The command line barely changes between versions. That command is the same since Win 2k.
The command line barely changes between versions. That command is the same since Win 2k.
-- Reply in group, but if emailing add one more zero, and remove the last word.
I would add /f to force crashed programs to abort.
-- Reply in group, but if emailing add one more zero, and remove the last word.
Only if there are power outages. But it won't hang!
John
That one had a number as well: 3.5
-- Failure does not prove something is impossible, failure simply indicates you are not using the right tools... nico@nctdevpuntnl (punt=.) --------------------------------------------------------------
No, IDIOT. It was the FIRST Windows operating system that went by a NAME. Windows NT. Do get clueless on us. Don't prove that it is too late to take that warning either.
*Guffaw*
AlwayWrong again! What about Windows For Workgroups?
27 October 1992 Windows for Workgroups 3.1 27 July 1993 Windows NT 3.1I guess this makes you an IDIOT by your own definition. IDIOT.
Windows 3.1 had an upgrade called WFW. It was not a windows release that went by a name.
You do though. The name you go by is total retard.
Indeed. Just ignore AlwaysWrong.
_________________________ /| /| | | ||__|| | Please do not | / O O\__ feed the Trolls. | / \ Thank You. | / \ \ | / _ \ \---------------------´ / |\____\ \ || / | | | |\____/ || / \|_|_|/ | _|| / / \ |____| || / | | | --| | | | |____ --| * _ | |_|_|_| | \-/ *-- _--\ _ \ | || / _ \\ | / `´ * / \_ /- | | | * ___ c_c_c_C/ \C_c_c_c____________
-- Failure does not prove something is impossible, failure simply indicates you are not using the right tools... nico@nctdevpuntnl (punt=.) --------------------------------------------------------------
Says the retarded dork that said it was something else entirely.
Yeah, you've got your finger on the pulse of reality. NOT!
Especially with that immature ASCII stupidity.
Fuck you, 'Nico'.
Why don't you admit you're wrong?
IDIOT.
..like Windows 286??
Bwuahahahahaa! Almost as bad as Windows 95 original release was. It was worse, actually.
There are plenty of timers out there that set-by-radio upon power up/loss/recovery.
Tada! D'oh!
I
memory
not.
and
offer
to
MathCad was a good deal until the vendor took the price way up. Must = have thought that they were suddenly the equivalent of MatrixX or Mathematica.
I think i have a 6.0, and a 2000 version. With Octave and wxMacsyma i don't have much need of it any more.
-
usually
No way. Windows 95 was a real disaster. 98SE was pretty decent though.
Wasn't that Windows NT 1.2?
for=20
The PC=20
Plus you can get Ethernet controlled power switches. They could fit in the mix somewhere.
Feel like selling the 2000 version?
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
-- Dr Philip C D Hobbs Principal ElectroOptical Innovations 55 Orchard Rd Briarcliff Manor NY 10510 845-480-2058 email: hobbs (atsign) electrooptical (period) net http://electrooptical.net
There are power controllers that communicate through the power circuits.
Billiard Halls used them for years (decades). Most only had one PC so never needed Ethernet and there were no Ethernet appliances back then either.
NT 1.2? AFAIK, the first released version was 3.1
ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.