Tax Refunds are less this year, must be Trumps fault

snipped-for-privacy@notreal.com wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@4ax.com:

You are a real piece of SHIT. You are NOT a Republican.

As K says, always wrong. You actually think the Census Bureau only does the one constitutionally mandated census of the US population and we have an entire bureau with thousands of employees that sits on it's ass for nine years? They perform many other functions, one of which is the YEARLY update on poverty, which they do EVERY YEAR.

No, you're just wrong again.

I don't call people who disagree with me libs, unless they are, well, libs. I have no idea where you fit on the political spectrum, but we do know where you are on the intelligence spectrum and correctness. Always wrong.

But rabid right-wingers see the 99% of the population who are less right-wing than they are as a homogeneous mass of liberals.

There is political gradient up from the extreme right up to middle of the road after which it goes downhill a bit to the extreme left.

There's also another more or less orthogonal gradient from totalitarian (communist/fascist) to democratic (socialist/libertarian) that no American seems to understand.

Largely because you don't know much about politics.

An opinion you share with krw, which isn't exactly exulted company.

Totally irrelevant, of course. And just like leftie loons view anything to the right of them as a similar mass of conservative wingnuts.

Thank you again, Captain Obvious.

There you go again, making wild leaps that are totally unsupported by what I've said. I was talking about DL, how do you know what I know? I've only watched him in action for a limited amount of time and he's all over the place, but always on the stupid and wrong side. So, IDK where he fits, but if you insist that I guess, I'd say that part is consistent with a lib.

K isn't the point. Are you trying to tell us that you think DL is intelligent? He's always wrong, so much so that maybe we should get him to pick stocks for us to buy. Then we could short them and make a lot of money. I've never seen anyone so consistently wrong on so many things.

But you're _always_ wrong, AlwaysWrong. Today is no exception.

I'm sure that there are lunatic lefties who are just as nuts as lunatic right-wingers. For some reason they don't post here, while we seem to get a lot of lunatic right-wingers.

I am trying to inform an element of the audience which is remarkably slow on the uptake.

It's more supported by what you haven't said. anything that makes much sense, for a start.

Technically he contributes a lot more than krw, which isn't saying much, but at least he seems to think about what other people post which puts him streets ahead.

Or consistent with somebody who thinks that you are half-wit, which is probably the correct formulation.

Definitely more intelligent than krw, and probably brighter than you are.

That's a very silly idea. C.Northcote Parkinson used the joke a few decades ago in one of his books, but the counter example is that a stopped clock is right twice a day.

You come close.

Look in the mirror.

That would be DL and he's hopeless, always wrong.

Typical.

Oh please, you're just too funny.

I see. DL is not only always wrong, but behaves as an uncontrollable, totally vulgar half-wit, but no, the lib says the problem is with me. Thanks for representing for libs.

Excellent, keep representing for the libs.

Thanks for proving my point. The stopped clock is wrong 99.99% of the time. Following the stock example, if you placed bets based on that clock being wrong, you'd win 99.99% of the time! You'd make a pile of money! And you call me the half-wit?

Why do libs have to lie so much?

ote:

te:

ing

ell, > > > > > libs.

right-wing than they are as a homogeneous mass of liberals.

ing

right-wingers. For some reason they don't post here, while we seem to get a lot of lunatic right-wingers.

I know plenty of people who are both more left-wing than I am and not remo tely lunatic. If you are silly enough to think that you can characterise me as a lunatic left-winger, you've merely confirmed your own lunatic status.

Not that it needed an confirmation.

of the road after which it goes downhill a bit to the extreme left.

ow on the uptake.

Not true. You would be closer to the core of the target audience.

rian (communist/fascist) to democratic (socialist/libertarian) that no Amer ican seems to understand.

what

sense, for a start.

But obviously correct.

, but at least he seems to think about what other people post which puts hi m streets ahead.

The problem is that you are much too stupid to appreciate that recycling cl iches isn't evidence of intelligence.

art

probably the correct formulation.

I'm not actually a "liberal". In Australia that denotes a member of the rig ht-wing major party, who are currently running the government. With any luc k they will be voted out on the 18th May.

DL certainly uses vulgarisms, and posts more often than he should. You go l ighter on the vulgarisms. but you do come across a quite bit more half-witt ed than he is.

ng.

telligent?

e.

Not so much the libs as the inhabitants of the real world.

ocks for us to buy.

ades ago in one of his books, but the counter example is that a stopped clo ck is right twice a day.

me.

But who'd be silly enough to take such a bet?

You seem to use "lie" in the same way that krw does, to mean "say something I disagree with". You clearly don't realise how much you get wrong, which is why I call you stupid, but that doesn't make pointing out your defects a ny kind of lie, even if you'd like to think it did.

snipped-for-privacy@optonline.net wrote in news:f036ce04-df96-4c2d-8cd3- snipped-for-privacy@googlegroups.com:

You are an idiot. You 'haven't heard' because you are oblivious to reality. Obviously so.

snipped-for-privacy@optonline.net wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@googlegroups.com:

Bullshit. I never read or followed them. You are an abject idiot, grasping at straws.

Donald J. Trump had a tax debt with the state of New Jersey. It matters not that he handed over the casinos to others. The tax debt was already there, as yet unpaid. You dig, BOY?

And NO tax hearing is going to drop a tax debt to apoint where 10% of the original debt is accepted.

I see, that explains a lot. So, you just hate Trump, but you don't follow the news, you're not interested in the facts.

You are an abject idiot,

That's not true. It was the casino business entities that had an alleged tax debt. Casinos that had gone bankrupt and most of them had changed ownership, with Trump left with maybe a small stock share in some of them at the time the debts were settled.

It

The tax debt goes with the business entity, it's not Trump's personally, capiche?

It wasn't a hearing. It was a negotiated settlement to a law suit.

snipped-for-privacy@optonline.net wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@googlegroups.com:

Joe's were from decades further back, and still exist to this day. Nice try though.

If there were any Trump Xrays, which there are not, he would be a pussy not to produce them, and they would certainly still exist in an upper class household/regime.

All that happened was that Daddy Trump and an NY doctor had a conversation about what conditions were exclusionary factors in an AFEES exam. 'bone spur' was chosen. Bad choice, Daddy, because the Donald continued to play sports. The proof is in the pudding. Daddy raised a pussy and he knew it. Donald is the one that asked for a way out, after all. "Dad, people are dying over there."

snipped-for-privacy@optonline.net wrote in news:4b14be05-2344-406a-b65d- snipped-for-privacy@googlegroups.com:

He also had no surgery. Not then, nor now.

Oh, and they did not keep Joltin Joe from joining up and he did not even have academy training OR a draft to motivate him. And they were very much so debilitating for him.

If DT's were not debilitating to the point where it did not interrupt his sports endeavors, it certainly should not have stopped a draft, and with the academy education, he should have been lining up and signing up, not waiting for a draft call. Conclusion: 100% pure PUSSY. Bone spur claim assessment: fabricated.

You were saying, dipshit?

snipped-for-privacy@optonline.net wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@googlegroups.com:

You mentioned ONE news agency, you presumptuous dumbfuck.

I mentioned not reading *their* news. Grow the f*ck up.

snipped-for-privacy@optonline.net wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@googlegroups.com:

There is ALWAYS a hearing.

snipped-for-privacy@gmail.com wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@googlegroups.com:

You're a goddamned idiot. The effects were known for decades prior. It was removed from roofing shingles, tar papers (and automotive insulation panels) back in the early '70s.

And he is now trying to open the shit sacks up again.

That's it, dumbass. Suck up to the environmental spoiler.

You're a goddamned idiot.

snipped-for-privacy@gmail.com wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@googlegroups.com:

Your blatant immaturity is glaringly showing the world just haw bad it is. Damn, boy! You are worse than folks thought.

snipped-for-privacy@gmail.com wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@googlegroups.com:

You really are one stupid f*ck. His company was young. He set the policy, and HE maintained it AFTER being warned about the behavior.

Grow the f*ck up, chump. Trump was the landlord, Trump is responsible all the way down the the criminal level. You dig, f*****ad?

snipped-for-privacy@gmail.com wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@googlegroups.com:

WTF are you mumbling about, boy? I was never in any conversation about anyone other than the TrumpTard and his TrumpTarded minions.

You seem to be sporting a personal problem relating to another politician. Showing some seriously lame signs of misogyny too.