Please stop cross posting to unrelaed groups.
- Vote on answer
- posted
16 years ago
Re: Is The King James Version The Only Perfect Translation Of The Bible?
Loading thread data ...
- posted
16 years ago
Not only is translating historical text problamatic and by far "perfect",
> there are also other factors involved that keep the history from being perfect.
To insinuate that *any* text with no known originals would remain true to the time period of 1,600 years (and earlier) prior to it's inception is absurd.
KJV was assembled from 1601 to 1611 (IIRC) and since that time has undergone several several major revisions. "The New International Version" of the Bible is a mockery of the original content.... so how can anyone actually believe that during the assembly of the KJV and given the alterations that have occurred in just the past 400 years, that anything which was allegedly written from 1400 years (to unknown ages preceeding the alleged life and times of the Christ) possibly be expected to retain it's integrity until 1600?