HAS Anybody out there built and used the Hendershot generator to power up a home? And if so how well dose it work?
- posted
10 years ago
HAS Anybody out there built and used the Hendershot generator to power up a home? And if so how well dose it work?
You need to build one for each room, one isn't enough for your whole house.
And, since all your house wiring is interconnected, it is recommended that you build all of the needed units first, then fire them all up together. ...Jim Thompson
-- | James E.Thompson | mens | | Analog Innovations | et |
It doesn't matter how it works, it's free energy. :-(
up a
and if you are lucky you get what you pay for ...
-Lasse
What the hell is it, BrainAss?
Perpetual motion machines work by the following mechanism:
Since the function of the invention is to separate fools from their money, they only need to generate the illusion of energy.
-- Tim Wescott Wescott Design Services
It's okay but be sure to install a transfer switch to get back on the grid from time to time, like anytime you want power.
No-one ever has. It doesn't work.
-- John Larkin Highland Technology Inc www.highlandtechnology.com jlarkin at highlandtechnology dot com
The real secret is to plow a small part of the money into the next scam, hopefully with a fresh face for a partner. If you can find someone with a PhD who will lie, like Slowman, all the better. Only then does it become "perpetual".
I don't know. Maybe if you got him one of those "matchbook" nobel prizes? You know, like oboma has.
If the Ph.D.s aren't any more enthusiastic about lying than I am, this is v ery bad advice, but since krw regards anybody who doesn't share his asinine delusions as a liar, he probably isn't being intentionally misleading.
There are people around who've got Ph.D.s on the basis of faked results, an d if your entrepreneur could find one of them before they get caught they m ight do better.
The most convincing "free energy" story in recent years would be Pons and F leischmann's "cold fusion"
and that seems to have been more of an unfortuate over-reaction to some ver y odd experimental results than any kind of deliberate fraud - Fleischmann at least had a very good reputation when I was working in the same departme nt at Southhampton back in 1972.
-- Bill Sloman, Sydney
"Fire" is the operative term. Un-synched generators tied together tend to create a HOT argument between each other.
TINSTAAFL. Remember the 3 laws of conservation of energy: (1) you cannot win, (2) you cannot break even, (3) you lose.
At least USPTO have *finally* stopped accepting patents for perpetual motion machines. The purpose of these scams is to separate the credulous fools from as much of their money as possible. It works only too well as the latest incarnation called eCat demonstrates so well.
Not even that. People will believe what they want to believe irrespective of powerful scientific evidence to the contrary.
The closest I have seen to a perpetual motion machine is an electrostatic Zamboni pile and an small piece of aluminium foil. They were used to power first generation night vision equipment. The foil jumps to and fro until metal fatigue gets the better of it. Total output power is in the low 100s of nW.
The Oxford electric bell has been powered by one since 1840.
I think there is another somewhere using a sulphur ball and friction also in hard vacuum not been running quite as long. It made the news a decade or so back when an industrial dispute threatened to deprive it of the LN2 needed for the hard vacuum cold trap.
-- Regards, Martin Brown
You missed the intended joke entirely :-( ...Jim Thompson
-- | James E.Thompson | mens | | Analog Innovations | et |
(3) You cannot get out of the game.
The PTO has required a working model to accompany all perpetual motion machine patents for many years. What do you mean, "finally"?
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
-- Dr Philip C D Hobbs Principal Consultant
No, it is #3. Yours is a direct consequence of #1 & #2. If you cannot win or draw, you must lose. That's the universe of possible outcomes of game play.
It *is* #3.
It falls back to the examiner. If he believes that it relies on perpetual motion, it's automatically denied until a working model can be examined. If the energy is coming from somewhere, it still need not be proven to patent. The rules haven't changed for some time but the examiners are being trained to see the difference a bit better these days.
Normally #3 is quoted as "you cannot get out of the game"
kevin
ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.