OT: Climate change in the New Yorker

Only John Larkin would need to ask. It isn't. It exists to deliver information in a form that is relatively easy to read, and concerns itself primarily with the quality of the writing (though the content needs to be defensible too).

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
Reply to
bill.sloman
Loading thread data ...

After the Greenland glaciers are gone, why wouldn't the Gulf Stream.restart. During the melting period, this may be an issue.

Churchill is at 59N in continental climate, London at 51N is clearly oceanic climate and Oslo, Stockholm, Helsinki and St. Petersburg at

60N in a mixed climate.
Reply to
upsidedown

Historically the thermohaline circulation conveyor is (at least) bistable. The bottom line is: salinity leads to non-linearity which causes the existence of multiple equilibria and thresholds in the THC.

A reasonable starting point that I found by googling "thermohaline circulation" is

formatting link
with a more detailed version at
formatting link

You are probably right; I only looked quickly on a low-res map. However, I don't think it really changes the point. Have a look at "Figure 3. Deviation of surface air temperature from zonal mean" in the above reference.

Reply to
Tom Gardner

Well, Bill Sloman reckons it's okay, so i guess the answer is "yes". ;->

-- This message may be freely reproduced without limit or charge only via the Usenet protocol. Reproduction in whole or part through other protocols, whether for profit or not, is conditional upon a charge of GBP10.00 per reproduction. Publication in this manner via non-Usenet protocols constitutes acceptance of this condition.

Reply to
Cursitor Doom

Don't get me wrong, I really like the New Yorker and consider it one of the best magazines out there, however I found that article too much to take seriously.

It seems to me that there is a lot of pressure to print climate disaster stories...

John

Reply to
John Robertson

Bad logic. But then again, Cursitor Doom probably doesn't know what a peer-reviewed scientific journal is, never having gotten stuck with referring a paper for one of them.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
Reply to
bill.sloman

Except that it wasn't any kind of climate disaster story. If anything it concentrated on why nothing effective was happening to put off what looks as if it might be a climate disaster.

Which makes it a political disaster story.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
Reply to
bill.sloman

If you snipped out every piece that contains "climate" and "Trump", the NY Times would be nothing but ads for watches and handbags, and NPR would go back to playing classical music all day.

--

John Larkin         Highland Technology, Inc 
picosecond timing   precision measurement  

jlarkin att highlandtechnology dott com 
http://www.highlandtechnology.com
Reply to
John Larkin

And in an ideal world, would impending doom create less pressure? Or more? Or would there be a lot of pressure to suppress climate disaster stories? That's what I'm seeing, and it stinks. Mann deserves a verdict on this, but National Review is still stalling.

Reply to
whit3rd

e:

ime.

n

There are a range of journalistic standards, and Fox News isn't into compet ing on intellectual quality.

John Larkin does seem to be peculiarly sensitive to stories that he doesn't want to be exposed to.

Trump's defects are remarkably ostentatious (like his buildings) and respec table newspapers feel they have a duty to report them. There must be other subjects than climate filling the occasional gaps between revelations about Trump's failings, but John Larkin only seems to react to the climate chang e reports.

Clearly an observer effect.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
Reply to
bill.sloman

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.