Re: OT: Epstein: 'Conspiracy theorists' proved right again

What a coincidence!

> > Epstein is "suicided," meaning the "powerful men" complicit in his > sex trafficking crimes will never be prosecuted. > > Move along, nothing to see here!

Well, it's not all over yet. Let's see if the authorities proceed against Ghislain Maxwell (her father Robert, a newspaper magnate, also died in suspicious circumstances after fleecing a pension fund) who was Epstein's fixer; procured the underage girls for him. Then we'll know if they're serious about getting to the root of this or not.

--
This message may be freely reproduced without limit or charge only via  
the Usenet protocol. Reproduction in whole or part through other  
protocols, whether for profit or not, is conditional upon a charge of  
GBP10.00 per reproduction. Publication in this manner via non-Usenet  
protocols constitutes acceptance of this condition.
Reply to
Cursitor Doom
Loading thread data ...

That remains an interesting question, why she has not been charged. You'd think that even if they did not have a strong case against her, that she would have been arrested and charged at the same time. Put pressure on her, get her to flip, that's what they usually would do. On the other hand, if prosecutors were trying to cover this all up, why bring the new charges against Epstein at all?

Reply to
Whoey Louie

The prosecutors, the FBI, the NYC police are NOT monolithic organisations, though. They're made up from *mostly* decent people who want to see justice served. Unfortunately, however, there are elements within each which have been subverted and these elements often unaccountably end up ultimately calling all the shots to intervene in any cases involving high profile individuals. I've seen it happen over and over again, not just in N. America, but all over the world. :(

--
This message may be freely reproduced without limit or charge only via  
the Usenet protocol. Reproduction in whole or part through other  
protocols, whether for profit or not, is conditional upon a charge of  
GBP10.00 per reproduction. Publication in this manner via non-Usenet  
protocols constitutes acceptance of this condition.
Reply to
Cursitor Doom

Damn right! Just ask Patric Jane!!! It took him eight seasons... I mean -years- to get Red John because of the corruption.

--

  Rick C. 

  +++ Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging 
  +++ Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
Reply to
Rick C

What Cursiotr Doom "sees" is what the specialised media that feeds his tastes serves up to him. He wants to see the justice system as partially subverted, and gets offered fantasies that satisfies that wish.

Naturally, he "sees" it happen, because he wants to see it happen. Saner individuals go to the movies and watch enedless cowboy dramas and know that they are fantasies.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
Reply to
Bill Sloman

Cursitor Doom wrote in news:qipeke$uoe$ snipped-for-privacy@dont-email.me:

Like Trump not being charged with contempt of court back in the '80s when he was told to deliver records relating to his rental practices in a racial discrimination suit? Or the time the EPA and others all looked the other way when he spewed asbestos clouds all over NYC for weeks on end?

Subverted? That term hardly covers the criminal bevahior of the dopes at the top claiming to be "running the show".

Reply to
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno

I'd say Hillary being given a pass for having an emial server in her house that she passed classified information through should be on the list. Especially when a Navy submariner went to prison for taking a selfie that captured part of the classified section of a sub he was on. The selfie never left his phone. Hillary, why she swore under oath that she couldn't recall her training on classified document handling and that she thought the "C" in the margins of classified documents meant that was the "C" paragraph, even though there was no A, B, or D paragraph markings, only "C"'s. They even had her telling an aid who was having trouble faxing her a classified document through the secure system to take off the identifying information and email it to her. But Comey gave her a pass, he said she was extremely careless, but no worries, she gets a pass. So, yes, apparently different standards apply for peons versus at least some of those that are juiced up.

Reply to
Whoey Louie

Money talks louder in the USA than in most advanced industrial countries. I n the beginning you had to own property before you could vote, and while un iversal suffrage was eventually adopted - for males by 1856 - the system st ill works in a way that give people with money a disproportionate amount of power.

Trump had his father's money from the start, and his father's network of in fluence.

The system wasn't "subverted". It always ran like that.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
Reply to
Bill Sloman

Cursitor Doom wrote in news:qiqbam$gv9$3@dont- email.me:

What about him with the Prince? Funny how you seem to have a biased vocalization all the time.

Reply to
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno

Whoey Louie wrote in news:cdf88e02-4c07-4145- snipped-for-privacy@googlegroups.com:

training

With the level of information overload such a person undergoes, retaining priority memories likely take precedence over retaining trivial procedurals.

If we were never hacked it might be different, but since some lame twit decided to spill info despite the oath he took, and due to actual hacking, I'd say her home set-up was likely pretty good, but it no longer matters as idots like China hacked our F-35 plans and actually think they can spin a better version. Far more deeply classified than her stuff ever was.

Get off your little hobby horse, you crybaby Trumpesque bitch.

Reply to
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno

Whoey Louie wrote in news:cdf88e02-4c07-4145- snipped-for-privacy@googlegroups.com:

Negligence is far different than intentionally criminal.

The fact is her acts were mild by any measure. Comey even said so. You think they don't have a handle on things? Oh that's right... you are an abject idiot.

Cry us a river, stupid, brain warped twerp.

Reply to
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno

Whoey Louie wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@googlegroups.com:

You keep thinking that, stupid child.

Reply to
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno

Translation: Hillary has shit for brains. But I don't believe that, I think she knew damn well what the rules were, what the laws were, she just figured she was above it all and could do what she wanted to. And what she wanted was to have her email server hidden, under her control, so that no one would be able to see what she was up to. Her penchant for secrecy over the security of the US. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to know that the Sec of States emails should not be on a private server, being backed up God knows where, at unsecure, unapproved facilities. But keep trying to make excuses.

I see, so once there is any intrusion into any system, then no security procedures matter anymore. Why don't you post your passwords here for all of us?

and

Wrong, always wrong.

Reply to
Whoey Louie

Whoey Louie wrote in news:8fb64fa2-6b6c-4f33- snipped-for-privacy@googlegroups.com:

that,

No, idiot. The translation is that you have no clue what information overload is, much less the level of it in those offices.

In fact, you have zero clue as to why the Clinton's used their home network's server to handle their emails. You also have no clue as to any of the details of their home network. All you are doing is the repeat the blather petty mouthings about something you are clueless about. IOW, your standard googletard mo.

True translation, TraderTard4 has shit for brains. Oh... that's right... traderTard4 IS shit.

Reply to
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno

Whoey Louie wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@googlegroups.com:

Nice try, shitead.

Wow. A pussy boy like you, making, by your criteria, a threat. Maybe I should start one of your precious lits. (deliberate Usenet pussy boy spelling)

Post your name and address, I will come give you a security seminar, and you can watch as some of the shit of the world gets finally flushed.

Your view, however, would be looking up out of the toilet bowl, because the shit being flushed would be you.

Reply to
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno

Whoey Louie wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@googlegroups.com:

He did not get charged because he had a pic on his phone, idiot. He got charged for taking the picture to start with, which is what is NOT permitted.

You are a clueless loser, PieceOfShitTrader4.

Reply to
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno

Whoey Louie wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@googlegroups.com:

Yep, and no breeches makes them pretty mild.

Donald J. Trump should be down at GITMO right now then.

Shit = You = Your mother is a criminal

Your bloodline = Should Be Erased from the Human gene pool

>
Reply to
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno

Whoey Louie wrote in news:47106524-4690-4dc2- snipped-for-privacy@googlegroups.com:

You have serious reading comprehension issues, and you then bend what was stated into your inane little jokester posts.

Post your address, pussy boy. Hanna needs to come over for a visit.

Reply to
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno

Whoey Louie wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@googlegroups.com:

Yet another zero content peanut gallery s*****ad crack.

Sloman is literally miles above you, putz. And yes, he even knows more about what is going on here than a punk f*ck pussy boy putz like you ever will.

Everything you do is pretense, putz.

Reply to
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno

That's stupid even for you. To suggest that Hillary forgot how to handle classified information because of information overload. And then, overloaded to the point that she couldn't handle classified information, she ran for president.

ROFL!

That's not true, from the investigations we know the important details, like that it was backed up at several sites around the country, none of which were govt authorized, none of which were secure to handle classified info. Are there more details that are worse? Yet she got a pass, while the Navy submariner went to prison for a selfie that captured part of the sub and that never went beyond his phone.

Reply to
Whoey Louie

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.