Posted by John Larkin on June 8, 2009, 11:39 pm
On Tue, 09 Jun 2009 03:09:57 GMT, dufus@bunghole.com (Richard Cranium)
wrote:
>>Will you try a very simple electrical puzzle?
>>
>>John
>>
>You're making an On-Topic reply to a purposely Off-Topic post. That
>just seems very, very wrong.
I'll take that for a "no".
What *are* you good at?
John
Posted by Corbomite Carrie on June 8, 2009, 11:50 pm
On Mon, 08 Jun 2009 20:39:10 -0700, John Larkin
>On Tue, 09 Jun 2009 03:09:57 GMT, dufus@bunghole.com (RichTard The Bottom of
the barrell Retard Cranium)
>wrote:
>>>Will you try a very simple electrical puzzle?
>>>
>>>John
>>>
>>You're making an On-Topic reply to a purposely Off-Topic post. That
>>just seems very, very wrong.
>I'll take that for a "no".
>What *are* you good at?
>John
You're looking at it in the post you responded to. Retarded trolling by
a trolling retard that wants to be called Richard Cranium for some
retarded reason..
That's what his first post was about, and that's what all his current
posts are about. He is a total kook. A first class Usenet loon.
He dug the hole, jumped in, and now he is standing at the bottom of the
pit, trying to play you or anyone else that bites for a fool.
Posted by Richard Cranium on June 9, 2009, 12:30 am
On Mon, 08 Jun 2009 20:50:34 -0700, Corbomite Carrie
<<<<<Snip>>>>>
Hello Archie. Do you think you found a willing partner in John
Larkin? Do you think you found someone who may validate your attempts
to shift the focus started in alt.video.dvd? I don't think so. John
appears to be a serious participant here with a narrow focus that is
consistent with the group title. He's tried more than once to change
my subject matter to electronics; but I attribute that to his sincere
desire to maintain that focus - he does not understand what you are,
what you have said and how others are reacting He has also been on
the receiving end of some of your silly garbage served up via more
than one nym. I may be wrong, but I do not see John wishing to stray
too far off topic. Hence, you still have to defend your claim of
celibacy and take the puzzle challenge.
Posted by MooseFET on June 9, 2009, 5:19 am
On Jun 8, 9:30 pm, du...@bunghole.com (Richard Cranium) wrote:
> On Mon, 08 Jun 2009 20:50:34 -0700, Corbomite Carrie
> <<<<<Snip>>>>>
> Hello Archie. Do you think you found a willing partner in John
> Larkin? Do you think you found someone who may validate your attempts
> to shift the focus started in alt.video.dvd? I don't think so. John
> appears to be a serious participant here with a narrow focus that is
> consistent with the group title. He's tried more than once to change
> my subject matter to electronics; but I attribute that to his sincere
> desire to maintain that focus - he does not understand what you are,
No, it is more like John Larkin doesn't care what he is. He wants to
talk about electronics in an electronics news group. This shouldn't
come as much of a shock. If we were posting in alt.lemurs.cooked, the
discussion would constantly get dragged over towards what sort of
sauce is best. If this was alt.barney.diediedie the topic would be
the effects of gamma rays on purple foam.
> what you have said and how others are reacting He has also been on
> the receiving end of some of your silly garbage served up via more
> than one nym. I may be wrong, but I do not see John wishing to stray
> too far off topic. Hence, you still have to defend your claim of
> celibacy and take the puzzle challenge.
Posted by John Larkin on June 9, 2009, 9:30 am
On Tue, 09 Jun 2009 04:30:41 GMT, dufus@bunghole.com (Richard Cranium)
wrote:
>On Mon, 08 Jun 2009 20:50:34 -0700, Corbomite Carrie
><<<<<Snip>>>>>
>Hello Archie. Do you think you found a willing partner in John
>Larkin? Do you think you found someone who may validate your attempts
>to shift the focus started in alt.video.dvd? I don't think so. John
>appears to be a serious participant here with a narrow focus that is
>consistent with the group title. He's tried more than once to change
>my subject matter to electronics; but I attribute that to his sincere
>desire to maintain that focus -
No, it's more like my sincere desire to not be bored by your juvenile
prattle. Amateurs should post somewhere else.
>he does not understand what you are,
Of course I do. He's a foul, bad-tempered tech who resents engineers
who can actually design stuff.
What do you do? Is it useful?
>what you have said and how others are reacting He has also been on
>the receiving end of some of your silly garbage served up via more
>than one nym. I may be wrong, but I do not see John wishing to stray
>too far off topic. Hence, you still have to defend your claim of
>celibacy and take the puzzle challenge.
I'm happy to stray off topic, if there's any intelligent content.
Neither you nor MiniProng contribute any. Both of you are cowards for
hiding behind nyms.
John
>>
>>John
>>
>You're making an On-Topic reply to a purposely Off-Topic post. That
>just seems very, very wrong.