OT: Shocking news

Comedian?

--
John Larkin         Highland Technology, Inc 

lunatic fringe electronics
 Click to see the full signature
Reply to
John Larkin
Loading thread data ...

Liars lie. Did you expect otherwise?

Reply to
krw

Wow, imagine meetings between Newt and some EC bigwigs. What fun.

--
John Larkin         Highland Technology, Inc 

lunatic fringe electronics
 Click to see the full signature
Reply to
John Larkin

Prosperity works for me. Too bad there are 95M who can't find jobs.

Reply to
krw

Which is exactly what the lefties in this group are doing.

Reply to
krw

ael Terrell:

hat Newt

ghly

Over

ey

y know

get

that

. It

that

r to

oter fraud after more or less discounting it earlier (more or less because they did leave wiggle room that the Russians might hack the vote in Trump's favor).

ment again.

eotype of all working-class-whites-are-bigots, much less refraining from it ?

,

lamestream elites don't (NSFW):

he is actually an actor playing a news reporter, that a made up character makes more sense that actual news says a lot

Reply to
Lasse Langwadt Christensen

You seem to conflate harsh words with thinly-veiled threats to fire off a few rounds in retaliation for them. Perhaps that's one of the few methods of self-expression you're familiar with, but I assure you they're not really in the same ballpark.

I would say that whatever words liberals say that offend you, my best guess is that the overwhelming majority of us don't go to bed thinking "Gosh, I wonder what I can do tomorrow to make Conservatives suffer a bit more." While you probably feel his methods were misguided, if Obama woke up tomorrow and every jobless Conservative had suddenly become employed by a new business I'm sure there would be few people more pleased than he would be.

Conversely, a large fraction of the anti-Left posts I see here are chock full of violent, vengeful fantasies. Sadly, I can only conclude that the main reason for the rage is simply because it's an amusing pastime; because it's fun.

Reply to
bitrex

I have literally talked to parents who had their own children shot to death by gang members who were far less angry at the assailants than some of the posters here seem to be over...mean names someone somewhere called them.

Reply to
bitrex

Sort of like that time SNL ran a "spoof" debate show and the comedians just read the transcript of the debates verbatim

Reply to
bitrex

Ah, the little snowflake is scareded.

Bullshit. You go to bed thinking about how you can control (everyone). If you don't those you support *certainly* do. The ends justify the means (which you do believe in).

You're full of shit but I'm not telling anyone anything new.

Reply to
krw

Jamie's judgement about who might be the sharpest tool in the shed is not entirely reliable. Intellectually speaking, he's not even a tool - he's of absolutely no use to anybody, except perhaps as an example of what the gullible half-wit might be thinking.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
Reply to
bill.sloman

What's even more impressive is that experts sometimes can. John Larkin doesn't know about that kind of stuff, and doesn't realise that there's information out there that he could know if he worked at finding it out.

formatting link

What he does know has been spoon fed to him by the Murdoch media, and he doesn't know enough to realise that they aren't entirely reliable.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
Reply to
bill.sloman

ael Terrell:

hat Newt

ghly

Over

ey

y

that

r to

Probably not the whole story.

Not that I've noticed. I've certainly spent time pointing out that Clinton labelled half of Trumps's supporters as deplorable, which was only a quarte r of the population, at most.

That kind of threat has been made here from time to time, but never acted o n. Nobody in their right mind would be scared about it, but one has to wond er about the mental health standards that make it any kind of remotely tole rable behaviour. Making that kind of threat doesn't make you a dangerous nu tter, but there are dangerous nutters who have made that kind of threat bef ore delivering on it.

Krw is confident enough about what he knows to make that kind of assertion. If he had a working brain in his head he'd realise that that it had to be total nonsense - he's merely articulated what he believes to be the communi st agenda (not that any communist would have expressed it quite that way). The fact that he thinks that socialists think that way is pure ignorance - the socialists kicked Marx out of the movement in 1870 precisely because th ey thought that that particular aberration would lead to tyranny, which it did.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney 
> > 
 Click to see the full signature
Reply to
bill.sloman

Oh no! Buchanan-fodder?

Reply to
Bill Martin

Anybody who has been censured for an ethics violation isn't a good choice for dealing with people who might bribe him.

Since they shut Bedlam to the public there haven't been any obvious options.

The house of Representatives has a minority leader, but there's no post of rabid minority leader, because there's no official rabid minority party - the Tea Party is merely a rabid faction of the Republican Party.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
Reply to
bill.sloman

They'd give him money, and both sides would emerge happy. The US national interest might not. What did you think being censured for ethics violations actually means?

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
Reply to
bill.sloman

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

Yeah, sure, when a candidate I dislike least doesn't win, I totally lose it; I threaten to leave the country (but never do), blame everyone but the candidate, go out in the streets and riot and burn cars and shoot people just like Conserva... no, wait.

After all these years it's fairly clear that Dems vote with their emotions instead of their brains *and assume everyone else does too*.

Carry your own emotional baggage, boy. I won't do it for you.

Mark L. Fergerson

Reply to
Alien8752

There are perfectly rational reasons for being upset that the least qualified candidate for president ever has won a majority of the electoral college votes.

There's nothing emotional about being unhappy that a candidate distinguished only by "Talents for low intrigue, and the little arts of popularity" has won the election.

We can only hope that the electoral college does the job it was designed to do, and throws him out.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
Reply to
bill.sloman

Tell me, after you beat your wife, do you get even angrier when she tells you she wants a divorce?

Why would I blame someone who isn't deserving of blame?

Nobody has shot anyone. However, I do know that Conservative guys here constantly post and fantasize about getting a chance to use their arsenal, to the point that one can only assume they must get some quasi-sexual thrill out of it.

Reply to
bitrex

He doesn't believe it, because to his mind it's a totally ridiculous notion that anyone in the world isn't constantly pondering how they can control him, as it's clear that's what _he_ thinks about a great majority of the time. If someone tells him different, the only "rational" explanation must be that they're simply lying to him.

In psychology, this is known as "projection."

Reply to
bitrex

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.