hendershot generator

HAS Anybody out there built and used the Hendershot generator to power up a home? And if so how well dose it work?

Reply to
Brianss
Loading thread data ...

You need to build one for each room, one isn't enough for your whole house.

And, since all your house wiring is interconnected, it is recommended that you build all of the needed units first, then fire them all up together. ...Jim Thompson

--
| James E.Thompson                                 |    mens     | 
| Analog Innovations                               |     et      | 
 Click to see the full signature
Reply to
Jim Thompson

It doesn't matter how it works, it's free energy. :-(

Reply to
amdx

up a

and if you are lucky you get what you pay for ...

-Lasse

Reply to
Lasse Langwadt Christensen

What the hell is it, BrainAss?

Reply to
John S

Perpetual motion machines work by the following mechanism:

  • "Inventors" come up with some razz-matazz to convince fools that they have a perpetual motion machine that actually works.
  • Fools give the "inventors" money.

Since the function of the invention is to separate fools from their money, they only need to generate the illusion of energy.

--
Tim Wescott 
Wescott Design Services 
 Click to see the full signature
Reply to
Tim Wescott

It's okay but be sure to install a transfer switch to get back on the grid from time to time, like anytime you want power.

Reply to
bloggs.fredbloggs.fred

No-one ever has. It doesn't work.

--
John Larkin                  Highland Technology Inc 
www.highlandtechnology.com   jlarkin at highlandtechnology dot com    
 Click to see the full signature
Reply to
John Larkin

The real secret is to plow a small part of the money into the next scam, hopefully with a fresh face for a partner. If you can find someone with a PhD who will lie, like Slowman, all the better. Only then does it become "perpetual".

Reply to
krw

I don't know. Maybe if you got him one of those "matchbook" nobel prizes? You know, like oboma has.

Reply to
tm

If the Ph.D.s aren't any more enthusiastic about lying than I am, this is v ery bad advice, but since krw regards anybody who doesn't share his asinine delusions as a liar, he probably isn't being intentionally misleading.

There are people around who've got Ph.D.s on the basis of faked results, an d if your entrepreneur could find one of them before they get caught they m ight do better.

The most convincing "free energy" story in recent years would be Pons and F leischmann's "cold fusion"

formatting link

and that seems to have been more of an unfortuate over-reaction to some ver y odd experimental results than any kind of deliberate fraud - Fleischmann at least had a very good reputation when I was working in the same departme nt at Southhampton back in 1972.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
Reply to
Bill Sloman

"Fire" is the operative term. Un-synched generators tied together tend to create a HOT argument between each other.

Reply to
Robert Baer

TINSTAAFL. Remember the 3 laws of conservation of energy: (1) you cannot win, (2) you cannot break even, (3) you lose.

Reply to
Robert Baer

At least USPTO have *finally* stopped accepting patents for perpetual motion machines. The purpose of these scams is to separate the credulous fools from as much of their money as possible. It works only too well as the latest incarnation called eCat demonstrates so well.

Not even that. People will believe what they want to believe irrespective of powerful scientific evidence to the contrary.

The closest I have seen to a perpetual motion machine is an electrostatic Zamboni pile and an small piece of aluminium foil. They were used to power first generation night vision equipment. The foil jumps to and fro until metal fatigue gets the better of it. Total output power is in the low 100s of nW.

The Oxford electric bell has been powered by one since 1840.

formatting link

I think there is another somewhere using a sulphur ball and friction also in hard vacuum not been running quite as long. It made the news a decade or so back when an industrial dispute threatened to deprive it of the LN2 needed for the hard vacuum cold trap.

--
Regards, 
Martin Brown
Reply to
Martin Brown

You missed the intended joke entirely :-( ...Jim Thompson

--
| James E.Thompson                                 |    mens     | 
| Analog Innovations                               |     et      | 
 Click to see the full signature
Reply to
Jim Thompson

(3) You cannot get out of the game.

Reply to
krw

The PTO has required a working model to accompany all perpetual motion machine patents for many years. What do you mean, "finally"?

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

--
Dr Philip C D Hobbs 
Principal Consultant 
 Click to see the full signature
Reply to
Phil Hobbs

No, it is #3. Yours is a direct consequence of #1 & #2. If you cannot win or draw, you must lose. That's the universe of possible outcomes of game play.

It *is* #3.

Reply to
krw

It falls back to the examiner. If he believes that it relies on perpetual motion, it's automatically denied until a working model can be examined. If the energy is coming from somewhere, it still need not be proven to patent. The rules haven't changed for some time but the examiners are being trained to see the difference a bit better these days.

Reply to
krw

Normally #3 is quoted as "you cannot get out of the game"

kevin

Reply to
kevin93

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.