Patience. It should eventually short: "Polymer electrolytic capacitors, tantalum as well as aluminum polymer capacitors are polarized capacitors and generally requires the anode electrode voltage to be positive relative to the cathode voltage. Nevertheless, they can withstand for short instants a type dependent reverse voltage for a limited number of cycles.[54][55] A reverse voltage higher than the type-dependent threshold level applied for a long time to the polymer electrolyte capacitor leads to short-circuit and to destruction of the capacitor."
Now all one needs to do is decode what the "type dependent threshold level" means for polymer caps. Sigh.
--
Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com
150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558
The [54] and [55] refererences are both to tantalum caps. They are known to fail at reverse voltage, and sometimes at rated positive voltage.
I'll just let my test keep going. I only need to run them at -5 in real life.
This is interesting:
formatting link
Both anode and cathode seem to have Al2O3 coatings.
My 56u 25V Panasonic cap stands over 110 volts in the positive direction. Maybe I'll crank one up to some outrageous reverse voltage and see what happens.
--
John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc
lunatic fringe electronics
Please note the differences in coating thickness. Reverse leakage does not 'form' this layer, as the chemistry just isn't there as it is in Al electrolytics.
The original Oscon product from Sanyo indicated a 20% temporary or 10% continuous reverse voltage rating. I'm not sure what subsequent vendors claim.
Normal leakage currents have a two orders of magnitude response time, over hundred hour periods, for a stepped voltage (though this is speeded up at elevated temperatures). Rated leakage on first use is only specified after one hour at the application voltage.
While the normal failure mode in these parts is age/stress related to produce reduced C and higher ESR, a short circuit failure mode is predicted for forward or reverse overstress, surge charge or discharge current, or simple mechanical abuse.
Parts with 35 or 50 volts rating approach your requirement, without abuse. I'm not sure what your exercise is intended to prove, as qualification of even small numbers of parts outside of their specified limits is likely to be impractical.
If there is no active chemistry, sustained reverse voltage will not degrade the main dielectric layer either. The only long-term trend in leakage current that I'm seeing is decline, so maybe nothing is being eaten away. There is a jump in leakage current when polarity is reversed, but that drops back down with a time constant of hours. I *said* it was boring.
I tested some other polymer part a while back (180u 6.3V UnitedChemCon) and it failed hard at around 11 volts. Apparently different structure from the 56u Panasonic.
Why do you suggest that?
I'm designing basically a many-channel bipolar power supply that has to run from +15 to -5 out, and a big cap across each output would be handy.
We use lots of parts outside of specs, or make up our own specs when the manufacturer doesn't provide them. Testing, maybe to destruction, is one tool.
--
John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc
lunatic fringe electronics
35V 10 uF at -5V. started out at ~10 uA but dropped quickly to about
2 uA. I hit it with some heat. (solder iron on a lead) and it went up to
7 uA but is now coming down again.
I flipped it over, at +5V the leakage is ~100 times smaller.
Sure warms up the lab, in cooperation with the HP 8566 and 35665A. When more than a few are running, I have to open the windows even in the winter.
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
--
Dr Philip C D Hobbs
Principal Consultant
ElectroOptical Innovations LLC
Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics
160 North State Road #203
Briarcliff Manor NY 10510
hobbs at electrooptical dot net
http://electrooptical.net
At one trade show, Tek had a small box that accepted the SD-series sampling heads and interfaced to a PC, making a screen-less sampling scope. They never marketed it. That would be a cool project, a box that used the cheap old SD heads to make a USB oscilloscope. The hardest part would be to find the connector.
--
John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc
lunatic fringe electronics
--
Dr Philip C D Hobbs
Principal Consultant
ElectroOptical Innovations LLC
Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics
160 North State Road #203
Briarcliff Manor NY 10510
hobbs at electrooptical dot net
http://electrooptical.net
Looks like a 36W4 connector. ITT/Cannon catalog: There's a photo of the connector on the cover, Pg 1. See Pg 46 and 47 for 75 ohm version and Pg 225 for the 50 ohm variant. Search the catalog for "36W4" as there are other connectors with the same pin arrangement, but with different mounting hardware. I can help assemble the full part number later. You won't like the price.
--
Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com
150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558
Pg 55 has the non-right-angle version. Looks like the connector number is: DDMV36X4SNA197 (50 ohm) DDMV36C4SNA197 (75 ohm) both without screw locks or board locks. My guess(tm) is that it's probably 50 ohms but this needs to be checked.
Only $40 to $65/ea (ouch):
Asking price for sampling heads on eBay vary from $150 to $400: but are selling for much less:
Drivel: Beware of seriously overpriced extension cables:
--
Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com
150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558
ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.