Hall sensors are integrated with analog circuitry intended for sensitivity; could you use the old, crude bismuth resistor instead? It doesn't give sign of the field, isn't directional, but it doesn't saturate either.
Maybe you could reduce increase the range by putting a piece of iron near the sensor to steal some of the field. You'd need to calibrate it with an unmodified sensor.
--
Best Regards,
ChesterW
+++
Dr Chester Wildey
Founder MRRA Inc.
Electronic and Optoelectronic Instruments
MRI Motion, fNIRS Brain Scanners, Counterfeit and Covert Marker Detection
Fort Worth, Texas, USA
www.mrrainc.com
wildey at mrrainc7 dot com delete_the_seven
Can you tell us more about the magnetic circuit in which you want to measure this induction? I'm asking this because I'm thinking of some kind of inverse flux concentration. That would require the possibility to locally increase the area through which the flux passes. 25% increase then gives you a reading of 800 mT when the field in the rest of the circuit would be 1T. But I have absolutely no idea whether or not you are constrained in your design, or whether you have to do a measurement in an existing magnetic configuration.
Also, beware hysteresis, and saturation (any permeability nonlinearity, really).
Does it help to simply use a regular sensor at an angle? Output goes as the cosine against field lines. Can't guarantee the Hall effect won't screw up more things inside the chip, though.
Have you tried the ones from floppy drive brushless motors? I have seen boards with three of them having their excitation pins connected in series, (with a current-limiting resistor), between the 5V and 0V power rails. Each sensor had its two output wires going to the input pins of a comparator in the motor driver chip. Bearing in mind the voltages applied, I doubt they have any amplifiers built in, so I expect they would have no problem with measuring fairly high fields. I built one into a probe for comparing magnets, but I don't have any calibrated fields (and I don't feel like winding Helmholz coils right now) so I can't test it for you at 1T.
For really extreme high fields, you could use a piece of PCB foil. For hobby use, maybe a large thin-film SMT resistor could be used too, if you scratch off the insulation and add silver paint in the right places.
I would discharge a capacitor into it. Yes, it would need to be mechanically sturdy! The only other way I can think of to calibrate a 1T hall effect device is with a more conventional approximately 1T magnet that can be measured accurately by spinning a small coil of known area and measuring the induced voltage to measure the field. All of these methods sound like a lot of work so someone else can do it!
Well, you don't write anything about your budget, but in my experience, the only useful Hall probes in the 1 T range are those from FW Bell and Projekt Elektronik
It's for measuring the Flux inside a slot of a permanent magnet synchronous motor to evaluate the BEMF waveform during operation. We have added a coil on top of the standard coil, but the coupling between the standard coil is high so instead of monitoring the BEMF, we instead just measure more or le ss the applied voltage from the inverter drive
That's the reason for using a Hall sensor, that will measure only the magne tic field and won't care much about common mode noise either
ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.