ote:
of relief.
change-global-warming/
of species extinction, and probably couldn't even generate a population cr ash.
ions reduction...
n't impressive against the European population of 500 million, and in pract ice these deaths were concentrated amongst the elderly and physically infir m.
to talk about the beginning of a die off, but so far you are being prematur ely alarmist - peddling an apocalyptic fairytale, with even less evidential support that even Jamie thinks he has mustered.
n isolation?
lobal warming proceeds, but they are - in fact - isolated and tolerably imp robable.
om the living with a reproduction rate significantly less than required to maintain its existence. The Muslims have been making up the difference howe ver. Europe will be radically different from what it was by mid-century.
Larkin. The Muslim population of Europe is a small minority, and it would t ake a couple of centuries of energetic breeding to make them a substantial majority, by which time they will be indistiguishable from the rest of the population. I posted the numbers here a few years ago, in response to rough ly the same moronic claim.
g with it since antiquity.
Europe is crowded enough that fertility is currently below replacement, in part because most of it's inhabitants have now got enough money to look for more space for the kids they do have.
e decline. The Muslims will not remain a small minority with replacement ra tes averaging 4-8x those of the ethnic Euros.
Since you don't understand which facts are basic, you fail to recognise how off-the-wall your argument is.
The first generation Muslim immigrants haven't got used to being able to af ford more space, and the family sizes represent the replacement rate their parents grew up with to cope with a much higher child mortality.
The next generation isn't going to be anything like as fertile, but right-w ing lunatics think that it is being Muslim, rather being from an impoverish ed background, which determines the fertility rate.
Mindless extrapolation.
More detailed studies would reveal that people who are doing well in the mo dern world are replacing themselves and then some.
talks about the Flynn effect and positive selection for other "economically valuable personality traits". You aren't seeing a decline in the populatio n of ethnic Europeans, but rather a vigourous selection for particular usef ul traits. People who don't have these traits might not be replacing themse lves - but do we really need to replace the kind of people who voted for Tr ump?