making a mag field

We have a requirement to design a gadget that will work in a 0.06T static magnetic field, and we want to use some miniature telecom type relays. They are not specified for field tolerance. So we need to make such a field and test them.

A simple ring coil of 2 cm radius needs 2000 ampere-turns, kind of messy.

I guess we could buy a big lab-type electromagnet, but that's a hassle.

Maybe something could be done with a couple of these, back-to-back in a steel pipe.

formatting link

If course, we'd have to get some sort of field sensor to calibrate it. With a ring coil, or a solenoid, we could just do the math.

If we had a sensor, maybe we could hack up something with PMs and bits of iron or something. Maybe pave the faces of a machinists's vise with supermagnets?

Any ideas?

Anybody got a big lab magnet?

--

John Larkin                  Highland Technology Inc 
www.highlandtechnology.com   jlarkin at highlandtechnology dot com    

Precision electronic instrumentation 
Picosecond-resolution Digital Delay and Pulse generators 
Custom timing and laser controllers 
Photonics and fiberoptic TTL data links 
VME  analog, thermocouple, LVDT, synchro, tachometer 
Multichannel arbitrary waveform generators
Reply to
John Larkin
Loading thread data ...

0.06T = 600 Gauss. How big a volume (area) do you need. Is field homogeneity important? Maybe a pair of permanent magnets on a steel support with one end threaded to adjust the gap/ field.

Something like this from Pasco?

formatting link

George H.

Reply to
George Herold

The relay is 11 mm along its longest axis, and I guess we should rotate it all sorts of ways to find its most sensitive position in the field.

That's cool. The gap is plenty big, but I can't tell if we could get the field down to 600 gauss. Given that example, the idea of putting magnets on the face of a vise looks practical.

We'd need a gaussmeter, not a bad thing to have anyhow.

(I can't imagine why our customer would expect a VME module to ever see a 600 gauss field.)

Thanks

--

John Larkin         Highland Technology, Inc 

jlarkin at highlandtechnology dot com 
http://www.highlandtechnology.com 

Precision electronic instrumentation 
Picosecond-resolution Digital Delay and Pulse generators 
Custom laser drivers and controllers 
Photonics and fiberoptic TTL data links 
VME thermocouple, LVDT, synchro   acquisition and simulation
Reply to
John Larkin

ACK! All the searches for "gaussmeter" turn up ELF sensors and ghost detectors!

--

John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc

jlarkin at highlandtechnology dot com

formatting link

Precision electronic instrumentation Picosecond-resolution Digital Delay and Pulse generators Custom laser drivers and controllers Photonics and fiberoptic TTL data links VME thermocouple, LVDT, synchro acquisition and simulation

Reply to
John Larkin

Try gaussmeter or gauss meter instead:

--
Jeff Liebermann     jeffl@cruzio.com 
150 Felker St #D    http://www.LearnByDestroying.com 
Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com 
Skype: JeffLiebermann     AE6KS    831-336-2558
Reply to
Jeff Liebermann

To measure the field you could just move the board and measure the generated voltage. ;-)

Reply to
Spehro Pefhany

But then I'd need a board velocity meter!

We'd probably put the relay on a hacked test board so we could get it into the field at various orientations. We'd pulse the coil and look at the contacts and verify that it's still a relay.

Semi-serious DC Hall gaussmeters with probes seem to be around $350 each, except FW Bell, who is 3x that. Ghost detectors start around $50.

--

John Larkin         Highland Technology, Inc 

jlarkin at highlandtechnology dot com 
http://www.highlandtechnology.com 

Precision electronic instrumentation 
Picosecond-resolution Digital Delay and Pulse generators 
Custom laser drivers and controllers 
Photonics and fiberoptic TTL data links 
VME thermocouple, LVDT, synchro   acquisition and simulation
Reply to
John Larkin

Den onsdag den 18. december 2013 22.05.42 UTC+1 skrev John Larkin:

aren't the ghost meters much lower fields? how about?

formatting link

or if you really want cheap:

formatting link

not terribly accurate but I guess you could calibrate at some lower field

-Lasse

Reply to
Lasse Langwadt Christensen

That's cool. I could check its cal with a simple loop coil.

Yeah, but that would be a bunch of work.

--

John Larkin         Highland Technology, Inc 

jlarkin at highlandtechnology dot com 
http://www.highlandtechnology.com 

Precision electronic instrumentation 
Picosecond-resolution Digital Delay and Pulse generators 
Custom laser drivers and controllers 
Photonics and fiberoptic TTL data links 
VME thermocouple, LVDT, synchro   acquisition and simulation
Reply to
John Larkin

Den onsdag den 18. december 2013 22.44.14 UTC+1 skrev John Larkin:

afaict from a quick look it is just the gain that can be from 1mV/G to 1.75mV/G

the same simple loop coil and few currents should do

-Lasse

Reply to
Lasse Langwadt Christensen

How about MuMetal foil? ...Jim Thompson

--
| James E.Thompson                                 |    mens     | 
| Analog Innovations                               |     et      | 
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems  |    manus    | 
| San Tan Valley, AZ 85142   Skype: Contacts Only  |             | 
| Voice:(480)460-2350  Fax: Available upon request |  Brass Rat  | 
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com |    1962     | 
              
I love to cook with wine.     Sometimes I even put it in the food.
Reply to
Jim Thompson

Double-faced tape and an iPhone?

We've got a three-axis one kicking around. I think it's pretty drifty at uT levels.

Reply to
Spehro Pefhany

That last one's not bad. Of course if it's only 600 gauss you can just put a steel can around it.

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

--
Dr Philip C D Hobbs 
Principal Consultant 
ElectroOptical Innovations LLC 
Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics 

160 North State Road #203 
Briarcliff Manor NY 10510 

hobbs at electrooptical dot net 
http://electrooptical.net
Reply to
Phil Hobbs

First option is to wind a Helmholtz coil to get a fairly homogenous volume in space with good access. Lots of info online, my quick calculation says with a diameter of 20 cm, spaced 10 cm apart, you need 6600 ampere-turns to get 60 gauss. Wind 1000 turns on each coil and put 6.6 amps through them in series, and from memory the homogeneity will be in the percent or better range for a sphere about 1 cm dia. I think the book "Building Scientific Instruments" has a good discussion, too - every analytical chemist should have that book on the shelf and regularly reread it :-).

Second option, go to

formatting link
and put N42 material, 1" dia, 0.03125" thick, and 2" spacing into the gap calculation. I get 70 gauss across the midplane with good uniformity out to about 1" dia, by eye. Don't know about in the vertical direction, but it should be ok near the midplane. Their part DX001 is $1.44 each/1, $1.41 each/10, get 10 to play with along with some of their large size magnetic pushpins (great stocking stuffers, yes, I'm a satisfied customer). Use 3/4" PVC pipe, cut a piece 2" long and drill a 3/4" hole perpendicular to the long axis at the middle, stick a disc on each end, and put your solenoid in the cross hole. Play with KJ's calculator to try different diameters and spacing - the problem is you need an appreciable diameter to get the uniformity up, and then the field is already 10x too high until you run the spacing so far apart the uniformity is falling back down (best uniformity is at a spacing equal to the radius of the disc, measured from the center of each disc).

Get one of those 3-1/2 digit 3 tesla max meters off ebay to measure and map and you are in business. Adjust the tube length as needed to change the field. Go wild and thread two pieces together so you can just unscrew them a little to drop the field :-). If you really want a better estimate of the uniformity over some volume download the free program femm and model it, or send me an email and I'll run it for you.

We have a requirement to design a gadget that will work in a 0.06T static magnetic field, and we want to use some miniature telecom type relays. They are not specified for field tolerance. So we need to make such a field and test them.

A simple ring coil of 2 cm radius needs 2000 ampere-turns, kind of messy.

I guess we could buy a big lab-type electromagnet, but that's a hassle.

Maybe something could be done with a couple of these, back-to-back in a steel pipe.

formatting link

If course, we'd have to get some sort of field sensor to calibrate it. With a ring coil, or a solenoid, we could just do the math.

If we had a sensor, maybe we could hack up something with PMs and bits of iron or something. Maybe pave the faces of a machinists's vise with supermagnets?

Any ideas?

Anybody got a big lab magnet?

--

John Larkin                  Highland Technology Inc 
www.highlandtechnology.com   jlarkin at highlandtechnology dot com 

Precision electronic instrumentation 
Picosecond-resolution Digital Delay and Pulse generators 
Custom timing and laser controllers 
Photonics and fiberoptic TTL data links 
VME  analog, thermocouple, LVDT, synchro, tachometer 
Multichannel arbitrary waveform generators
Reply to
Carl Ijames

6000 a-t sounds like a lot of work.

I ordered the $180 ebay field meter that Lasse suggested. I think I'll try putting lots of little round supermagnets on the faces of a machinist's vise, which should have a pretty good magnetic circuit. George's Pasco link suggests that that might work.

I'll post pics.

--

John Larkin         Highland Technology, Inc 

jlarkin at highlandtechnology dot com 
http://www.highlandtechnology.com 

Precision electronic instrumentation 
Picosecond-resolution Digital Delay and Pulse generators 
Custom laser drivers and controllers 
Photonics and fiberoptic TTL data links 
VME thermocouple, LVDT, synchro   acquisition and simulation
Reply to
John Larkin

Yes, option 2 sounds better to me, too, but I wanted to point out that the coils aren't that bad to make and since you sell magnet drivers I kind of figured that part would be trivial for you :-). I think lots of little magnets are going to have terrible uniformity, which is why I suggested the two larger discs. When you order the little ones, get a pair of big ones, too, just to try them. It's only $3, after all.

6000 a-t sounds like a lot of work.

I ordered the $180 ebay field meter that Lasse suggested. I think I'll try putting lots of little round supermagnets on the faces of a machinist's vise, which should have a pretty good magnetic circuit. George's Pasco link suggests that that might work.

I'll post pics.

--

John Larkin         Highland Technology, Inc 

jlarkin at highlandtechnology dot com 
http://www.highlandtechnology.com 

Precision electronic instrumentation 
Picosecond-resolution Digital Delay and Pulse generators 
Custom laser drivers and controllers 
Photonics and fiberoptic TTL data links 
VME thermocouple, LVDT, synchro   acquisition and simulation
Reply to
Carl Ijames

Mumetal will effectively disappear at field strengths like that.

Best regards, Spehro Pefhany

--
"it's the network..."                          "The Journey is the reward" 
speff@interlog.com             Info for manufacturers: http://www.trexon.com 
Embedded software/hardware/analog  Info for designers:  http://www.speff.com
Reply to
Spehro Pefhany

Getting haunted in your search?

Reply to
Robert Baer

Hall effect based industrial strength Gauss meters are routinely available. Years ago at LBNL, I remember using one to measure the magnetic field along the axis of cylindrical mu-metal magnetic shields. These mu-metal shields were used to protect photomultiplier tubes used in nuclear physics experiments.

Reply to
dakupoto

We had a permanent magnet and an electromagnetic that produed about 0.5T hrough a gap of 1 inch with a face about 4 by 4 inches at least.

The thing weighed 1800 pounds and the electromagnetic had water cooled wiring taking something like 3 kW

Do you have access to any friends working in ion implantation? Somewhere in Silicon Valley should be a source. The magnetic fields those thing generate with a control of better than 0.1% would do your task easily.

Reply to
RobertMacy

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.