This looks like a much better way to have web-based access to usenet than Google Groups.
This does have a limit of 5 postings per day, so they will not contribute to spamming. I would gladly contribute to the efforts of this service.
I was unable to post, however. I even tried a little-used NG sci.engr.electrical.sys-protection. But I'll contact them to see why posting does not work.
Usually I only need to read, and not post, newsgroups when I am at work or elsewhere without access to a news server, so I will use this rather than Google. It's actually much better!
I AdBlocked the stupid background image immediately. The format of the entry page after that is OK--if that's what you like. The times stated as GMT {plus/minus} drives me batty. Web links aren't clickable there--cut & paste only.
Kinda stupid that the opening page uses a monospaced font and the *message* pages AREN'T. Whitespace in HTML pages gets collapsed and isn't recoverable.
Google's ability to show monospaced pages is absolutely necessary to read ASCII prints; nobody else offers this.
That sucks. I searched Google's Usenet archive and noticed that InterBulletin also adds a 1-line footer ad; Google scores again.
Hmmm. Earlier today, went there and pulled up a Posting page but I didn't actually attempt to post. I *was* mildly impressed; now--not so much.
Not a glowing recomendation so far.
...until somebody posts a schematic. . . These guys (Poland) have a fair archive for *reading*:
formatting link
Latency is low.
Web links are clickable; Usenet Message IDs AREN'T (another thing Google gets right). No ability to post from there. There is no indication of threading. . . Next to Google, THESE folks have the best Web interface I've found:
formatting link
The latency is very low. The threading is indicated. (I'm not crazy about the way it's done--but it's there.)
No clickable links of any type--in fact, long links get mangled, so cut & paste is a chore. They also add a 1-line footer ad to posts made from there.
Here is another Web-based site for reading the group. It allows posting--but adds a 3-LINE FOOTER AD to posts. They update in bursts, so latency for reading can be 2 hours. I can't say what posting latency is like--but I wouldn't hold my breath.
The page design has one really stupid premise: On my Gecko browser, the leftmost 35% of the screen is essentially blank space. After applying NukeAnything (or Platypus), it's much better.
On the main page, posts are arranged by posting time so there are multiple instances of the same thread (like interbulletin.com--which I don't like).
Long Subject lines are truncated. Subject lines with non-7-bit characters look like crap (mostly spam anyway). ...and they delete topics marked as OT
--but *keep* REAL spam (Morons) ...or maybe they just don't properly index a lot of posts (see "timestamps", below).
On pages for reading posts, the threading is nicely indicated
--but timestamps are a mish-mash. Web links are clickable; Usenet Message IDs AREN'T.
While they make an effort to retain spacing, it's a proportional font
--so unless you reconfigure your browser, ASCII prints will be junk.
Absolutely, an appropriate amount of "goofing off" being necessary to overall productivity and mental health. Some folks take smoke breaks, some wander over to the coffee mess, some take a gander at usenet, some do other things (darts, anyone?).
Where I work as a consultant, they do not have usenet access, or at least they have ignored my requests to set it up. So I need a web-based method to at least read posts, which are often related to the work I am doing there. I can wait until I get home to post replies, but it's helpful to be able to read some of the posts there.
My email to InterBulletin bounced, and I never was able to post. And it seems they have even longer latency than the one suggested:
ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.