter – and visa versa -- exist?
If not,
is it possible to construct one?
In this device, the input of a signal that has a frequency of X Hz and
a peak-to-peak amplitude of watts-per-meter equivalent to Y number of
Thanks
In article
I am not upset with you--just bored with you. I did not read your entire
post.
I do not think that you worded your question well,
The typical automobile tachometer/dwell meter reads out a voltage
proportional to the rotary speed of the engine,
There also are voltage controlled oscilators that benerate frequencies
porportional to a voltage.
Have fun.
Bill
--
Most people go to college to get their missing high school education.
Please don=92t get upset at me.
I apologize profusely for posting something similar in a different
thread. However, you will notice some difference as you read.
Does a device that switches frequency [in number of Hz] with peak-to-
peak amplitude [in watts-per-meter] equivalent to the Hz number of 1-
Hz-photon(s)-per-second-per-meter =96 and visa versa -- exist? If not,
is it possible to construct one?
In this device, the input of a signal that has a frequency of X Hz and
a peak-to-peak amplitude of watts-per-meter equivalent to Y number of
1-Hz-photon[s]-per-second-per-meter will result in the output of a
signal that has a frequency of Y Hz and a peak-to-peak amplitude of
watts-per-meter equivalent to X number of 1-Hz-photon[s]-per-second-
per-meter.
NOTE: The electronic signal=92s amplitude itself is never measured in
photon[s]-per-second-per-meter. It is measured in watts-per-meter.
It=92s just that the watts-per-meter is made equivalent to that of the
given number of 1-Hz-photon[s]-per-second-per-meter. An electronic
signal is made of electrons, not photons.
Given a constant wavelength/frequency of a signal of EM radiation [1
Hz in this case], a greater number of photon[s]-per-second-per-meter
is equivalent to more watts-per-meter.
However, it=92s important to remember that the quantum unit of an
electronic signal is the electron, not the photon.
Thanks
Then stop posting stupid shit.
[snip rest, unread]
> Hi:
> Please don=92t get upset at me.
> I apologize profusely for posting something similar in a different
> thread. However, you will notice some difference as you read.
> Does a device that switches frequency [in number of Hz] with peak-to-
> peak amplitude [in watts-per-meter] equivalent to the Hz number of 1-
> Hz-photon(s)-per-second-per-meter =96 and visa versa -- exist? If not,
> is it possible to construct one?
> In this device, the input of a signal that has a frequency of X Hz and
> a peak-to-peak amplitude of watts-per-meter equivalent to Y number of
> 1-Hz-photon[s]-per-second-per-meter will result in the output of a
> signal that has a frequency of Y Hz and a peak-to-peak amplitude of
> watts-per-meter equivalent to X number of 1-Hz-photon[s]-per-second-
> per-meter.
> NOTE: The electronic signal=92s amplitude itself is never measured in
> photon[s]-per-second-per-meter. It is measured in watts-per-meter.
> It=92s just that the watts-per-meter is made equivalent to that of the
> given number of 1-Hz-photon[s]-per-second-per-meter. An electronic
> signal is made of electrons, not photons.
> Given a constant wavelength/frequency of a signal of EM radiation [1
> Hz in this case], a greater number of photon[s]-per-second-per-meter
> is equivalent to more watts-per-meter.
> However, it=92s important to remember that the quantum unit of an
> electronic signal is the electron, not the photon.
> Thanks
> Please don=92t get upset at me.
> I apologize profusely for posting something similar in a different
> thread. However, you will notice some difference as you read.
> Does a device that switches frequency [in number of Hz] with peak-to-
> peak amplitude [in watts-per-meter] equivalent to the Hz number of 1-
> Hz-photon(s)-per-second-per-meter =96 and visa versa -- exist? If not,
> is it possible to construct one?
> In this device, the input of a signal that has a frequency of X Hz and
> a peak-to-peak amplitude of watts-per-meter equivalent to Y number of
> 1-Hz-photon[s]-per-second-per-meter will result in the output of a
> signal that has a frequency of Y Hz and a peak-to-peak amplitude of
> watts-per-meter equivalent to X number of 1-Hz-photon[s]-per-second-
> per-meter.
> NOTE: The electronic signal=92s amplitude itself is never measured in
> photon[s]-per-second-per-meter. It is measured in watts-per-meter.
> It=92s just that the watts-per-meter is made equivalent to that of the
> given number of 1-Hz-photon[s]-per-second-per-meter. An electronic
> signal is made of electrons, not photons.
> Given a constant wavelength/frequency of a signal of EM radiation [1
> Hz in this case], a greater number of photon[s]-per-second-per-meter
> is equivalent to more watts-per-meter.
> However, it=92s important to remember that the quantum unit of an
> electronic signal is the electron, not the photon.
> Thanks
Maybe you should use Webers per feet instead, this unit includes the
ratio of the proton mass to the electron mass.
Hi:
Please don’t get upset at me.
I apologize profusely for posting something similar in a different
thread. However, you will notice some difference as you read.
Does a device that switches frequency [in number of Hz] with peak-to-
peak amplitude [in watts-per-meter] equivalent to the Hz number of 1-
Hz-photon(s)-per-second-per-meter – and visa versa -- exist?
>>>>>> NO.
If not,
is it possible to construct one?
>>>>> NO. your units are wrong, they dont match up.
In this device, the input of a signal that has a frequency of X Hz and
a peak-to-peak amplitude of watts-per-meter equivalent to Y number of
>>>>> Hz is 1/t, amplitude is in volts, watts/meter is ?? watts per square
>>>>> meter ???.
>>>>> meter ???.
Thanks
In article
> Please donąt get upset at me.
I am not upset with you--just bored with you. I did not read your entire
post.
I do not think that you worded your question well,
The typical automobile tachometer/dwell meter reads out a voltage
proportional to the rotary speed of the engine,
There also are voltage controlled oscilators that benerate frequencies
porportional to a voltage.
Have fun.
Bill
--
Most people go to college to get their missing high school education.
- Conversion
- August 31, 2006, 11:36 am
- TTL / RS-232 conversion circuit
- July 1, 2005, 8:54 pm
- What is conversion factor?
- December 13, 2005, 8:15 am
- IC Pitch conversion?
- May 13, 2006, 10:56 pm
- Component Conversion
- September 20, 2006, 1:55 am
- Audio Up/Down Conversion
- June 8, 2007, 8:15 am
- LED Lumens to Lux conversion?
- November 14, 2007, 7:50 pm
- Voltage conversion
- April 30, 2009, 9:32 pm
- A/D conversion by PC sound card?
- October 14, 2004, 2:26 am
- mobil phone conversion
- December 5, 2005, 10:28 am
- Re: 4-20ma to 0-10 volt conversion
- March 20, 2007, 9:25 pm
- Re: 4-20ma to 0-10 volt conversion
- March 21, 2007, 5:39 am
- Re: 4-20ma to 0-10 volt conversion
- March 21, 2007, 7:35 am
- Video Format Conversion?
- May 19, 2007, 1:03 pm
- Frequency to voltage conversion
- September 15, 2008, 7:55 am








> Please don=92t get upset at me.