LeCroy scopes vs. Tek and Agilent for a specific measurement

Hi:

I am trying to measure the shot-to-shot energy stability of a pulsed optical parametric oscillator. It produces 8ns, 125mJ pulses of 460nm light, which I measure with either a 1ns photodiode, or a pyroelectric "joulemeter" sensor which produces a several microsecond pulse whose peak amplitude is proportional to the laser energy.

In the PD case, I integrate the instantaneous power vs. time on a scope, then measure the peak-peak amplitude of the integral with statistics to get energy. In the pyro sensor case, I simply measure the amplitude with statistics.

My Agilent MSO7054 scope can do this, but has some deficiencies:

  1. It doesn't automatically compute relative standard deviation which is the important thing, so I have to type in the std.dev. / mean every time with my calculator to see the effect. Since the OPO average energy might change along with the std. deviation when a change is made, I can't just look at the absolute std. dev.. I need relative std. deviation.

  1. It does accumulating rather than moving average stats., so I have to press "reset statistics" to start a new accumulation every time I make a change to the optics to see what the effect was.

  2. Ideally I'd like a trend plot of the relative standard deviation as well.

I've been considering three other scope models, the Agilent 9000 series, Tek DPO7000, and Tek MSO4000.

Today I evaluated the Tek MSO4054 and Agilent 9000. The Tek can do a moving average statistic which is an improvement. But still no relative standard deviation. It doesn't allow one to write arbitrary expressions using the statistical measurements, only the built-in waveform measures, so there is no way to compute rel. std. dev. with its math expression feature.

The Agilent 9000 (I forget precisely which model) also had no way to compute rel. std. dev., and I couldn't figure out whether it was doing moving ave. or accumulating stats. I didn't spend a whole lot of time with it after being sure it wasn't an improvement over the MSO4054.

Tomorrow I will see a Tek DPO7000, but after studying the manual tonight, I'm convinced that it will also not be able to write math expressions using the stats. So I expect I will discover that it too can't do what I want.

A pal at work recently bought a LeCroy 104MXi-A which costs less, has more BW, more memory, and faster sampling than the 500MHz Tek and Agilent scopes that are about the $ limit my boss can handle.

He told me it can basically do everything I want! I will call LeCroy tomorrow and request a demo. They lent him one for 5 days to eval.

But many people swear "LeCroy sucks." Actually, I used one in college. It had statistical calculations at a time when this was unheard of. It made easy work of some physics research that we were doing on organic photo-refractive polymers.

So while the LeCroy's might not be the best electronic debugging tools (slower waveform update rate under some circumstances) for finding glitches, etc., they do seem to be superior laboratory data acquisition and analysis platforms, for a similar price class to Tek and Agilent.

I will hopefully discover the real truth in a few days.

Any comments will be appreciated!

Good day!

--
_____________________
Mr.CRC
 Click to see the full signature
Reply to
Mr.CRC
Loading thread data ...

We recently went through a similar exercise with Lecroy, Tek, and Agilent, except our concern was high speed data (>10Gbps) and low jitter measurements.

Lecroy has come a long way and is certainly the best bang for the buck if you don't need super high sampling rate, very low jitter, and very low noise floor.

The Agilent is the best for sampling rate, jitter, and noise floor, but you pay for it. I was not too impressed with their user interface on their DSA91304A.

The Tek is a happy midpoint for performance and price.

With either of these scopes, you can certainly write your own processing app or purchase it if it's available.

Sorry that I can't help you with your specific needs, but you should look for 3rd party apps.

Bob

--
== All google group posts are automatically deleted due to spam ==
Reply to
BobW

I have a Lecroy 44Mxi which offers the facility of linking measured data very directly to your own processing in MATLAB (or some other things) running on the scope itself. I think the model you mention has the same feature. I have had no problems with mine.

Michael Kellett

Reply to
Michael Kellett

You could look at the higher end Rhode & Shwartz and Yokogawa offerings too.

--

John Devereux
Reply to
John Devereux

Bob, I have a similar project on the horizon. Which scope did you get?

--
Joe Chisolm
Marble Falls, Tx.
Reply to
Joe Chisolm

Why not use the scope as an acquisition front-end and export waveforms into a PC? That gives you a lot of cheap options for doing analysis.

John

Reply to
John Larkin

Tek DSA71604B Bob

--
== All google group posts are automatically deleted due to spam ==
Reply to
BobW

With photodiodes, you can back-bias them, then feed the output into a capacitor to ground, paralleled with a suitably high valued resistor, and digitize the output with a high-impedance instrument. You no longer need a fast instrument since the capacitor does the integrating. Size the resistor so that the charge decays back to zero between pulses.

Paul Probert

Reply to
Paul Probert

Thanks for the reply.

Certainly the Windows based scopes can run auxiliary apps. The Agilent

90000 and Tek 70000 class scopes are about 5x my budget range. I could just convince by boxx to let me buy a Tek DPO7000, if it were perfect.

But today revealed that it can't do this rel. std. dev. measurement out of the box either. Tek support indicated that it could be done via an application written to use its programming interface.

Good day!

--
_____________________
Mr.CRC
 Click to see the full signature
Reply to
Mr.CRC

Thanks for the input.

MATLAB integration is interesting, and is also offered on Agilent 9000 series and probably higher models. LeCroy also seems to integrate MathCAD. Too bad it's not Mathematica, which I know. I have MATLAB, but haven't had time to work with it much. My company would be happy to send me to a quick course on it if I wanted.

My co-worker get part way through a demo of the 104Mxi-A today, but I had to run to a seminar with an interviewee.

I think it may be possible to do what I want with the LeCroy out of the box, and even in more ways than one.

I have a borrowed Tek MSO4000 now, to evaluate whether to keep the one in the unopened box.

My boss has the attitude that if the one we just received is generally useful in our laboratories, then it might be easiest to just keep it, and get something else later it necessary.

If I'm lucky I'll wind up with one of each of Agilent 7000B, Tek MSO4000, and a LeCroy 104Mxi-A!

Good day!

--
_____________________
Mr.CRC
 Click to see the full signature
Reply to
Mr.CRC

John, this is certainly a workable approach. It would be preferable to do it out of the box though. Also, if I can see a numeric value, as well as a trend line, it would be peachy.

PC apps aren't my specialty, though I could figure it out given some time. I prefer to program bare silicon. In that regard it might be more fun and expedient for me to hack a gadget that combines a peak detector with a micro to compute relative std. deviation, and spit it out as an analog value to plot on a scope in strip chart mode, as well as show on a meter.

This would be relatively easy to do with the rather slow pyroelectric sensor signal.

We have a contractor programmer who does most of our data acquisition software. He could possibly do it, but he's a bit overloaded these days. As it seems are most of us who are still employed.

Perhaps I should also be looking into whether or not the laser power meter readouts can produce this statistic (when in energy meter mode). And if not, why not?

Good day!

--
_____________________
Mr.CRC
 Click to see the full signature
Reply to
Mr.CRC

Thanks for the reply.

Yes, that will give me a signal similar to what is produced by the pyroelectric sensor.

Speed isn't the problem, lack of sophisticated built-in statistics is.

Good day!

--
_____________________
Mr.CRC
 Click to see the full signature
Reply to
Mr.CRC

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.