Smash the robot cars

If you see a robot, kill it. If a robot gives orders while holding a steel weapon, obey.

Reply to
Alan Folmsbee
Loading thread data ...

What if it holds a baseball bat?

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. 
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
Reply to
Boris Mohar

best way to kill a robot is pee on it. will short it right out!

Reply to
sdy

Unless it is IP67 rated...

--

Rick C 

Viewed the eclipse at Wintercrest Farms, 
on the centerline of totality since 1998
Reply to
rickman

On a sunny day (Thu, 12 Oct 2017 12:56:28 -0400) it happened rickman wrote in :

I was thinking maybe one of those super magnets would help...

Reply to
Jan Panteltje

Like this:

formatting link

Reply to
Jan Panteltje

Jan Panteltje wrote on 10/12/2017 1:18 PM:

You've been watching too much TV.

formatting link

formatting link

--

Rick C 

Viewed the eclipse at Wintercrest Farms, 
on the centerline of totality since 1998
Reply to
rickman

On a sunny day (Thu, 12 Oct 2017 13:35:51 -0400) it happened rickman wrote in :

Right!

I was thinking we could bury those super-strong magnets like mines, and then when the Boston Dynamics weapons carrying bots run over it they?? those will glue themselves together... Even if not 100% made of metal that strong a field will affect hall sensors in their servos, their magnetic compass (they must have), they will fall to the ground glued with all 4 (or 6?) together.

So I suggest we start mass-production of those super magnets, start a new company, 'bot-mines'.

I did say it before, 'much of that dreamt up hightech can be disabled by the simplest low tech'.

Russia will read this too, anyways Boston Dynamics was sold to Japan IIRC.

formatting link

Somebody in guggle must have seen the flaw.

You can also throw magnets at those bots, or make a ceramic - or some other non-magnetic material gun shooting those. $$$$$$$$ to be made... Kim?

Reply to
Jan Panteltje

Hi Joe P. The magnets are a good start. Join the movement:

The Human League : Robot Division

The robots of the future must be manufactured in easily dividable sections so that a human can easily separate the offending robot into about seven safe pieces. the robot must be vulnerable to superior human judgements.

Reply to
Alan Folmsbee

On a sunny day (Fri, 13 Oct 2017 09:05:47 -0700 (PDT)) it happened Alan Folmsbee wrote in :

Problem is, that when even giving those bots the slightest AI they^H^H^H^H those will modify themselves and their factories and make laws that we humming beans have to obey...

Them bots will probably be networked with 6G or something, so we should be making jammers NOW, else.. well it is too late, one has taken over the country already, trump-bot. If not anything else it shows not much AI is needed :-)

So.. that leaves us electronix tinkers .. leaves the future to us.

When I was a kid, in the fifties, secretly listening to my crystal radio when everybody was sleeping, there was a play, where astronuts landed on some alien planet run by robots, and those robots played a big game, like chess, where big machines were cutting things on the board (planet), those astronuts managed to somehow disable the master controller, and escape...

rist

Reply to
Jan Panteltje

Must the robot be vulnerable to inferior human judgements? We have no shortage of those.

--

Rick C 

Viewed the eclipse at Wintercrest Farms, 
on the centerline of totality since 1998
Reply to
rickman

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.