Bill Sloman's Socialist Utopia comes to the USA

Let's see grade 'A' asshole Sloman defend this type of behaviour:

formatting link

Reply to
Julian Barnes
Loading thread data ...

Fortunately we don't have wacko's like that here !!

Reply to
Rheilly Phoull

Why would anybody go to the trouble of watching a You Tube sequences posted by Julian Barnes?

The typical YouTube sequence is a tedious waste of time, and Julian Barnes isn't known for his critical insight.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
Reply to
bill.sloman

A deadly cocktail of high hormones and low IQ...

Reply to
bloggs.fredbloggs.fred

I have to agree Bill

Reply to
Rheilly Phoull

I wonder what she was on ??

Reply to
Rheilly Phoull

Hehe! I saw what you did there. :-) As you've already alluded, Bill Sloman trying to put people off watching a clip is guaranteed to have the opposite outcome. :->

Reply to
Cursitor Doom

Holy Crap! This is an incredibly bizarre video. What's more bizarre is that anyone in their right mind would think this has anything to do with politics, much less any particular political philosophy.

Why the hell would anyone who didn't make that video feel the need to justify it?

But it does make me want to change my name to Hugh Mungus.

--

Rick C
Reply to
rickman

Just another Hilliary brain washed follower..

That must be a good drug plan you're on!

Jamie

Reply to
M Philbrook

If you've got a brain to wash, you'll probably like Hillary Clinton.

If you are as dim as Jamie you will be blind to Donald Trump's obvious defects. Jamie is another posturing buffoon and can't see the problem.

Rickman doesn't need to take anything to see the world more or less the way it is. No amount of pharmaceutical help could get Jamie up to that level.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
Reply to
bill.sloman

Cursitor Doom may be silly enough to think that. I know how little influence I have. The main point of the comment was to get up Julian Barnes' nose.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
Reply to
bill.sloman

Actually, the Express is one of the few decent newspapers in the UK prepared to fearlessly report the kind of 'sensitive' stories the others shrink to touch. Stories that highlight the terrible damage uncontrolled immigration is bringing in its wake.

Stories like this one which is typical of what we're facing today:

formatting link
twice-Britain

This kind of outrage is just one reason we voted to abandon the EU cesspit to its fate.

Reply to
Cursitor Doom

I've no idea what the hell that's got to do with anything. The fact is this feral thug was able to travel from Romania to the UK due to our membership of the EU. We were unable to deny him and his disgusting layabout/parasite family entry. Fortunately, however, this Globalist nonsense is on the cusp of a severe reversal as more and more Europeans are flocking to the prudent and pragmatic doctrines of Nationalism for their salvation and turning their backs on open borders. Better late than never I guess!

Reply to
Cursitor Doom

That's a typically disingenuous statement on your part. The EU's earlier incarnation was as a "Common Market" which most certainly *was* sold as a free trade area. Only after it reached a certain critical mass of slave vassal state members did it feel confident enough to morph into a nascent political union (which *was* the plan from the start).

Reply to
Cursitor Doom

Correct. We have enough of our own already without importing even more riff-raff from eastern europe.

Reply to
Cursitor Doom

??????

It has always been a political project from the start.

The goal of the "European coal and steel community" (as it was called in the beginning) was to create a structure "bound" some of the countries that where involved in WW-II together; especially France and Germany, two arch-enemies who fought out three wars in 75 years (1870 to 1945).

"The ECSC was first proposed by French foreign minister Robert Schuman on 9 May 1950 as a way to prevent further war between France and Germany. He declared his aim was to "make war not only unthinkable but materially impossible"[3] which was to be achieved by regional integration, of which the ECSC was the first step."

source:

formatting link

formatting link

I don't know where you went to high-school. This is basic historical knowledge that everybody in Europe should know.

Kr.

Reply to
kristoff

I know. I said that! Do try to pay attention FFS. It was sold in the *UK* as a Common Market free trade area. We (in the UK) were never informed of its deeper, insidious purpose at the time of the 1975 referendum on membership of this criminal cabal.

Reply to
Cursitor Doom

Hi,

First of all, if you form your opinion only based on the information provided to you by politicians, I think you've only got yourself to blame.

But, considering 1975, I do think you have to be honest.

1975, that where still the times where 99.999% of the population did not look then their own nose and had very limited -if any- contact with anything outside their own country. (perhaps except as a soldier).

Also, -as this was 30 years after the end of WW-II- the majority of the voters had had no direct experience war -at least a war at the scale of WW-II- let alone experienced the fact that democracy can destroy itself by themselves.

As a result, an argument like "you know, this 30 years of peace in Europe we have had now -something that has never happened before in European history- is largely due to the process of European, which we now want to join" was a argument that would not give much of an emotional response.

People had already already got used to peace in Europe and taken it for granted.

In 1975, trade and jobs "sold" much better. (probably both for the population and the politicians).

However, let's be fair. This is 2016. We now live in times of information. Considering the amount of news, information, analysis and knowledge that is available now, if you still do fail to learn the basic facts of the history of the last 100 years in your own little corner of the world, ... you really do not have an excuse.

Kr.

Reply to
kristoff

formatting link

Jean Monnet never made any secret of where he thought that it was going.

You may not have been paying attention at the time, but people who read mor e up-market newspapers than the Daily Express were better informed. I was r eading the Observer in Australia in the 1960' and was a subscriber to the G uardian and the Observer from the time I started living in the UK in 1971.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
Reply to
bill.sloman

Cursitor Doom has never been "informed" about anything. You can exposed a right-wing nitwit to information, but you can't make him think.

What Edward Heath said to sell the Common Market to the UK electorate wasn't the only information available, and the kinds of quality newspapers that Cursitor Doom clearly doesn't read did provide a lot more information.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
Reply to
bill.sloman

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.