Is there a 555 timer with a high Z Control Voltage pin

The normal 555 timer has Control Voltage pin that is intended to be decoupled to ground. For voltage controlled PWM circuits this pin is driven but must obviously be from a low impedance source.

Most datasheets don't even qualify this input resistance and was wondering if anyone knew of an IC with the same features as a 555 but where the Control Voltage input pin is high impedance?

--
Mike Perkins 
Eclectric Ltd 
www.eclectric.co.uk
Reply to
Mike Perkins
Loading thread data ...

Ya mean like a CMOS 555? How about a CMOS 555.

NT

Reply to
tabbypurr

The CMOS CV input impedance is around 100k, higher than a bipolar 555 but not as high as CMOS logic. The output impedance of whatever driving it will probably have to be significantly less than that as the CMOS input still feeds the midpoint of a voltage divider across the rails

Reply to
bitrex

It's easy to see what the input impedance of the control voltage input is from the equivalent schematic:

The CV input feeds some high-impedance comparator inputs and the upper voltage-divider point of a string of resistors, in the BJT version they're about 5k and in the CMOS version they're about 200k.

The comparator inputs draws negligible current by comparison when operating normally so the resistor string will dominate, so the small signal AC input impedance will be around 5k || 10k in the BJT version and 200k || 400k in the CMOS

Reply to
bitrex

Plus some capacitance maybe 20-50 pf?

Reply to
bitrex

I thought the purpose of the CV input was to provide a point to add a capacitor to remove sensitivity to power supply noise. I suppose if you are driving the pin with a signal this doesn't matter.

Rick C.

- Get 6 months of free supercharging - Tesla referral code -

formatting link

Reply to
gnuarm.deletethisbit

The purpose of the Control Voltage pin is probably to add a "control voltage" dat's why they call it "Control Voltage"! Heh! IC designers are funny guys

Reply to
bitrex

By definition no, because the control pin is a resistor divider, period.

The highest I know of is this at ~6M (total),

formatting link

Tim

-- Seven Transistor Labs, LLC Electrical Engineering Consultation and Design Website:

formatting link

Reply to
Tim Williams

That would be a rather disingenious* use of the pin, but yes, there's definitely reason for its being there!

*Meaning the opposite of "ingenious", not "disingenuous". It feels kind of unfortunate that this isn't actually a word, or the application of it at least.

Example:

formatting link
Yes, I actually once took the time to create an actually-good 555 SMPS circuit. Both to show off to the haters, and to show newbies how it can be done. And to both: now let's use UC3843 and never mention the 555 again.

Tim

--
Seven Transistor Labs, LLC 
Electrical Engineering Consultation and Design 
Website: https://www.seventransistorlabs.com/
Reply to
Tim Williams

Vectrex power supply board:

a 555 ran the CRT voltages, it looks like line regulation was accomplished via running the 555 off an unregulated input rail and connecting the CV pin to regulated 5 volts, and load regulation indirectly via the -30/-9 rail

Reply to
bitrex

Tim Williams wrote

Oh well, I had [1] a HeNe laser supply

formatting link
the 555 circuit (copied from the PCB) looks something like this:
formatting link
the HV cascade on the right has its ground connected in reality to -EHT and forms a current limiting feedback.

[1] Worked OK though, replaced it with a PIC and real PWM and voltage stabilization using its transformer, HV cascade and TIP140:
formatting link

No longer have a HeNe laser..... :-)

Reply to
<698839253X6D445TD

The old school 555 has 3 5K resistors in series** so the impedance is 3.3K +/- a lot.

The LMC555 has 3 100K resistors so 66.7K nominal impedance.

If you want higher, just add a unity gain buffer op-amp, like MCP6001 for

5V operation. 10^13 ohms typical input resistance, which should be adequate.

--Spehro Pefhany

** apparently not the origin of the part number
Reply to
speff

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.