-- This message may be freely reproduced without limit or charge only via the Usenet protocol. Reproduction in whole or part through other protocols, whether for profit or not, is conditional upon a charge of GBP10.00 per reproduction. Publication in this manner via non-Usenet protocols constitutes acceptance of this condition.
Nice to know, if a trifle late for me! I suffered so much verbal abuse from Greenies for cruising around in my '63 Ford Galaxie doing 8mpg on a run, whereas I should really have received a Nobel Prize for helping to save the planet!
--
This message may be freely reproduced without limit or charge only via
the Usenet protocol. Reproduction in whole or part through other
protocols, whether for profit or not, is conditional upon a charge of
GBP10.00 per reproduction. Publication in this manner via non-Usenet
protocols constitutes acceptance of this condition.
IOW, he saw through their blatant BS and called them out on it. That's an unforgivable sin to the Lefties, who get angry and confused when confronted by contradictory evidence.
--
This message may be freely reproduced without limit or charge only via
the Usenet protocol. Reproduction in whole or part through other
protocols, whether for profit or not, is conditional upon a charge of
GBP10.00 per reproduction. Publication in this manner via non-Usenet
protocols constitutes acceptance of this condition.
He did no such thing. The U.S.branch of Greenpeace took control of the move ment away from him, which spurred him to look for other sources of income. It's quite clear that he's nothing less than a mouthpiece. His formal educa tion is in Forestry which has done nothing to enable him to begin to unders tand the sciences recruited for the investigation of global warming. He's a rank opportunist that has familiarized himself enough with the environment al movement to use it as a selling point to offer his public relationship s ervices to every and any industry vulnerable to attack. Here's another video or your boy, the idiot.
He's not "my boy" - I could care less about this issue. I'm simply pointing out that there are enough doubts among the non-compromised scientific community to enable me at least to sleep at night. You might too if you took a more balanced view and listened to alternative opinions exposing this racket for the crock it is.
--
This message may be freely reproduced without limit or charge only via
the Usenet protocol. Reproduction in whole or part through other
protocols, whether for profit or not, is conditional upon a charge of
GBP10.00 per reproduction. Publication in this manner via non-Usenet
protocols constitutes acceptance of this condition.
ovement away from him, which spurred him to look for other sources of incom e.
John Larkin's views about anthropogenic global warming are provided by the denialist web-sites that the gullible twit is silly enough to believe.
The people who pay for that propaganda do want to keep on making money by e xtracting fossil carbon and selling it as fuel, so to that extent John Lark in is correct, but he hasn't noticed that people who are lying to him are m aking a lot more money out of their position than Al Gore makes out of his.
Al Gore got shown the way by Roger Revelle. His book, "Earth in the Balance " was published in 1992, long before anybody looked like making any money o ut of the issue. At the time Revelle died (1991) the evidence that global w arming was actually happening had only just crept over the noise level.
It's the denialist rubbish that Cursitor Doom and John Larkin are silly enough to be suckered by which is the actual crock here, not that either has the wit - let alone the background knowledge - to be able to realise this.
ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.