Oil Producers Are Burning Enough 'Waste' Gas to Power Every Home in Texas !

I'm happy that you're not physically here.

snipped-for-privacy@optonline.net wrote in news:2b5fd28a-73a4-43ed-ad1b- snipped-for-privacy@googlegroups.com:

VERTICAL. As in To the roof, Alice.

You are a stupid f*ck!

snipped-for-privacy@optonline.net wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@googlegroups.com:

So, you are a Usenet retard as well? Hey dumbfuck4, the entire thread is visible, you stupid piece of shit.

That is aside from the FACT that you are INCORRECT.

snipped-for-privacy@optonline.net wrote in news:43e18afe-63d6-47c1-94f1- snipped-for-privacy@googlegroups.com:

Proof that you have zero electrical knowledge.

snipped-for-privacy@optonline.net wrote in news:51217bab-0102-4f8c-a520- snipped-for-privacy@googlegroups.com:

energy

The scenario is a chimney in a stone structure. The GOAL was never "to really save energy". The goal is to charge a high capacity battery bank which can be relied on in a power outage.

That way, a man (not you obviously) can have his local service, his natural or petroleum gas fired backup generator, and his high capacity battery storage system firing a high end UPS, with a side benefit of powering several low power requisite devices within the household.

Ours also had a 25kW line conditioning transformer set on the whole thing.

Now, that battery storage system can be charged by several means, many of which can pump into it at the same time.

So several low output devices slowly charge and keep topped off, the battery system.

You seem to be hung up thinking something has to have the ability to power the entire home, when all that needs to be done is add electrons to the existing streams on the charger input port. The number and rate does not matter. That is the part you don't get.

It utilizes heat. So where do you get the bent perception that it generates heat?

You're surely an idiot, needlessly spewing stupid shit. And you are even doing it repeat fashion, just like your buddy Donald J. Trump does.

snipped-for-privacy@optonline.net wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@googlegroups.com:

Doctors using billing software to make fraudulent insurance claims for other than medical procedures, which they pay all or part of.

Fraud is fraud, and the viscious cycle will not end becuase the US gov and the IRS are quite happy about the whole thing.

A vertical exhaust vent is still an exhaust vent. You told us your ever changing home had no exhausts period.

No, proof that you're an imbecile. The obvious point is that it's just 40W and it's only that if it's a hot chimney, which is a fraction of the time. Actually, if you care about energy and/or have a brain, you have a high eff furnace and the chimney isn't used except for effect, so this is all BS. But even if you had a heat source, figure out what that small amount of electricity is worth, it's about $10 a year. Now figure out what it costs to get wire from a chimney somewhere all the way to a battery in the garage. And that's just the cost of that piece, not for the device, for the install of it, etc. It's not an issue of electricity, it's that it's an economic disaster and stupid.

BTW, why is it that I make one post and you have to reply to it in 3 separate posts?

Oh my, how the goal posts keep shifting. This was a thread about recovering waste heat from oil wells burning off natural gas. You then proposed to do similar with chimneys. This is the first time you've mentioned power outages. But, heh, I'll play. You propose some non-existent device, based on tech you can't describe that will produce 40W from a chimney, then you get that run over to a battery somewhere in a garage that can be used to charge USB devices. That's the new metrics? Yes?

OK, since the goal is battery for a power outage, how about I just skip all your BS, put a battery in the garage and hook it up to a charger? Hello? I can charge a hell of a lot of USB devices during a power outage from just that and it's cost is orders of magnitude less than your pile of crap. Problem solved.

Even more moronic. With a generator, which would cost less than your whole pile of crap, why would I need your pile of crap invention?

Well, bully for you, as if that has any relevance.

Yes, it's already totally stupid and economically unviable, let's make it even more complicated. And what was the problem we were trying to solve again?

No, I get it. I never said anything about it powering the home. I accepted your ~40W number. That's 40W when a chimney is hot. For starters, if you care about not wasting energy, then a chimney shouldn't be hot to begin with. You use a high eff furnace, boiler, etc. But even if you had a chimney used for heating, it's only going to be hot a fraction of the time. I gave you the math, you get a whopping ~$10 worth of electricity out of your abortion that costs how much? Oh, you can't say, nor can you even tell us what technology it uses. If you could answer that, we could begin to estimate cost.

I meant the chimney is needlessly spewing heat, because if you give a damn about energy or money, then you aren't using a chimney for heat. You look at houses with chimneys and assume they are hooked up to furnaces, boilers or fireplaces that are used for heating. That's just wrong. If you care about energy and/or money, you use a high eff furnace, problem solved, no need for your silly widget, nor would it work, because there is no heat.

Typical, make more stupid assumptions, just like looking at chimneys.

snipped-for-privacy@optonline.net wrote in news:5d299d82-4e47-4b29-b188- snipped-for-privacy@googlegroups.com:

You are confused, child.

The earlier discussion was about the 14 chimney stone structure.

The last post... this one you are going off on as 'ever changing' is a completely different house, you retarded, can't keep up, illiterate, senile, alzheimers ridden dipshit.

snipped-for-privacy@optonline.net wrote in news:d5a49096-b3fe-491c-8a13- snipped-for-privacy@googlegroups.com:

You're an idiot.

snipped-for-privacy@optonline.net wrote in news:e7a91907-9805-4102-95e4- snipped-for-privacy@googlegroups.com:

Nope been the same from the first. The battery gets trickle charged. That scenario has been stated from the beginning.

You do understand, punk, that batteries get charged at rates much smaller than the rate it gets consumed at.

The only thing that got shifted was your IQ, and you self imposed your retardation level! Ha! You stink, s*****ad.

snipped-for-privacy@optonline.net wrote in news:e7a91907-9805-4102-95e4- snipped-for-privacy@googlegroups.com:

Having problems understanding Usenet now, punk?