don't understand finance

formatting link

How can they have earnings of 16 cents per share, but a loss of $144 million in the same quarter?

I wonder what Twitter does to have expenses around a few billion a year. The free food and bean-bag chairs can't cost that much.

--
John Larkin         Highland Technology, Inc 
picosecond timing   precision measurement  
 Click to see the full signature
Reply to
John Larkin
Loading thread data ...

What's two plus two? Bad accountant: 3. Normal accountant: 4. Good accountant: "what do you want it to be?"

Reply to
Tom Gardner

Very easy. (I am not an accountant and don't play oen on TV, but I do my own business taxes.) The earnings are from their real sales of whatever it is Twitter sells, I guess advertising. The loss is something that they are claiming to the IRS so they don't have to pay taxes on ther net. And, you can deduct a whole RANGE of crazy stuff like depreciation of the value of your "goodwill". Or, at least, if you have an inventive accountant, you can try to deduct that stuff.

Jon

Reply to
Jon Elson

Really bright accountant: "-18527, and I can get you a nice loss carry-forward for the next, oh, 10 years or so"

:-)

--
Regards, Joerg 

http://www.analogconsultants.com/
Reply to
Joerg

Bookmarked :)

Reply to
Tom Gardner

Movie stars will accept payment in terms of a share of the movie's gross receipts, but not its profit.

Why? Because Hollywood accountants are adept at ensuring no movie ever make a profit - because that could be taxed.

The only definition of money that I've ever been able to understand is that, as it says on my banknotes, a "promise". Believe the promise, and all is well. Don't believe it and the edifice resembles Zimbabwe. Money is a useful fiction.

Reply to
Tom Gardner

That's not exactly right. If the movie owes payments on profits then they will make the profit in any of the many service companies that the studio owns rather than the movie itself making the money. Taxes have to be paid by someone if there is profit. If there is no profit, there's not much reason to be in business. The only question is who makes the profit and who pays the taxes.

--

Rick C
Reply to
rickman

unless one of those service companies happen to be located in a place where there are no taxes

Reply to
Lasse Langwadt Christensen

No time to read your link, John, but maybe they're deferring the loss til the next tax year for tax planning purposes?

Reply to
Cursitor Doom

Accounting tricks. They are using non-gaap for the +.16 per share. From the share holder letter:

GAAP net loss in the quarter was $167 million, resulting in GAAP diluted EPS of ($0.23). Non-GAAP net income was $119 million and non-GAAP diluted EPS was $0.16.

--
Chisolm 
Republic of Texas
Reply to
Joe Chisolm

Oh, OK, they are cheating.

Long term, you can't hide running out of money.

--
John Larkin         Highland Technology, Inc 
picosecond timing   precision measurement  
 Click to see the full signature
Reply to
John Larkin

They are doing non-GAAP to take away stock based compensation and such. +0.16 is for the investors, -0.23 is for the IRS. If you are so inclined they have a section in the stockhoder news letter explaining their non-gaap methods.

--
Chisolm 
Republic of Texas
Reply to
Joe Chisolm

Internet infrastructure for a billion bust users? Phone-system access fees? International ditto?

--
 Thanks, 
    - Win
Reply to
Winfield Hill

Ahh, but profit comes AFTER salaries are paid. Looks like you're going to make a big profit on something? Quick, raise your salary! Voila, no more "profit".

Jon

Reply to
Jon Elson

No, then it's *income* which not only requires taxes, but FICA!

--

Rick C
Reply to
rickman

But salary is only taxed once. That's why tax lawyers make the big bux. The tax law is so convoluted that it takes a lawyer to even try to sort it all out.

Reply to
krw

That's what LLCs and S-Corps are for. It's just C-Corps that have the double-taxation problem.

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

Reply to
pcdhobbs

Sure but the point of them is that the corporation and the individual are the same. They're quite limited and I doubt many movie companies are S-Corps.

Reply to
krw

Just federal income tax, state income tax, FICA, workman's comp, and a few other things heaped on that salary.

A big company 401K contribution, or a giant pizza order, is a better way to dump profits. Deductable to the company, no increase in employees taxes.

--
John Larkin         Highland Technology, Inc 

lunatic fringe electronics
 Click to see the full signature
Reply to
John Larkin

Only on dividends. Salaries, bonuses, health care, 401K, educational stipends are all expenses.

--
John Larkin         Highland Technology, Inc 

lunatic fringe electronics
 Click to see the full signature
Reply to
John Larkin

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.