Page 1 of 3   1 2 3 > last >>
Bookmark this page: Feed Icon Feed Icon Feed Icon Feed Icon Feed Icon Feed Icon
  •  
  • Subject
  • Author
  • Date
If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Posted by GreenXenon on May 29, 2009, 8:36 pm
Hi:

Please don=92t get upset at me.

I apologize profusely for posting something similar in a different
thread. However, you will notice some difference as you read.

Does a device that switches frequency [in number of Hz] with peak-to-
peak amplitude [in watts-per-meter] equivalent to the Hz number of 1-
Hz-photon(s)-per-second-per-meter =96 and visa versa -- exist? If not,
is it possible to construct one?

In this device, the input of a signal that has a frequency of X Hz and
a peak-to-peak amplitude of watts-per-meter equivalent to Y number of
1-Hz-photon[s]-per-second-per-meter will result in the output of a
signal that has a frequency of Y Hz and a peak-to-peak amplitude of
watts-per-meter equivalent to X number of 1-Hz-photon[s]-per-second-
per-meter.

NOTE: The electronic signal=92s amplitude itself is never measured in
photon[s]-per-second-per-meter. It is measured in watts-per-meter.
It=92s just that the watts-per-meter is made equivalent to that of the
given number of 1-Hz-photon[s]-per-second-per-meter. An electronic
signal is made of electrons, not photons.

Given a constant wavelength/frequency of a signal of EM radiation [1
Hz in this case], a greater number of photon[s]-per-second-per-meter
is equivalent to more watts-per-meter.

However, it=92s important to remember that the quantum unit of an
electronic signal is the electron, not the photon.


Thanks

Posted by Eric Gisse on May 29, 2009, 10:29 pm
> Hi:
> Please don=92t get upset at me.

Then stop posting stupid shit.

[snip rest, unread]

Posted by a7yvm109gf5d1 on May 29, 2009, 11:37 pm
> Hi:
> Please don=92t get upset at me.
> I apologize profusely for posting something similar in a different
> thread. However, you will notice some difference as you read.
> Does a device that switches frequency [in number of Hz] with peak-to-
> peak amplitude [in watts-per-meter] equivalent to the Hz number of 1-
> Hz-photon(s)-per-second-per-meter =96 and visa versa -- exist? If not,
> is it possible to construct one?
> In this device, the input of a signal that has a frequency of X Hz and
> a peak-to-peak amplitude of watts-per-meter equivalent to Y number of
> 1-Hz-photon[s]-per-second-per-meter will result in the output of a
> signal that has a frequency of Y Hz and a peak-to-peak amplitude of
> watts-per-meter equivalent to X number of 1-Hz-photon[s]-per-second-
> per-meter.
> NOTE: The electronic signal=92s amplitude itself is never measured in
> photon[s]-per-second-per-meter. It is measured in watts-per-meter.
> It=92s just that the watts-per-meter is made equivalent to that of the
> given number of 1-Hz-photon[s]-per-second-per-meter. An electronic
> signal is made of electrons, not photons.
> Given a constant wavelength/frequency of a signal of EM radiation [1
> Hz in this case], a greater number of photon[s]-per-second-per-meter
> is equivalent to more watts-per-meter.
> However, it=92s important to remember that the quantum unit of an
> electronic signal is the electron, not the photon.
> Thanks

Maybe you should use Webers per feet instead, this unit includes the
ratio of the proton mass to the electron mass.


Posted by chum ley on May 30, 2009, 1:12 am

Hi:

Please don’t get upset at me.

I apologize profusely for posting something similar in a different
thread. However, you will notice some difference as you read.

Does a device that switches frequency [in number of Hz] with peak-to-
peak amplitude [in watts-per-meter] equivalent to the Hz number of 1-
Hz-photon(s)-per-second-per-meter – and visa versa -- exist?

>>>>>> NO.

If not,
is it possible to construct one?

>>>>> NO. your units are wrong, they dont match up.


In this device, the input of a signal that has a frequency of X Hz and
a peak-to-peak amplitude of watts-per-meter equivalent to Y number of

>>>>> Hz is 1/t, amplitude is in volts, watts/meter is ?? watts per square
>>>>> meter ???.



Thanks



Posted by Salmon Egg on May 30, 2009, 2:09 am
In article

> Please donąt get upset at me.

I am not upset with you--just bored with you. I did not read your entire
post.

I do not think that you worded your question well,

The typical automobile tachometer/dwell meter reads out a voltage
proportional to the rotary speed of the engine,

There also are voltage controlled oscilators that benerate frequencies
porportional to a voltage.

Have fun.

Bill

--
Most people go to college to get their missing high school education.

Page 1 of 3   1 2 3 > last >>
  • Subject
  • Date