Great test equipment designs

Given the choice only one meter to take with me in the field, it would be my Simpson 260. It has been in wheat fields all over the Northwest and Canada when working on irrigation machines. It has pulled my butt out of the fire many times.

Reply to
John S
Loading thread data ...

General Radio 1531A StroboTac?

I have one at home and one at work. Vacuum tube based, if cared for properl y they simply will not die!

Steve

Reply to
sroberts6328

rly they simply will not die!

Holy Cow, Still in production:

formatting link

Steve

Reply to
sroberts6328

Am 01.08.2018 um 00:34 schrieb Phil Hobbs:

I had and still have one of the first HP-35, it could do sines and other miracles. The father of a class mate ordered them for us, he worked for Brown, Boverie & Cie. They were not yet available on the open market. I also still have an HP-41.

But what I really use daily is Go41C on my Android cell phone.

cheers, Gerhard

Reply to
Gerhard Hoffmann

I have a 92A, but it reads about 3 dB low. I rely on HP 3400Aa and 3403As.

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

Reply to
pcdhobbs

All I could afford was a Sinclair Scientific :(

I've just bought an HP35 as a reminder of the only HP35 I was able to use: it was bolted to a desk in the university library.

It was clearly the first owner's pride and joy, since it is in a custom-made hardwood box. Apparently he worked at Rolls Royce and had it for 30 years, since new.

I cleaned the switch contacts, replaced the plastic film stopping dust getting into the keys, and it still works.

Reply to
Tom Gardner

Does it have the "exp bug"? 2.02 ln e^x gives 2, not 2.02

I use an HP15 emulator in linux, or an HP32

Reply to
Tom Gardner

I use wcalc in a terminal in Linux, or wcalc -EE

Or if it really gets complictiatiated (almost never) octave

Mathlab was free for raspberri pi, have that too somewhere.

units is also a handy command line program in Linux. ~# units

1948 units, 71 prefixes, 28 functions You have: apples Unknown unit 'apples' You have: 10 miles You want: km * 16.09344 / 0.062137119

And gnuplot to display data, all together now: http://217.120.43.67/nuclear/a_run_50_outside_2728000.gif :-)

Reply to
<698839253X6D445TD

The 35 was my favorite calculator. Not programmable, thank goodness.

The keys were wonderful, and pi is in plain sight. No shifting/dual-use of keys, no goofy internal states. The display scaling seems to always be right.

The power switches were flakey.

Somebody should make a modern clone.

--

John Larkin         Highland Technology, Inc 

lunatic fringe electronics
Reply to
John Larkin

At Tulane, we weren't allowed to use electronic calculators in tests, because that gave an unfair advantage to rich kids.

--

John Larkin         Highland Technology, Inc 

lunatic fringe electronics
Reply to
John Larkin

Was that the six-digit one?

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

--
Dr Philip C D Hobbs 
Principal Consultant 
ElectroOptical Innovations LLC 
Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics 

160 North State Road #203 
Briarcliff Manor NY 10510 

hobbs at electrooptical dot net 
http://electrooptical.net
Reply to
Phil Hobbs

This one:

formatting link

Quirky? Sure!

Note that the ROM held 320 instructions, and Nigel Searle managed to keyboard, display, arithmetic and transcendental functions into those 320 instructions. Not much accuracy, but hey, it only cost 10% of the HP35's price!

Reply to
Tom Gardner

Just so. I've tried using programmable calculators, and always gone back to using some form of computer program.

The on/off switch isn't protected by the plastic film that protects the keys.

My on/off switch definitely needed cleaning with IPA, and I've added a smear of silicone grease.

They've done that with some of the other calculators; they seem to have an "S" suffix.

Reply to
Tom Gardner

The first time I was allowed to use a calculator was in the first year university exams. For most questions a calculator wasn't needed, but for one it was. A significant number of students didn't recognise that and so got wrong answers. Tee hee.

The question was something simple related to the voltages at the nodes of an inverting opamp circuit.

Reply to
Tom Gardner

In that vein, Prof Eric Laithwaite at Imperial College always set final exams with - one easy question that could be answered by anyone that had turned up to the lectures. That was sufficient for a pass mark - several questions where average students would get partial answers and get mediocre degrees, and good students could demonstrate their competence, and gain first class honours - one question that couldn't be adequately answered in the available time, and should be avoided

He expected his students to be able to distinguish which topics to avoid.

I wonder if that is even conceivable nowadays.

Reply to
Tom Gardner

Fast oscilloscopes have made a lot of old RF instruments obsolete.

The Boonton 72x capacitance meters are wonderful. My 72B has a 1 pF full-scale range.

--

John Larkin         Highland Technology, Inc 
picosecond timing   precision measurement  

jlarkin att highlandtechnology dott com 
http://www.highlandtechnology.com
Reply to
John Larkin

There was a "modern" version of the HP35, but it was junk.

I have a bunch of 32SII's which are too complex but OK.

--

John Larkin         Highland Technology, Inc 
picosecond timing   precision measurement  

jlarkin att highlandtechnology dott com 
http://www.highlandtechnology.com
Reply to
John Larkin

Forcing them to think? Probably not.

--

John Larkin         Highland Technology, Inc 
picosecond timing   precision measurement  

jlarkin att highlandtechnology dott com 
http://www.highlandtechnology.com
Reply to
John Larkin

Up to a point. Scopes typically have ENOBs between 6 and 8, so if you use a scale that gets you a decent crest factor like 10, there aren't a lot of bits left for the actual measurement. My HP 89441A is 14-bits iirc, which is a lot better.

Mine are the 3-1/2 digit ones, 2-2000 pF FS.

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

--
Dr Philip C D Hobbs 
Principal Consultant 
ElectroOptical Innovations LLC 
Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics 

160 North State Road #203 
Briarcliff Manor NY 10510 

hobbs at electrooptical dot net 
http://electrooptical.net
Reply to
Phil Hobbs

Me too, at least once I had a computer. Between 1975 and 1984, I did a lot of calculator programming.

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

--
Dr Philip C D Hobbs 
Principal Consultant 
ElectroOptical Innovations LLC 
Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics 

160 North State Road #203 
Briarcliff Manor NY 10510 

hobbs at electrooptical dot net 
http://electrooptical.net
Reply to
Phil Hobbs

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.