Chile shake up.

Isn't 8.8 Richter Aa world's record in recorded history?

Reply to
Lil Red Riding In The Hood
Loading thread data ...

"Lil Red Riding In The Hood"

** Nope.

Chile had a much worse quake in May of 1960 - measured 9.5 on the modified Richter scale.

3 others are known to have been larger than 8.8 going back to 1755.

formatting link

Probably a great many larger earth quakes have occurred, but no seismographs were available to measure them.

.... Phil

Reply to
Phil Allison

"Lil Red Riding In The Hood" wrote in message news: snipped-for-privacy@4ax.com...

No,

Here's a list of earthquakes (that have been recorded)...

1960 Chile Mag 9.5

1964 Prince Willaim sound , Alaska, Mag 9.2

2004 Sumatra Indian Ocean Mag 9.1

You can sort thu the list here...

formatting link

Cheers

Reply to
Martin Riddle

That one, I would trust the declaration of, but it is difficult, as that is one hell of a number on a log scale.

A reference that old, I would question the accuracy of the measurement devices in use at the time, much less, their calibration.

What part of "recorded history" are you having problems with the meaning of?

Reply to
Lil Red Riding In The Hood

Not for earthquakes, you retarded, senseless f*ck.

Reply to
Bart!

"Bart the Fuckwit Fart "

** Wot INSANE CRAPOLOGY

ROTFL !!!!!

.... Phil

Reply to
Phil Allison

This quake is not a magnitude 8.8 on the Richter scale. It is an 8.8 on the Moment Magnitude scale. The two scales are similar but the MM scale has bigger numbers at the high end.

The Richter scale is based on the magnitude of the displacement or the amplitude of the movement. Each whole number on the scale is 10 times the amplitude of the previous number so the scale is based on the log base 10 of the amplitude.

The Moment Magnitude scale is based on the energy released and each whole number is equal to 10^3/2 power greater energy than the previous number. Ten^3/2 = 31.6 so the energy released is 31.6 times larger for each whole number increase in magnitude.

It turns out that the Chile quake was 501 times stronger in energy than the Haiti 7.0 quake.

Increase in energy = 10^ (3/2 * (8.8 -7.0)) = 501 times

Reply to
Bob Eld

The Richter scale was developed in 1935.

So yes, your entire case is insane, and your entire skull cavity is filled with nothing but CRAPOLOGY, boy.

So, yeah, I laugh heartily at your utter stupidity.

Reply to
TheJoker

"TheJoker"

** Recorded history goes back 6,000 years -

you completely asinine, FUCKHEAD TROLL !!

.... Phil

Reply to
Phil Allison

That's OK. We'll all be hit by a 200 Teraton displacement effect rock named Jesus soon enough. Maybe then everyone will wake up.

Reply to
life imitates life

NOT for earthquakes, you retarded, brain bent, pussified, sub-human piece of shit!

God damn, boy! Get your doctor to put you back on the Thorazine.

Maybe then you'll stay the f*ck out of these groups, which you NEVER have anything to say that ANYONE wants to read.

Your stupidity is beyond pathetic.

Reply to
TheJoker

Sheesh, what's with the fractional exponent? Apparently they decided to use a new measure but fudged it so it scaled sort of like the Richter. It would have been better just to go with a new scale, would have been less misleading -- escpecially for non-engineering types. If the MM scale relates to energy and Richter relates to movement amplitude, maybe they have the same distinction between them as between power and voltage (or current) gain: a factor of two in the dB number. I addition to the other stuff you wrote. Confusing.

Reply to
Michael Robinson

Except that Richter also describes the volume mass displacement, in Mega or Giga tonnage. Even Teratons.

The wiki even extrapolates what they think the KT meteorite displaced.

Reply to
Archimedes' Lever

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.