On a sunny day (Thu, 25 May 2017 09:36:51 +0200) it happened o pere o wrote in :
If we need ANY regulations at all, then I think it is about the highest time we impose regulations on China to live up to their specs. And force them to write decent English specs, where they for example have at leat the slightest idea what they talk about. It is in their own interests. Else no choice other than to avoid that country's products, no matter how much cheaper those are than say US or EU made stuff.
--
Dr Philip C D Hobbs
Principal Consultant
ElectroOptical Innovations LLC
Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics
160 North State Road #203
Briarcliff Manor NY 10510
hobbs at electrooptical dot net
http://electrooptical.net
Could be. Things take a long time to settle, the equivalent of some very slow dielectric absorption. If I step up the voltage, the power supply current limits for a while, and when the voltage hits the target, the current tapers off slowly, over hours and probably days.
These things take some getting used to. Temperature changes C, and when you change a charged 10F cap connected to a power supply, things happen. So measuring leakage is complex.
--
John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc
lunatic fringe electronics
The variation in leakage current between units, at the working voltage
How much leakage charge inflicted at above rated voltage is required to do damage to the least leaky cap in the string
What voltage you are using the string at, compared to the sum of the individual voltage ratings
the capacitance matching (assuming you are going to charge and discharge them rather than just letting them sit there)
Put another way, could you not draw the same conclusion if you measured the self-discharge of a single lithium battery cell vs. voltage? Yet people keep putting balancing circuits on them. I'm sure there is a reason.
In these caps, current increases nonlinearly, radically upward, with voltage, so a series pair will tend to equalize. In fact, a series pair that I tried did equalize nicely. And overvoltage makes them leak a lot but doesn't appear to damage them.
It's dangerous to put film caps in series to increase voltage rating. Ditto some polymer aluminums and ceramic caps. Wet aluminums, and this supercap, look to be self-equalizing.
Batteries are different, because the first one that runs out of coulombs can be reverse-biased by the others, and damaged. These supercaps are really unpolarized, so won't be damaged by reverse bias. And they are real capacitors, so have a linear discharge curve, not flat-topped like batteries; that makes the caps in the stack tend to have the same voltage across them.
--
John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc
lunatic fringe electronics
On a sunny day (Thu, 25 May 2017 08:23:31 -0700) it happened John Larkin wrote in :
Indeed, lipos will just go up in voltage if over charged. The 'equalizers' are sometimes just a parellel load system, like a zener, per cell, preventng the cell from going over 4.2 V. That way everything gets charged.
It's far from meaningless. It is just a measurement under different conditions. If your usage won't be for storing charge for over 72 hours this is a measurement that is more to your conditions.
On a sunny day (Thu, 25 May 2017 08:32:12 -0700) it happened John Larkin wrote in :
Real zeners would, although with -.7 or so volts I would not want to use those cells again... But usually you are talking about several amps charge current, and like Tim posted here some year ago, a transistor with a voltage sensor shorting out / limiting the voltage can be used. If it was a MOSFET with a reverse body diode, yes. Would have to be a logic level type that works far below 4.2 V Vgs on. Bipolar is nice here. No GHz :-)
ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.