
- Exact frequency-to-amplitude -- and visa versa -- conversion. Is it possible? Does it exist?
- 05-30-2009
![]() ![]() ![]() Re: Exact frequency-to-amplitude... Holy Shit! It'...
| Michael A. Terr... | 05-31-2009 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Re: Exact frequency-to-amplitude... Holy Shit! It'...
| TheQuickBrownFo... | 06-02-2009 |
![]() Re: Exact frequency-to-amplitude -- and visa versa...
| Paul Hovnanian ... | 06-04-2009 |
Please Register and login to reply and use other advanced options
Hi:
Please don=92t get upset at me.
I apologize profusely for posting something similar in a different
thread. However, you will notice some difference as you read.
I=92m thinking of a theoretical device that switches frequency with peak-
to-peak amplitude and visa versa in the following manner.
An electron volt is 1.602 =D7 10^-19 joules. Let=92s say the amplitude is
measures in volts.
One electron has a charge of 1.602 =D7 10^-19 coulomb.
In my hypothetical device the input of a signal that has a frequency
of A Hz and a peak-to-peak amplitude of B volts will result in the
output of a signal that has a frequency of B Hz and a peak-to-peak
amplitude of A x [1.602 =D7 10^-19 volts].
In this device, a higher peak-to-peak input voltage [whether or not it
goes below the x-axis of a graph] will result in a higher output
frequency.
A higher input voltage itself will not necessarily result in a higher
output frequency than a lower input voltage. However, a higher peak-to-
peak input voltage will result in a higher output frequency than a
lower input peak-to-peak voltage.
Is such a device possible? If so, does it exist?
There are several applications I can think of for this device:
1. Transmitting/recording too high a frequency signal on a medium that
does not have the bandwidth required to handle the high-frequency
2. Transmitting/recording too large and amplitude signal on a medium
that does not have the dynamic range required to handle the large
amplitude
3. Generating a higher-frequency signal from a bunch of lower-
frequency signals
Thanks
Please don=92t get upset at me.
I apologize profusely for posting something similar in a different
thread. However, you will notice some difference as you read.
I=92m thinking of a theoretical device that switches frequency with peak-
to-peak amplitude and visa versa in the following manner.
An electron volt is 1.602 =D7 10^-19 joules. Let=92s say the amplitude is
measures in volts.
One electron has a charge of 1.602 =D7 10^-19 coulomb.
In my hypothetical device the input of a signal that has a frequency
of A Hz and a peak-to-peak amplitude of B volts will result in the
output of a signal that has a frequency of B Hz and a peak-to-peak
amplitude of A x [1.602 =D7 10^-19 volts].
In this device, a higher peak-to-peak input voltage [whether or not it
goes below the x-axis of a graph] will result in a higher output
frequency.
A higher input voltage itself will not necessarily result in a higher
output frequency than a lower input voltage. However, a higher peak-to-
peak input voltage will result in a higher output frequency than a
lower input peak-to-peak voltage.
Is such a device possible? If so, does it exist?
There are several applications I can think of for this device:
1. Transmitting/recording too high a frequency signal on a medium that
does not have the bandwidth required to handle the high-frequency
2. Transmitting/recording too large and amplitude signal on a medium
that does not have the dynamic range required to handle the large
amplitude
3. Generating a higher-frequency signal from a bunch of lower-
frequency signals
Thanks
*plonk*
Do not reply to this generic message, it was automatically generated;
you have been kill-filed, either for being boringly stupid, repetitive,
unfunny, ineducable, repeatedly posting politics, religion or off-topic
subjects to a sci. newsgroup, attempting cheapskate free advertising
for profit, because you are a troll, simply insane or any combination
or permutation of the aforementioned reasons; any reply will go unread.
Boringly stupid is the most common cause of kill-filing, but because
this message is generic the other reasons have been included. You are
left to decide which is most applicable to you.
There is no appeal, I have despotic power over whom I will electronically
admit into my home and you do not qualify as a reasonable person I would
wish to converse with or even poke fun at. Some weirdoes are not kill-
filed, they amuse me and I retain them for their entertainment value
as I would any chicken with two heads, either one of which enables the
dumb bird to scratch dirt, step back, look down, step forward to the
same spot and repeat the process eternally.
This should not trouble you, many of those plonked find it a blessing
that they are not required to think and can persist in their bigotry
or crackpot theories without challenge.
You have the right to free speech, I have the right not to listen. The
kill-file will be cleared annually with spring cleaning or whenever I
purchase a new computer or hard drive.
I hope you find this explanation is satisfactory but even if you don't,
damnly my frank, I don't give a dear. Have a nice day.
Hi:
Please don’t get upset at me.
I apologize profusely for posting something similar in a different
thread. However, you will notice some difference as you read.
I’m thinking of a theoretical device that switches frequency with peak-
to-peak amplitude and visa versa in the following manner.
An electron volt is 1.602 × 10^-19 joules. Let’s say the amplitude is
measures in volts.
One electron has a charge of 1.602 × 10^-19 coulomb.
In my hypothetical device the input of a signal that has a frequency
of A Hz and a peak-to-peak amplitude of B volts will result in the
output of a signal that has a frequency of B Hz and a peak-to-peak
amplitude of A x [1.602 × 10^-19 volts].
In this device, a higher peak-to-peak input voltage [whether or not it
goes below the x-axis of a graph] will result in a higher output
frequency.
A higher input voltage itself will not necessarily result in a higher
output frequency than a lower input voltage. However, a higher peak-to-
peak input voltage will result in a higher output frequency than a
lower input peak-to-peak voltage.
Is such a device possible? If so, does it exist?
There are several applications I can think of for this device:
1. Transmitting/recording too high a frequency signal on a medium that
does not have the bandwidth required to handle the high-frequency
2. Transmitting/recording too large and amplitude signal on a medium
that does not have the dynamic range required to handle the large
amplitude
3. Generating a higher-frequency signal from a bunch of lower-
frequency signals
Thanks
Do not reply to this generic message, it was automatically generated;
you have been kill-filed, either for being boringly stupid, repetitive,
unfunny, ineducable, repeatedly posting politics, religion or off-topic
subjects to a sci. newsgroup, attempting cheapskate free advertising
for profit, because you are a troll, simply insane or any combination
or permutation of the aforementioned reasons; any reply will go unread.
Boringly stupid is the most common cause of kill-filing, but because
this message is generic the other reasons have been included. You are
left to decide which is most applicable to you.
There is no appeal, I have despotic power over whom I will electronically
admit into my home and you do not qualify as a reasonable person I would
wish to converse with or even poke fun at. Some weirdoes are not kill-
filed, they amuse me and I retain them for their entertainment value
as I would any chicken with two heads, either one of which enables the
dumb bird to scratch dirt, step back, look down, step forward to the
same spot and repeat the process eternally.
This should not trouble you, many of those plonked find it a blessing
that they are not required to think and can persist in their bigotry
or crackpot theories without challenge.
You have the right to free speech, I have the right not to listen. The
kill-file will be cleared annually with spring cleaning or whenever I
purchase a new computer or hard drive.
I hope you find this explanation is satisfactory but even if you don't,
damnly my frank, I don't give a dear. Have a nice day.
Hi:
Please don’t get upset at me.
I apologize profusely for posting something similar in a different
thread. However, you will notice some difference as you read.
I’m thinking of a theoretical device that switches frequency with peak-
to-peak amplitude and visa versa in the following manner.
An electron volt is 1.602 × 10^-19 joules. Let’s say the amplitude is
measures in volts.
One electron has a charge of 1.602 × 10^-19 coulomb.
In my hypothetical device the input of a signal that has a frequency
of A Hz and a peak-to-peak amplitude of B volts will result in the
output of a signal that has a frequency of B Hz and a peak-to-peak
amplitude of A x [1.602 × 10^-19 volts].
In this device, a higher peak-to-peak input voltage [whether or not it
goes below the x-axis of a graph] will result in a higher output
frequency.
A higher input voltage itself will not necessarily result in a higher
output frequency than a lower input voltage. However, a higher peak-to-
peak input voltage will result in a higher output frequency than a
lower input peak-to-peak voltage.
Is such a device possible? If so, does it exist?
There are several applications I can think of for this device:
1. Transmitting/recording too high a frequency signal on a medium that
does not have the bandwidth required to handle the high-frequency
2. Transmitting/recording too large and amplitude signal on a medium
that does not have the dynamic range required to handle the large
amplitude
3. Generating a higher-frequency signal from a bunch of lower-
frequency signals
Thanks
GreenXenon wrote:
[snip crap]
1) Einstein, Albert. "Über einen die Erzeugung und Verwandlung des
Lichtes betreffenden heuristischen Gesichtspunkt," Annalen der Physik
17 132 (1905).
2) idiot
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2
[snip crap]
1) Einstein, Albert. "Über einen die Erzeugung und Verwandlung des
Lichtes betreffenden heuristischen Gesichtspunkt," Annalen der Physik
17 132 (1905).
2) idiot
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2
Potter all appearing in the same thread!!!!
Holy Shit! It's harmonic convergence I tell you! I'm going to meet
the others in the rural field to await the coming end of the world...
Oh wait! I forgot. Benj is here too! Now I KNOW it's the END!!!!!!!!
- Frequency-to-Amplitude and visa-versa conversion -- possible?
- May 29, 2009, 8:36 pm
- Amplitude-to-Frequency and Visa Versa
- May 8, 2009, 8:17 pm
- Re: Frequency-to-voltage and visa versa at 1.602 =?UTF-8?Q?=C3=97?= 10^-19 volt.
- June 1, 2009, 1:30 pm
- Re: Frequency-to-voltage and visa versa at 1.602 × 10^-19 volt.
- June 1, 2009, 10:27 pm
- Re: Frequency-to-voltage and visa versa at 1.602 × 10^-19 volt.
- June 1, 2009, 10:29 pm
- Re: Frequency-to-voltage and visa versaat 1.602 =?iso-8859-1?Q?=D7?= 10^-19 volt.
- June 1, 2009, 10:49 am
- Frequency to voltage conversion
- September 15, 2008, 7:55 am
- Conversion programm + Frequency counter
- February 25, 2005, 10:12 am
- Conversion programm + frequency counter
- February 25, 2005, 11:03 pm
- Counter not decrementing to exact value to 0x00000
- April 25, 2009, 1:13 am
- exact current and potential source
- April 23, 2010, 1:51 pm
- Does this pot exist?
- May 10, 2005, 9:20 pm
- Did a BT135 SCR exist?
- November 11, 2009, 3:05 pm
- Low on-resistance bipolar transistor - does it exist?
- April 6, 2007, 2:03 pm
- do 16-input nand gates exist?
- March 28, 2009, 7:24 pm






> > >GreenXenon wrote:
> > > [snip crap]