OT: The Worst Liar

Aside from the Russian bit it isn't surprising to most of the planet that Trump has had more of his advisors go to jail than any other president since Richard Nixon.

(not hiding this link behind a tinyurl that could take one anywhere)

So, perhaps the big fish got away as there wasn't enough evidence, but many others were caught.

You do understand that 'not enough evidence' is not the same as totally innocent, right?

John

Trump the kinda guy who surrounded himself with a ton of now-convicted criminals but obsesses about the media being "liars."

Maybe he rationalizes it by believing those are his kind of scum and the media is a different kind of scum.

Gas prices are goin' up again he better keep an eye on that with respect to things Americans actually cast votes about

It has to be Trump. His past colleagues are being sent to jail in droves, and he keeps on claiming that the investigation was a witch-hunt.

It's by no means the only thing he lies about

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

No, I doubt he can understand that.

Here's an example of his "understanding"... (RT==Russia Today)

On 31/08/17 22:59, Cursitor Doom wrote: > On Thu, 31 Aug 2017 11:22:14 -0700, lonmkusch wrote: > >> While you're deciding, I think I'm going to stroll over to RT for some >> good unbiased news. > > If you can't see that RT is a zillion times more reputable as a news > source than CNN/NBC/BBC et al, you must be totally blind. Sure they > aren't 100% impartial; no news organisation is. But they are my most > trusted news source even if not yours - until such time as I ever > discover otherwise, of course.

Cursitor Doom wrote in news:q7h1mj$72p$ snipped-for-privacy@dont-email.me:

The investigation was thorough, dipshit.

The FBI is familiar with half asses, but the picture next to the definition is one of you.

God damn, boy... get over it. Grow the f*ck up.

Eeyore is a complete ass.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

Bill Sloman seems to believe that there is a single "universal troll" here who goes by the nyms of - inter alia - "Eeyore" and "Always Wrong". Whether these individuals are real and if so, whether they are one person or two entirely different individuals is not known. But one thing is for sure and that is that Bill believes that anyone who consistently disagrees with him is "Always Wrong" or "Eeyore" and that they are the same person. In Bill's mind, it's *impossible* for more than one person to find fault with his postings so any criticism levelled against him must come from one single, highly-deranged individual. I am happy to confirm, though of course Bill won't accept it, that I have

*never* posted under either of these two identities and neither am I the least bit familiar with the content of the posts attributed to them/him/ her. Sorry, Bill.

--
This message may be freely reproduced without limit or charge only via  
the Usenet protocol. Reproduction in whole or part through other  
protocols, whether for profit or not, is conditional upon a charge of  
GBP10.00 per reproduction. Publication in this manner via non-Usenet  
protocols constitutes acceptance of this condition.

I'm afraid Bill, like most people, lacks the objectivity to be able to see himself as others see him. In his own mind, he's super-smart and everyone else is a dumbass. That's not quite how everyone else sees him, though. ;->

--
This message may be freely reproduced without limit or charge only via  
the Usenet protocol. Reproduction in whole or part through other  
protocols, whether for profit or not, is conditional upon a charge of  
GBP10.00 per reproduction. Publication in this manner via non-Usenet  
protocols constitutes acceptance of this condition.

I remember your actual name, and easily recognized your writing style, content, and personality upon your re-appearance. Utterly, completely different to former-poster Eyeore (Graham). It's weird that others can't distinguish. Or maybe I'm the odd one for being able to.

Anyway, cheers!

James Arthur

able to. "

Getting like that. I never really paid attention though. Asshole number 412 , asshole number 413, Smith W 6079, who cares ?

You get rid of them with your filters, which do not have, or if I do I don' t know how to evoke them. But then why ignore assholes ? Let them have thei r point of f***ed up view published and not know to respond ? Doesn't seem logical to me, for those who like to win arguments.

But you can't win an argument with a kangaroo, he will kick the chess board right off the table and think he won. I estimate about 5% under Sloman in human cognizance. they are not quite as smart as dogs.

Many thanks for that! FWIW, I'm the same myself. I can spot someone using sock puppets before the end of their first sentence. I've also marvelled at the inability of others to be able to discern likewise. So be reassured that you're not alone! :-)

--
This message may be freely reproduced without limit or charge only via  
the Usenet protocol. Reproduction in whole or part through other  
protocols, whether for profit or not, is conditional upon a charge of  
GBP10.00 per reproduction. Publication in this manner via non-Usenet  
protocols constitutes acceptance of this condition.

Completely wrong. "Always Wrong " is krw's name for the guy who currently posts as Decadent Linux User Numero Uno. He has had other nyms. Eeyore was not one of them.

Eeyore and Cursitor Doom do seem to be the same person.

Always Wrong is krw's label. Even a stopped clock is right twice a day.

Not true.

Clearly untrue. You don't have to be highly deranged to disagree with me - misinformed will do it. There have been occasions where I have been misinformed, and admitted it.

Nobody has ever suggested that you posted under any of the names that got labelled "Always Wrong" by krw.

Your denial of ever having posted as "Eeyore" is not to be trusted. It's of no practical importance - you are an ass, as this post has demonstrated, once again.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

Objectivity doesn't help much there. The way other people see you depends too much on them for anybody to hold a particuarly reliable opinion.

In my own mind, I'm smart, but everybody else includes quite a few people who are just as smart and - in some areas - smarter.

Cursitor Doom isn't one of them. He's not as clearly brain-damaged as krw but he seems to be about as gullible as John Larkin.

Sure. There are lots of people around who are out of touch with reality. Few as far out of touch as Cursitor Doom, of course.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney 
>  
>  
>  
> --  
> This message may be freely reproduced without limit or charge only via  
> the Usenet protocol. Reproduction in whole or part through other  
> protocols, whether for profit or not, is conditional upon a charge of  
> GBP10.00 per reproduction. Publication in this manner via non-Usenet  
> protocols constitutes acceptance of this condition.

If James Arthur didn't have such silly ideas about politics and economics, I'd be worried.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

12, asshole number 413, Smith W 6079, who cares ?

n't know how to evoke them. But then why ignore assholes ? Let them have th eir point of f***ed up view published and not know to respond ? Doesn't see m logical to me, for those who like to win arguments.

rd right off the table and think he won.

Jurb thinks that arguing involves chess boards.

as smart as dogs.

Jurb's power of estimation isn't impressive. He thinks that Trump is doing a good job.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

"though of course Bill won't accept it" - 'nuff said.

-- This message may be freely reproduced without limit or charge only via the Usenet protocol. Reproduction in whole or part through other protocols, whether for profit or not, is conditional upon a charge of GBP10.00 per reproduction. Publication in this manner via non-Usenet protocols constitutes acceptance of this condition.

Not in the least surprising that you would like to replace the Constitution with something else which suits you and your pal Soros much better. Something that rather than conferring rights and freedoms, eliminates them.

--
This message may be freely reproduced without limit or charge only via  
the Usenet protocol. Reproduction in whole or part through other  
protocols, whether for profit or not, is conditional upon a charge of  
GBP10.00 per reproduction. Publication in this manner via non-Usenet  
protocols constitutes acceptance of this condition.

The German constitution does eliminate the freedom to re-establish the Nazi party, but in most other respects it does a lot better than the current US constitution.

George Soros does seem to figure prominently in your sillier conspiracy theories. If the US government were to go through the kind of externally encouraged correction that it has visited on a number of other countries, he'd be unlikely have a hand in it.

I was making a comic prediction, not offering advice - you probably can't recognise satire when you see it because it isn't any more absurd than the drivel which your "news sources" serve up to you.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney