1N5819s? Or just a couple of 1N4001s?

- D
- Dave
  
  Contact options for registered users
posted
10 years ago

Sun, Sep 22, 2013 3:01 PM

I have been wanting to make use of a pair of 1N5819s to protect an RF amplifier I am building from static discharge, should someone touch the antenna, but haven't been able to obtain any of these just yet. I DO have some 1N4001s however, and am honestly wondering what advantages the 1N5819s would have over the the more readily available 1N4001s (which are already sitting on my workbench.) I have used 1N5819s in the past, and suspect I have forgotten something, I just can't remember what. What is it that I am missing here? I believe I know what I ought to use, I just can't remember why. Somebody, please, enlighten me, and refresh my failing memory. What characteristic is it that the 1N5819 has that the 1N4001 so obviously lacks? I've looked at the datasheets, but it escapes me. Many thanks for any advice, observations or measningful input. I will probably wait for the

1n5819s, I would just like to remember why...

Dave

- F
- Fred Abse
  
  Contact options for registered users
Vote on answer
posted
10 years ago

Sun, Sep 22, 2013 3:33 PM

1N5819 is Schottky, 1N4001 is a junction diode. Chalk and cheese.

60 seconds with Google would tell you that.

--
"Design is the reverse of analysis" 
                   (R.D. Middlebrook)

- P
- Phil Hobbs
  
  Contact options for registered users
Vote on answer
posted
10 years ago

Sun, Sep 22, 2013 7:54 PM

How about a nice transformer output?

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

--
Dr Philip C D Hobbs 
Principal Consultant 
ElectroOptical Innovations LLC 
Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics 

160 North State Road #203 
Briarcliff Manor NY 10510 USA 
+1 845 480 2058 

hobbs at electrooptical dot net 
http://electrooptical.net

- I
- Ian Field
  
  Contact options for registered users
Vote on answer
posted
10 years ago

Sun, Sep 22, 2013 9:51 PM

Shottky barrier diodes tend to have higher junction capacitance.

Trr is very fast - but for this application you don't want them conducting if you can help it.

If you are using an inverse-parallel pair - you don't need the higher voltage 5819, the lower voltage 5817 is more than enough.

Unless something else clamps reverse voltage - shottky diodes themselves can be vulnerable to ESD.

Shottky diodes have about 1/3 the Vf of regular silicon diodes.

- D
- Dave
  
  Contact options for registered users
Vote on answer
posted
10 years ago

Mon, Sep 23, 2013 7:30 PM

Hello Ian, and thanks for all the input. Realizing I was half awake when I made my first posting, and that it left a great deal to be desired, I have posted the schematic and notes I am using to ABSE under the subject "RF Amp for rabbitears" in hopes that it might help. Do you think that 1N5817s would actually be a better choice for the job of the 1N5819s I have in the schematic? I would hate it if they weren't sturdy enough to stand up to someone walking across the carpet and touching the rabbit eats antenna. Sorry I am just getting back to this. but the wife ran my butt off all weekend. Thanks again for any further input.

Dave