OT: Bill Sloman's Exemplary Paradise

They officially gave up communism. The government there still has its fingers in a very large number of businesses, which is a communist principle.

Reply to
lonmkusch
Loading thread data ...

It's not called the Clinton News Network for nothing. Their election coverage was nothing short of scandalous: blatant anti-Trump propaganda and a clear attempt to subvert the democratic process. And it didn't stop after the Inauguration either; intensified if anything - and that's saying something.

--
This message may be freely reproduced without limit or charge only via  
the Usenet protocol. Reproduction in whole or part through other  
 Click to see the full signature
Reply to
Cursitor Doom

It's not called the Clinton News Network you numbskull.

"Clear attempt to subvert the democratic process". Ha ha. You might be th inking of what Trump is attempting to do.

I truly find it amazing how some people claim major news networks to be gen erating all trash. I don't even say that about Fox News. Yeah it leans ri ght but it's generally OK if the reader has their own mind.

You might instead be upset that CNN was reporting some of the ridiculous th ings the Trump administration was doing, like when Spicer held a news confe rence to proclaim his inaugural crowd was the biggest ever. Only a highly insecure person makes a big deal out of something like this.

Reply to
lonmkusch

Cursitor Doom hasn't remembered that his kill-filing system is time-limited.

It doesn't protect him from stuff he doesn't like to read for as long as he'd like. If he had enough sense to remember things like that he might have enough sense to realise why it makes sense to read stuff you don't agree with.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
Reply to
bill.sloman

Cursitor Doom's idea of who can be relied on to correctly identify a purveyor of fake news, is about as sound as his idea of which news sources can be relied on.

He trusts Russian Today, and they haven't told him that they publish fake news.

The UK media regulator, Ofcom, has repeatedly found RT to have breached rules on impartiality, and to have broadcast "materially misleading" content.

Ofcom trumps Cursitor Doom.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
Reply to
bill.sloman

Showing Trump as he really was?

It's now even more obvious that Trump doesn't know enough to do the job of being president of the United States of America. What is CNN supposed to do? Suppress the news that Trump pardoned Joe Arpaio?

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
Reply to
bill.sloman

Russia gave up communist ideology in 1990. The practical essence of communi sm - the leading role of the party - managed to survive that. Russia now pr etty much the same oligarchy-ridden disaster that it was before 1990. They' ve just given up paying lip-service to socialist ideals.

Your incapacity to perceive this is part and parcel of your other cognitive deficits.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
Reply to
bill.sloman

Except that from time to time I get things wrong, and admit it. Cursitor Doom rarely get anything right, so he hasn't run into this yet.

Google was incorporated September 4, 1998. My first post here goes back to 1996.

As if Cursitor Doom could recognise a coherent argument, let alone generate one.

In fact he has poached a Turing-test joke I ran on Winfield Hill back in the 1990's. I wasn't silly enough to suggest that Google might be running the simulation under test - they'd barely got under way back then.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
Reply to
bill.sloman

It *used to* lean Right. Relatively recently, however, it's switched to Leftward-leaning.

They made a "big deal" out of it because the Clinton News Network showed a partially-assembled crowd 6 hours before the ceremony but claimed it was contemporaneous with Trump taking the Oath of Office and juxtaposed edited shots of the partially-assembled crowd with much later shots of the swearing-in to give the false impression the entire ceremony was poorly attended. This is the kind of thing they do all the time yet you can't see through it! You don't know *anything* - no wonder the world's in the state it's in with fools like you allowed to vote!

--
This message may be freely reproduced without limit or charge only via  
the Usenet protocol. Reproduction in whole or part through other  
 Click to see the full signature
Reply to
Cursitor Doom

LOL! IOW, RT publishes inconvenient truths the Establishment would much rather remain unpublicised.

--
This message may be freely reproduced without limit or charge only via  
the Usenet protocol. Reproduction in whole or part through other  
 Click to see the full signature
Reply to
Cursitor Doom

Not really. It's just started to notice that Trump is left than perfect.

It's gone from far-right to merely right-leaning, which probably means that Murdoch has decided that Trump is too incompetent to be worth flattering.

formatting link

Sadly, Cursitor Doom comes across as the gullible fool.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
Reply to
bill.sloman

Au contraire! All chemistry is electronic. Well, maybe not 'nuclear chemistry'... you know what I mean.

What you mean, is 'computers are electrical'. Still not completely accurate, but all MODERN computers eschew the mechanical components of yesteryear. Still, it's amazing to pull out a 194x era article on Harmonic Analyzers, and see the mechanical Fourier transforms of yesteryear.

O. Mader really EARNED his Dr. Ing. degree.

Reply to
whit3rd

John Larkin isn't electronic either, and he's a lot more frightened of transformer design than I am, or anything else that involves minimal mathematical insight (which isn't electronic either).

Sci.electronics.design is about designing electronics, and John Larkin fondly believes this includes his tinker-with-it-until-it-works approach.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
Reply to
bill.sloman

For example, see "Harmonic Analyzer Mechanical Fourier Computer." It has 4 Youtube videos that cover Introduction, Synthesis, Analysis, and Operation.

formatting link
computer/

Reply to
Steve Wilson

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.