I'm cross posting this, because I like to rant here so much =)
Perhaps because there are liberals, government orcs, and academics parasites around. Anyways, a movie about Hollywood and the Democratic party as it really is under the media propaganda and university political correctness?
Note that this movie is showing on HBO this month. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> Movie Review: 'People I Know' by Yggdrasil
>
>
> If I had unlimited resources, the first movie I would produce would
> be a dramatization of the corrupt and cynical way in which the inner
> party* dominated racial extortion coalition operates.
>
> It would vividly show how sexual vice is used to control media
> celebrities and politicians, how violence is used when necessary, and
> perhaps most important, how the constituent racial and ethnic groups
> in this coalition all use each other and basically hate each other.
>
> But miraculously, an outer party liberal - Robert Redford - has
> produced it for me.
>
> It is called "People I Know."
>
> "People I Know" is an overt and explicit attack on the racial
> extortion coalition.
>
> In some respects, it is similar to "Eyes Wide Shut", but is much more
> explicit. The average soccer mom would miss entirely the ethnic
> driver behind the system of social control revealed in "Eyes Wide
> Shut."
>
> The "J word" pops up in the middle of "People I Know" and is used
> with increasing frequency through the climactic conclusion. You even
> get to see an inner party cabal in action - complete with
> billionaires, media barons, a Rabbi and bands of armed izzy
> bodyguards.
>
> It is available for rental at Hollywood video (and I assume,
> Blockbuster) and available for sale on EBAY for from $7 to $15.
>
> The protagonist of the movie, played by Al Pacino, is a public
> relations crisis manager specializing in covering up scandals for
> movie stars and politicians. He is an "old school" inner party
> "civil- rights" liberal. His passion and his cause is setting up a
> fund raising dinner to raise money for the legal defense of some
> Haitian black illegals threatened with deportation.
>
> He gets a call from his one remaining client, a movie star (played by
> Ryan O'Neil) to bail out a young starlet/prostitute who managed to
> get herself arrested.
>
> It turns out that the young starlet was on a mission for the actor
> (who wants to run for a U.S. Senate seat) to infiltrate and
> photograph the goings on at a super model pleasure palace run by an
> inner party billionaire named Scharansky for the purpose of
> corrupting and then controlling politicians (lowering their cost and
> increasing the predictability of their votes).
>
> The actor wants the film because Scharansky is supporting some other
> candidate for the Senate seat he wants, and the actor needs the goods
> on Scharansky's pleasure palace in order to force Scharansky to
> shift his substantial support and money to his own campaign effort.
>
> Unaware of all this, Pacino's IP character visits one Reverend Block,
> a black leader in Harlem to get him to attend the fundrasing dinner
> - at which point the hostility between black and inner party surfaces
> explicitly.
>
> He next visits Scharansky for the purpose of persuading him to attend
> the fund raising dinner for Haitian immigrants, and here we are
> informed that Scharansky could care less about Haitian immigrants,
> hates Reverend Block - who he accuses of calling the IP "hooked nosed
> devils" - and desperately wants to know where the young actress'
> "toy" containing the incriminating pictures might be.
>
> Pacino's character tirelessly tries to convince people to come to his
> fundraiser, and despite the fact that none of these liberals cares
> about Haitian immigrants, and almost all say they will not attend, in
> the end every one of them attends because of the opportunity to work
> the rest of the crowd for money, influence and glamor.
>
> The cynicism at the party - scratching one another's eyes out in
> private conversations while striking happy, multi-culti poses for the
> camera is quite revealing, juxtaposed as it is with old photographs
> of 1960's civil rights marches and pictures of MLK delivering his
> famous IP ghosted speeches.
>
> While it is always hazardous to speculate about the subjective
> intentions of the producer, I suspect that these photos of the 1960s
> civil rights era were intended to shame a liberal audience into
> rejecting the cynicism and elitism of modern multi-culturalism and
> embrace the "old idealism" of the cause.
>
> But when viewed objectively, the 1960's civil rights movement is made
> to appear equally cynical by its juxtaposition with the attitudes
> and behavior of its current standard bearers.
>
> When the movie ends, I am left sitting on the sofa wondering exactly
> how and why such a movie could ever be made in the first place. It is
> a clear threat gesture. The film played only in a few "art houses"
> in New York and Los Angeles before being released on DVD. While
> expensive acting talent was employed, there was essentially no ad
> budget, and the public at large is completely unaware of this film's
> existence.
>
> It looks like Redford and his backers (the outer party faction in the
> racial extortion coalition) has been angered by the Sharanskys of
> the world and has produced this movie as a warning shot across the
> bow, so to speak.
>
> It is a frank confession that the racial extortion coalition is a
> fragile one, and that while the blacks have been unhappy with their
> subordinate role for many years, the appearance of this film tells me
> that the outer party liberals have now joined them.
>
> The fact that this movie was made is good news for us.
>
> Buy a copy and enjoy.
>
> -----------------------------------------------
>
> *The term "inner party" (or IP) comes from Orwell and refers to the
> group which actually controls things. Ygg regularly uses the term in
> his writings to refer to a certain powerful ethnic group.
>
>
>